Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Moore Vilifies American Soldiers
NewsMax.com ^ | 6/28/04 | Mike Gallagher

Posted on 06/28/2004 6:29:48 AM PDT by kattracks

You won't believe what Michael Moore does to the American soldier in his propaganda-filled "Fahrenheit 9/11."

I was ready for ugliness. I prepared myself for mean-spirited attacks. I guess I was just totally unprepared for what he does to our troops.

It's grotesque.

He basically takes a handful of soldiers who said and did some bad things and tries to portray them as what the American soldiers are all about in the war on terror.

And then, at the end of the film, after he rapes our soldiers' honor, integrity, and courage, he slaps up a written message on the screen that lasts for a few seconds and claims that he dedicates this vicious movie to those who died on 9/11 and the soldiers who have lost their lives in the war. As if that would nullify what he and his movie had just done to them.

Like many Americans, I had mixed emotions about seeing it. The idea of putting ten dollars into this deception master's pocket repulsed me. But after I was given an opportunity to see the movie for free, I decided that in this case, it was better to keep one's enemy closer than one's friend.

And make no mistake about it, Michael Moore is our enemy. If you need proof, go see the film.

The distortions are downright silly, almost juvenile. Let me poke at one that hasn't yet been written about very extensively. Moore portrays President Bush's 2000 inauguration as one that featured angry Americans lining the streets of Washington and pelting his motorcade with foreign objects, forcing the President to forego the customary walk down Pennsylvania Avenue.

I was at Bush's Inauguration in 2000. The President was in the car because it was raining. The streets were lined with cheering, happy Americans who were delighted that Al Gore and the Democrats didn't manage to steal the election.

But Moore shows footage of a handful of protesters and skillfully edits that shot into images of the motorcade driving down the street.

And wait until you see how he portrays Iraq prior to the invasion. Does he show any of Iraq's torture chambers? Any of the devastation and destruction that Saddam and his regime continually heaped upon his people? No, Michael Moore shows Iraqi children blissfully flying kites in the park. Heck, he even repeats the same footage of Saddam over and over again: chomping on a cigar, he's shown dancing with some clerics and Muslims. Sort of like Santa Claus with a beret, right, Michael?

This is a movie you should go see for yourself. Trying to wish it away won't make it so. The mainstream press is salivating over it ("Two thumbs up!" scream Ebert and what's-his-name). It's setting movie-attendance records, evidently. So you might as well suck it up and see firsthand how an America-hating, money-grubbing, real-life propagandist can influence the unknowing and unwitting masses.

Just like "Bowling for Columbine", Michael Moore exploits tragedy and heartache for his own profit in "Fahrenheit 9/11." Last time, he manipulated a Columbine victim for his anti-gun message (wheeling a shooting victim into a store that sold bullets to see if the store would refund the victim the cost of the bullets still lodged in the victim's body).

This time, it's an angry, grieving mother of a soldier who was killed in the war that Moore shamelessly exploits. Wiring her up with a microphone, his cameras capture her every sob and moan as she stands outside the White House railing against George W. Bush and the world for her loss.

Michael Moore is a terrorist's best friend. They don't need Al Jazeera to broadcast anti-American hatred. They've got the man who's winning awards and accolades for this movie. "Fahrenheit 9/11" can be shown at every terrorist training camp in the world. They can point to a Hollywood blockbuster as proof that our President is a buffoon and American soldiers are just a bunch of ignorant, vicious killers who love playing rock music as they mow down the poor kite-flying Iraqi children.

Go see the movie. Keep it in your heart and mind as you consider who to vote for in November.

And just wait until you see what he does to the American soldier.

Mike Gallagher's talk radio show has just recently been picked up in Houston and San Francisco. Besides his radio show and appearances on Fox News Channel, Gallagher is working on his first book, "Surrounded by Idiots: Fighting Liberal Lunacy in America", to be released in early 2005 by William Morrow, a Harper Collins imprint.



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: fahrenheit911
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: kattracks

This article seems to have a sinister plea for people to go see the movie...makes me skeptical.


21 posted on 06/28/2004 7:00:14 AM PDT by grumple (I'm too old to worry about whether or not I'm a pain in your ass...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson
Read down a little further...he states:

"But after I was given an opportunity to see the movie for free, I decided that in this case, it was better to keep one's enemy closer than one's friend.

One has to see the movie to be able to point out Moore's inaccuracies and downright lies such as this author did.

22 posted on 06/28/2004 7:07:25 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

"Is that too tough?"

nothing less than he deserves.


23 posted on 06/28/2004 7:17:17 AM PDT by CzarNicky (The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Piquaboy

Reference your post # 3.

Me too.


24 posted on 06/28/2004 7:24:15 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

according to box office mojo the film grossed 21 mill this weekend at 800+ theatres. I keep hearing about 82 mill gross. What planet did that figure originate from??


25 posted on 06/28/2004 7:26:10 AM PDT by mlmr (Tag-less - Tag-free, anti-tag, in-tag-able, without tag, under-tagged, tag-deprived...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

according to box office mojo the film grossed 21 mill this weekend at 800+ theatres. I keep hearing about 82 mill gross. What planet did that figure originate from??


26 posted on 06/28/2004 7:26:10 AM PDT by mlmr (Tag-less - Tag-free, anti-tag, in-tag-able, without tag, under-tagged, tag-deprived...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

He wants us all to go see it? In a pigseye!! I don't need to stick my fingers in the fire to know it burns; I don't need to shoot my foot to know misusing guns can result in injury; I sure don't need to go to this stinkin' movie to know it's vile enough to make me nauseous. I refuse to give one cent of my money to this fat, traitorous jerk.


27 posted on 06/28/2004 7:27:34 AM PDT by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CzarNicky

Who said that, a spokesman for the Academy? Who?


28 posted on 06/28/2004 7:31:11 AM PDT by Hildy ( If you don't stand up for what's RIGHT, you'll settle for what's LEFT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious

Ditto.


29 posted on 06/28/2004 7:31:58 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"He basically takes a handful of soldiers who said and did some bad things and tries to portray them as what the American soldiers are all about in the war on terror."

WHO??????........JOHN KERRY??????????......OHHHH, sorry, it's MICHAEL MOORE....coulda fooled me, for a minute there I thought it was 1970!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

30 posted on 06/28/2004 7:37:52 AM PDT by soozla ("F.U. - LONG OVERDUE!!" - BUSH/CHENEY '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Really, it's the Hollywoodian "PG" version of Babes of Bagdad. It's pornography portrayed as "art". Geez, and Maplethorpe got about as much kudos from the left as Moore is for this film. Moore says Americans are dumb. He may not be too far off. He does an "Emperor's Clothing" flick and rakes in the dough from mostly, his political followers. Whoa.


31 posted on 06/28/2004 7:47:39 AM PDT by Alia (California -- It's Groovy! Baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

I don't know for certain. It was a radio news blurb. I haven't seen anything else about it.


32 posted on 06/28/2004 7:51:06 AM PDT by CzarNicky (The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: macrahanish #1
The fifth columnist movie reviewer

Didn't Drudge a story "9 of 10 ["professional"] reviewers...both thumbs up.

33 posted on 06/28/2004 8:00:45 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: grumple

"This article seems to have a sinister plea for people to go see the movie...makes me skeptical."

Heck no! This article is from Michael Gallagher, the totally conservative,love America, pro-
military/police, Christian talk show host!. He's absolutely amazing - he's absolutely, totally against the left/liberals. He's on Fox News a lot. No, he's shooting straight from the hip - he's for real. Nothing sinister from him, no way, no how! He's definitely on OUR side.


34 posted on 06/28/2004 8:44:12 AM PDT by jackibutterfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Gefreiter

That was Hezzbollah, and they will distribute it.


35 posted on 06/28/2004 9:13:38 AM PDT by Chieftain (To all who serve and support those who serve - thank you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
This is a movie you should go see for yourself. Trying to wish it away won't make it so. The mainstream press is salivating over it ("Two thumbs up!" scream Ebert and what's-his-name). It's setting movie-attendance records, evidently. So you might as well suck it up and see firsthand how an America-hating, money-grubbing, real-life propagandist can influence the unknowing and unwitting masses.

But then he says the above. I have no intention of seeing this movie. A few may see it to review it, but I won't give him my money: I already know how he operates.

36 posted on 06/28/2004 9:23:04 AM PDT by briant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

I wouldn't give Moore the sweat off my back let alone $10.00 for a ticket. Moore is human trash with a lost soul.


37 posted on 06/28/2004 9:32:13 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: briant
Some seem to advocate seeing it, if only to booo the screen and it's author.

I plan no such viewing, however. I do not even watch CNN.

38 posted on 06/28/2004 9:39:11 AM PDT by Cold Heat ("Politics is not a bad profession. If you disgrace yourself, you can always write a book."(Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

This is going to work against the LLL. It is based mostly on Moore's well-known contempt for the American people. Lumpy Riefenstahl's arrogance is breathtaking. He and his media followers have pulled out all the stops to make this film the anthem and symbol of LLL activism in the 21st Century, and it will backfire disastrously. He and the media are guilty of monumental hubris in believing that this crude work of propaganda will enhance their cause. It will destroy them.


39 posted on 06/28/2004 9:46:07 AM PDT by atomic conspiracy (A few words for the media: Julius Streicher, follow his path, share his fate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This is a movie you should go see for yourself. Trying to wish it away won't make it so. The mainstream press is salivating over it ("Two thumbs up!" scream Ebert and what's-his-name). It's setting movie-attendance records, evidently. So you might as well suck it up and see firsthand how an America-hating, money-grubbing, real-life propagandist can influence the unknowing and unwitting masses.

I have not seen Triumph of the Will or The Eternal Jew. I would have to watch both of those films on video before I approach propaganda of this sort. Make no bones about it, this is propaganda. I just want to draw allusions to 2 notorious examples from another war.

Michael Moore has made his film a comparable work by ignoring the evil in Saddam's Iraq and in demonizing the Bush family.

P.S., I will not be paying to watch Mr. Moore's film ever. If a situation presents itself, then I may view it, but my general take is "why bother"?

It sounds as if his conspiracy theories are conflicting. Does this turkey have more plot holes than a Hollywood summer action film?

40 posted on 06/28/2004 10:37:12 AM PDT by weegee (Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. ~~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson