Posted on 06/28/2004 5:39:59 AM PDT by runningbear
bookmark for later
I'm sure that Distaso will be able to FOCUS on this point of attempted trickery by Geragos. If he's smart he will hammer the deceitfulness of Geragos's behaviour until it is drilled into the Jurors heads. Geragos HAD this discovery (interview with the said witness) for at least a year!! I read that the witness thought it might have been Dec. 20th or Dec. 23rd. I'm led to believe that LACI did NOT go into Scott's warehouse because of the chemicals.
I've emailed them all and accused them of attempting to set another wife and baby killer free just to get a headline. The truth just won't suffice for these bottomfeeders.
We've NEVER seen or heard where she is RG. I wondered the same thing myself. I don't even know if she is alive still.
Your NOT dreaming. That is exactly what he said.
Hear any updates on today's proceedings???
(06-28) 10:12 PDT REDWOOD CITY, Calif. (AP) --
The judge in the Laci Peterson case admonished the Modesto Police Department on Monday for violating a gag order by publicly criticizing the defense.
Under cross-examination Thursday, defense attorney Mark Geragos got Detective Allen Brocchini to admit he deliberately deleted from his report a witness account that could be favorable to Scott Peterson, on trial in the death of his pregnant wife, Laci.
On Friday, Modesto police Sgt. Ed Steele told The Associated Press that Brocchini omitted the material because it is in other police reports provided to the defense.
"It's Geragos' spin," Steel told the AP.
All parties in the case are bound by the order that prevents them from talking.
Judge Alfred A. Delucchi called a Modesto police captain from the gallery Monday to stand before him.
"This has to stop," Delucchi said. "Go tell the chief that he's going to have to sit on his folks ... or there's going to be trouble."
After the admonishment, Geragos resumed his cross-examination of
Not yet Jackie. I am home today so I will keep checking. They mentioned one little blurb when I turned CTV on but it was just that Beth Karas would be giving a report at 12:30 I think. I'm hoping that Distaso is snorting mad today. I would like to see him exert some aggressiveness like he did that one time in the Prelim!! He CAN do it. Let's hope that Geragos pushed his buttons on Friday.
Doesn't that just piss you right off??? I haven't heard the Judge say ONE word to the flapping, yapping, Peterson's!!
I know... time is precious.... ;o)
Amber may have taped Peterson before she went to the Police. She became aware of Peterson's marriage on Dec. 9th. On December 10th he goes and buys a boat. On December 14th, Peterson takes Amber to her Christmas party while leaving Laci alone at a couples baby shower. It was during Peterson's little explation to Amber about being married that he said he had "lost" his wife a year ago and that this would be his FIRST Christmas without her.
I'm not sure if Amber's friend told her about Laci "missing". I do know that SP begged Amber's friend to let him tell Amber himself about being married. That way he could lie and say that he WAS married but had lost his wife. Plus shed a few crocodile tears. HOW Amber found out about Laci JUST going missing I don't know but it was less than week before she went to Police herself.
I just listened to Beth Karas and she says there is "friendly cross-examination" of Brocchini going on still. They are dwelling right now on Kim McGregor. It appears to me that Geragos is just throwing anything and everything out there. Obviously Distaso has NOT be able to do his re-direct yet. According to Kimberly G-Newsome there is just a bunch of what if's coming out attempting to establish reasonable doubt.
I read that Article bear. I do agree that Amber probably didn't want to believe that Scott was responsible. But her attorney says, it will be Scott's OWN words that harm him a lot more than Amber's.
It's true! The guy has another woman expecting his child and he already has one with that same woman.
Such class, eh? She really can pick 'em.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.