Posted on 06/28/2004 5:39:59 AM PDT by runningbear
Who knows, maybe the same careless clerk advised SP on which enhancement stamps to buy. That would explain that part of the equation, hope they call the clerk to testify. If the clerk testifies that SP wanted the license and enhancement stamps to fish in SF Bay on Dec.23 and 24th, premeditation would be easier to prove.
Were these calls taped by Amber??The police weren't taping yet.
---
Don't know what kind of record Amber was keeping. She might have been keeping a log. She didn't contact the Modesto Police until Dec. 30th.. Don't know yet when she started working with them, I'm trying to read the time line it's difficult cuz it's so long. The amount of calls on that one day --JUMPS OUT AT ME....
>>The amount of calls on that one day --JUMPS OUT AT ME....<<
If you figure it out, would you please ping me??
No, I have not heard a news reader come right out and say “He is guilty”, but the tone of the coverage does say it. Leaked evidence against him is highlighted, evidence in his defense is treated as less than meaningful. They are careful to use the term “alleged”.
This is one explanation...IMHO..it might indicate that Amber was accustomed to talking to Scott daily...she got upset on no calls on the 24th, had already started thinking he was married and not being truthful...?
Lots of splainin' going on and his hiding from the camera, no pictures of him with Laci order, no TV interviews might indicate this.
Oh, you mean when the defense is doing a good job, and maybe blow a few holes in an investigation. I always thought that was what trials were all about. Stupid me.
I believe she has that wrong....He may have called her the early morning hours the 25th from his shower , with the Sharon in the next room but I do not believe he had time to go the his MIL's home to shower on the 24th..
Ron Granski:" When you can't dazzle them with brilliance, dazzle them with bull"
I AGREE!!! Can you believe that A&E is running the ORIGINAL "Who killed Laci Peterson" show right NOW???? I mean that is so out of date. It just seems like the ENTIRE media want to see this KILLER walk!! They need to be hit in the pocket book that's the only thing they listen to.
but I do not believe he had time to go the his MIL's home to shower on the 24th.. Why would he need another shower having taken one around 5:00ish after he returned from fishing, or am I wrong in believing he took one?
I think I take everything that has not been verified with a block of salt..I don't think he had time to go to Sharon's on the 24th and have never before heard it said that he did...The water running/shower running part doesn't concern me..the timing of his visit to Sharon's does.
Please. You have already decided the guy is guilty, and nothing short of forensic proof is going to change your mind. Unfortunately for you, forensic proof is not the standard. Reasonable doubt is.
I have posted to very few of these threads, and then only recently. And every time I have said that I think the guy is guilty. I haven't seen proof of this though.
My personal feelings aren't important, but I think under such circumstances, a jury should be able to find an individual guilty. All this does is shift the burden of proof to the defendent.(Except when the prosecution is seeking the death penalty.)
If he is found Not Guilty....it is over....and no amount of proof can convict him.
I think Amber was probably pumping for information. Remember the Prosescution have heard all these tapes. He was STILL lying to Amber the FIRST night Laci was being searched for. He called her from the Search center. I think anything about Amber will be cleared up. She did pass a polygraph test. He WOULDN'T take one.
>>Westerfield's came out only because his lawyer's goofed<<
Westerfield was also charged with having the child porn. Peterson does not have any such charges. If I were betting, I'd say it doesn't come in. Hope I'm wrong, but I doubt it.
Nope, I meant what I said. You haven't heard the Prosecution case. An outline only.!! Clearly you and I view the Law differently PLUS there is just good old plain COMMON SENSE. This guys actions don't even come within the boundaries of ABNORMAL. They are WAAAAAAAAAAY out of whack. It was clearly obvious within the first hours he was RELIEVED TO BE RID OF HIS WIFE AND CHILD!!
If your interested there is a scottisinnocent site!! I SEE NOTHING, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, pointing to his Innocence.!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.