Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Devil_Anse
Upon further inspection, it appears that SP was issued a 2003 Two-Day Sport Fishing License to cover two days, Dec.23 & Dec.24, in 2002. Same thing with the Ocean Enhancement Stamp. Both of the serial numbers match those recorded on the cash register receipt dated 12/20/02 at approximately 3:49 PM. Since these items were retrieved by MPD on 12/27/02 I guess it would be safe to say the clerk at Big 5 goofed up.

Who knows, maybe the same careless clerk advised SP on which enhancement stamps to buy. That would explain that part of the equation, hope they call the clerk to testify. If the clerk testifies that SP wanted the license and enhancement stamps to fish in SF Bay on Dec.23 and 24th, premeditation would be easier to prove.

141 posted on 06/28/2004 4:56:32 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: RGSpincich
maybe the same careless clerk advised SP on which enhancement stamps to buy

That's what I think happened.

235 posted on 06/28/2004 9:51:19 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

To: RGSpincich

Wait! I went to that site you posted, the FAQ's on getting a CA fishing license.

What if Scott had gone out into SF Bay, but had wanted to possibly go beyond the Bay, and keep going, out into the ocean? I mean, maybe he was trying to be prepared for that eventuality.

Not that that boat would be safe to do that in, but then, that boat wasn't really all that safe for what he DID do, was it?


236 posted on 06/28/2004 9:53:45 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson