Ron Granski:" When you can't dazzle them with brilliance, dazzle them with bull"
Please. You have already decided the guy is guilty, and nothing short of forensic proof is going to change your mind. Unfortunately for you, forensic proof is not the standard. Reasonable doubt is.
I have posted to very few of these threads, and then only recently. And every time I have said that I think the guy is guilty. I haven't seen proof of this though.
My personal feelings aren't important, but I think under such circumstances, a jury should be able to find an individual guilty. All this does is shift the burden of proof to the defendent.(Except when the prosecution is seeking the death penalty.)
If he is found Not Guilty....it is over....and no amount of proof can convict him.