Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saudi envoy's Zionist claims 'are offensive'
The Sunday Telegraph ^ | June 27, 2004 | Christopher Hart

Posted on 06/26/2004 4:37:44 PM PDT by MadIvan

The Saudi ambassador to London has reinforced controversial claims by the kingdom's royal family of a link between "Zionists" and recent al-Qaeda terror attacks in the country.

In a television interview, to be broadcast today, Prince Turki al-Faisal is asked about comments made by Crown Prince Abdullah, Saudi Arabia's de facto leader, that "Zionist hands" have been behind the attacks.

The ambassador replies: "When you're under attack by people who come and kill your countrymen and visitors to your country, and you see at the same time an attack on the kingdom from the outside, from Zionist circles, it is natural to make a connection."

He declined to expand on his remarks yesterday but his comments were condemned by Lord Janner of Braunstone, the former Labour MP. "In my view it is highly offensive and he must realise that the statement is totally unfounded."

"No terrorism serves the interests of Zionism. The allegation by the Crown Prince was rubbish and he must know that."

Prince Abdullah made his original remarks when he addressed a conference of leading Saudi officials and academics last month after an attack on contractors at the Yanbu oil facility that left six Westerners - including two Britons - dead.

"Zionism is behind it," he said. "It has become clear now. It has become clear to us. It is not 100 per cent, but 95 per cent that Zionist hands are behind what happened."

In his interview today, Prince Turki contends that Saudi Arabia has been subjected to concerted attacks by "so-called 'experts' with Zionist connections" for 50 years, and particularly since the terror atrocities of September 11, 2001.

"Is it beyond any comprehension or understanding that such attacks come at us from the Zionists on one side and from al-Qaeda on the other side and not make connection between them?" he asked.

The ambassador also says that the families of victims of terror attacks committed in Saudi Arabia, including Westerners, can still insist on the death penalty for their killers under Islamic sharia law, despite the offer of a state amnesty to terrorists who surrender in the next month.

He insists that the regime is doing everything it can to root out terrorists and rejects claims that the Saudi royal family's days are numbered.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: claims; offense; saudi; zionists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Is it just me or do most Arab leaders sound like they've taken one too many hits of LSD? How does one arrive at such nonsense and believe so fervently in it, is beyond me.

Regards, Ivan


1 posted on 06/26/2004 4:37:45 PM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Luircin; Fiddlstix; lainde; Denver Ditdat; Judith Anne; Desdemona; alnick; knews_hound; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 06/26/2004 4:38:05 PM PDT by MadIvan (Ronald Reagan - proof positive that one man can change the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Saudi Arabia is in dire need of Turban Renewal!


3 posted on 06/26/2004 4:42:22 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"When you're under attack by people who come and kill your countrymen and visitors to your country... "



..... you make certain that the War for Infinite Justice is ESCALATED.
Sooner better than later.


4 posted on 06/26/2004 4:47:53 PM PDT by Diogenesis (We do only what we are meant to do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Ivan..They are taking lessons from the Democraps.
If you tell a lie often enough eventually people will believe it's true.
5 posted on 06/26/2004 4:51:13 PM PDT by LuigiBasco (It's past time to restart The Crusades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan; gaspar; Mitchell; Thud

"The ambassador also says that the families of victims of terror attacks committed in Saudi Arabia, including Westerners, can still insist on the death penalty for their killers under Islamic sharia law, despite the offer of a state amnesty to terrorists who surrender in the next month."

Somehow I don't think many will turn themselves in now.


6 posted on 06/26/2004 5:04:03 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

All the ragheads are stupid.


7 posted on 06/26/2004 5:11:31 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Is it just me or do most Arab leaders sound like they've taken one too many hits of LSD?

They are unable to think logically, scientifically. Thus their nations are backward, seething snake pits. Whatever technology and development they have has been done by foreigners. Foreigners built their oil industries. Dar al Islam only takes and with no apologies or regret. Non-Muslims are only good for being suckered and exploited. Finland (9 million people) has a larger GDP than all Arab nations together.

8 posted on 06/26/2004 5:12:53 PM PDT by dennisw (http://www.prophetofdoom.net/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

These assertions are an insult to the very existence of truth. To say that "Zionists" have been behind these attacks and expect people to beleive you, means you can invent your own facts completely independent of reality. I see little difference between the Saudi Kingdom and the regime of the Nazi's... thank god there are no jews currently living in that g-d forsaken country.


9 posted on 06/26/2004 5:16:10 PM PDT by Betaille ("Show them no mercy, for none shall be shown to you")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan


Above: actual image of members of Saudi royal family conducting their war on terrorism

10 posted on 06/26/2004 5:24:48 PM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Some of the Saudi royals still hope that appeasemnt will keep the terrorists from attacking them...though it's a TAD late for that. They're the Arab versions of Blaques Jaques Chirac.


11 posted on 06/26/2004 5:27:31 PM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Silly Abdullah! Everyone knows the real culprit is the Beta Reticuloids!


12 posted on 06/26/2004 5:31:09 PM PDT by Imal (James Kirk is the Bill Clinton of starship captains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
BTW, is he the one that tried to give Rudy Guilliani a $10,000 dollar check...on the condition Rudy blame the Jews for 9/11/01? The check Rudy threw back in his face? There are so many Saudi "princes" that I tend to lose track of the names.
13 posted on 06/26/2004 5:31:13 PM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Imal

It was the Borg. "Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated"


14 posted on 06/26/2004 5:32:54 PM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
Please. They spawned al Qaeda in their Wahabbi vats.
The House of Saud was behind the 911 Atrocities DESPITE the implausible "deniability".
They funded terrorists AFTER the 911 Atrocities.
15 posted on 06/26/2004 5:36:01 PM PDT by Diogenesis (We do only what we are meant to do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Point taken, but I couldn't find a good pic of a mad scientist with a monster in a vat. My memory is getting fuzzy with age...any movie titles we can run?


16 posted on 06/26/2004 5:43:52 PM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Is it blind hatred of the Jews, or is it name-calling at Al-Qaeda? I mean, how better to insult a jihadist than to call him a Zionist?

Ignorant, racist, and absurd, yes. But it is my best guess at a rationale for the assertion.


17 posted on 06/26/2004 5:51:52 PM PDT by watchin (Democratic Party - the political wing of the IRS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb

18 posted on 06/26/2004 5:53:18 PM PDT by Diogenesis (We do only what we are meant to do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb

I had completey forgotten about that episode.


19 posted on 06/26/2004 5:56:11 PM PDT by watchin (Democratic Party - the political wing of the IRS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

GOOD one!


20 posted on 06/26/2004 6:03:53 PM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson