Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Adams jury convicts gun activist on 2 felony counts
Rocky Mountain News ^ | : Jun 25, 2004 | Joe Garner And Hector Gutierrez

Posted on 06/25/2004 7:21:12 AM PDT by AdamSelene235

BRIGHTON - Gun activist Rick Stanley was found guilty Thursday on two felony counts of attempting to influence a public official.

Stanley, 49, owner of a Denver shop-supply company, said he was prepared for the verdict in the trial, which began Monday in Adams County District Court behind double security screening - once at the door of the courthouse and again at the door of the courtroom.

The four-man, eight-woman jury deliberated Wednesday afternoon and Thursday morning, before returning its decision in a fifth-floor courtroom with at least 14 uniformed sheriff's deputies cordoning off Stanley, the attorneys, judge and jury from the public benches.

"I'm never surprised when people allow the government to destroy their rights," Stanley, who remains free on bond until a Sept. 10 sentencing, said outside the Adams County Justice Center as supporters gathered around him.

Diane Szostak, who identified herself as "a militia member from Michigan," said, "It was exactly what we expected from the system because the system is corrupt and it convicts innocent people."

Stanley, organizer of the Mutual Defense Pact Militia, was accused of sending Thornton Municipal Judge Charles J. Rose and 17th Judicial District Judge Donald W. Marshall Jr. a "notice of order" demanding that they reverse his conviction for a weapons violation or face arrest by the militia and a trial for treason.

Rose had convicted Stanley and sentenced him to 90 days in jail for carrying a firearm onto public property while campaigning as a Libertarian in September 2002. Marshall upheld the conviction when Stanley appealed.

"We felt that we had proved the case, and his basic argument was that the government was picking on him, and apparently the jury didn't think that was a sufficient reason to attempt to influence a judge," District Attorney Robert Grant said.

Jury foreman Dan Dionne said the jurors were "cordial and appropriate" in their deliberations.

"Some of us had our minds made up early on, and some of us did not, but it wasn't a matter of ganging up on a holdout or anything like that," Dionne said.

The jury foreman said he asked the jurors to take several preliminary votes as they deliberated.

"There was support for Mr. Stanley, but it was a matter of better understanding what we were passing a verdict on," Dionne said.

Stanley and his lawyers tried to argue that the Thornton ordinance became invalid and his municipal conviction should have been voided after Gov. Bill Owens signed a law last year that limited the ability of local governments to regulate firearms.

Stanley's attorneys argued that one of the law's regulations spelled out that an anti-firearms ordinance that was enacted by a municipality prior to March 2003 was "void and unenforceable."

However, the district attorney said he believed the jury focused its deliberations on whether Stanley committed a crime against the judges.

"I felt that the defense was really a jury nullification defense," Grant said. "It was an attempt to get the jury to disregard the law, which in the end, after they reviewed all of the testimony and the evidence, they did not do."

Deliberations on Wednesday took a strange twist when jurors asked retired Supreme Court Justice Joseph R. Quinn, who presided, if Stanley had access to their names and addresses.

Dionne said some of the jurors were "nervous because of the negative connotations that go with 'militia' nowadays."

After the trial, Stanley said jurors have no cause for alarm.

"I know their names, and I don't care," he said. "I'm not a threat to them or anyone else; but, if attacked, I would defend myself."

Stanley said his defense attorney R. Scott Reisch would appeal Thursday's verdict. Stanley's sentence could range from probation to a maximum of 12 years in prison.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; rickstanley

1 posted on 06/25/2004 7:21:12 AM PDT by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235
Stanley said his defense attorney R. Scott Reisch would appeal Thursday's verdict. Stanley's sentence could range from probation to a maximum of 12 years in prison.

He'll lose this appeal too. Just digging that hole deeper and deeper. Stanley belongs behind bars for the full 12 years.

2 posted on 06/25/2004 7:28:18 AM PDT by Reagan Man (.....................................................The Choice is Clear....... Re-elect BUSH-CHENEY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235

"Stanley, organizer of the Mutual Defense Pact Militia, was accused of sending Thornton Municipal Judge Charles J. Rose and 17th Judicial District Judge Donald W. Marshall Jr. a "notice of order" demanding that they reverse his conviction for a weapons violation or face arrest by the militia and a trial for treason. "


and what is illegal about that?

I DEMAND that the government (fed & state) obey our Constitution or we WILL have a revolution and those in power will be tried for treason against America.

Is that a threat? I consider it the inevitable truth. And it simply follows exactly what our federal laws state.

Look them up. Sedition - Treason - etc...


3 posted on 06/25/2004 7:33:24 AM PDT by steplock (http://www.gohotsprings.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steplock

Stanley doesn't belong in jail, he belongs in a padded room!


4 posted on 06/25/2004 7:35:21 AM PDT by Reagan Man (.....................................................The Choice is Clear....... Re-elect BUSH-CHENEY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235

It's hard to tell what's going on from this article. Must've been written by a public school grad.


5 posted on 06/25/2004 7:38:53 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steplock
I DEMAND that the government (fed & state) obey our Constitution or we WILL have a revolution and those in power will be tried for treason against America. Is that a threat?

Under Section 802 of the USA PATRIOT Act, a person commits the crime of domestic terrorism if within the U.S. they engage in activity that involves acts dangerous to human life that violate the laws of the United States or any State and appear to be intended: (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion

6 posted on 06/25/2004 7:42:14 AM PDT by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235

If you want trouble, call yourself a militia leader and send bogus legal documents to government officials.

You'll get your trouble.


7 posted on 06/25/2004 7:43:42 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list

Bang


8 posted on 06/25/2004 8:19:26 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Bon Appetite!

9 posted on 06/25/2004 11:02:47 AM PDT by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steplock
I DEMAND that the government (fed & state) obey our Constitution or we WILL have a revolution and those in power will be tried for treason against America.

If that is all he wrote, then they are sending the wrong person to prison.

10 posted on 06/25/2004 5:28:25 PM PDT by Mulder (Those who would give up liberty for temporary security, deserve neither -- Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235
Stanley said his defense attorney R. Scott Reisch would appeal Thursday's verdict. Stanley's sentence could range from probation to a maximum of 12 years in prison.

Am I the only one who thinks it absurd that a crime can be considered a "felony" and yet not require any prison time?

11 posted on 06/26/2004 2:25:19 PM PDT by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: supercat
Am I the only one who thinks it absurd that a crime can be considered a "felony" and yet not require any prison time?

Of the 1 in 11 Americans who are convicted felons less than half serve prison time.

12 posted on 06/26/2004 3:35:07 PM PDT by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson