Conspiracy theories--Attempts to cast the war in Iraq as a plot should give its critics pause

Jewish World Review ^ | 6-24-04 | Jonathan Tobin

[SJackson]

There are some people, I am told, who don't believe that 35 years ago, American astronauts landed on the moon. At the same time, other members of the public think that a vast conspiracy has covered up the discovery of UFO-type creatures.

And still others cling to the notion that the CIA killed John F. Kennedy, while a Jewish subset of this sector similarly thinks that Yitzhak Rabin was murdered by the Mossad.

In other words, there are some really dumb people out there, a portion of whom are stark-raving mad.

Conspiracies are the lifeblood of mystery novels and thrillers. They feed into our fear that somehow, all of our troubles can be traced to a small group of malevolent malefactors, whose plots and stratagems are designed to steal our liberties and our money while we innocently sleep.

Such nonsense has helped employ a small army of writers, film crews and actors for generations, with little effect other than to keep those people employed and the weak-minded entertained.

So there should be no surprise about the fact that the Sept. 11 attacks — and the American invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq that followed — would become source material for the same sort of conspiratorial fantasies.

Soon after 9/11, rumors began sweeping the Arab world that the Al Qaeda attacks were the work of Israel. A fable about the Jews who worked in the World Trade Center calling in sick that day became widely accepted. Of course, this attempt to blame a familiar target of Arab intolerance was somewhat paradoxical, since many in the same sector claimed that only the Jews were smart enough to have pulled off such a dastardly and complicated crime.

CRACKPOTS KNOW NO BOUNDARIES

But nutty conspiracy theories are not the sole province of the Jew-haters who seem to dominate the Muslim world these days. Although it would be unfair to draw a straight line between vile Islamic anti-Jewish conspiracy theories and those of the American far left, let's just say that the crackpots of Cairo might find something to talk about with the likes of, say, Tim Robbins or Michael Moore.

Robbins, the Hollywood star/playwright, had his anti-Iraq war satire "Embedded" produced at New York's Public Theater this spring. The play, which portrayed the war as a neoconservative conspiracy, will be remembered chiefly for the fact that, as Wall Street Journal critic Terry Teachout pointed out, Robbins actually used a publication put out by lunatic left-cult leader Lyndon Larouche as the source for a misquote of conservative philosopher Leo Strauss.

As for Moore, his new "documentary" film "Fahrenheit 9/11" is about to open after a huge buildup in the press. The flick, which won the Palme d'Or at this year's Cannes Film Festival, purportedly shows the war to have been a conspiracy cooked up by evil-doers in the White House.

Among the chattering classes, Moore is considered something of a comic genius, though his previous films were more agitprop than wit. I'll leave the skewering of his latest work to others after it comes out. But I will note that any one who could have written in a book, as Moore did in his best-seller "Dude, Where's My Country?" that George W. Bush was behind the 9/11 attacks, or that most Israelis "know they are in the wrong" in defending themselves against Palestinian suicide bombings, is not exactly a trusted source on the subject of the war on terrorism.

Though Moore belongs on the Sci-Fi Channel, his brand of analysis is being treated as the stuff of mainstream debate on C-Span. And that has consequences not just for the upcoming presidential election, but for the sanity of American democracy itself.

After the failure to find Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, the Abu Ghraib prison scandal, ongoing American casualties and with seemingly little progress made toward transforming Iraq into something that resembles a democracy, skepticism about the war is widespread.

Second thoughts about the wisdom of the war are understandable. But they are also a distraction from the real question of whether transforming the Mideast from a hotbed for Islamo-fascism into a beachhead for democracy is practicable. While the cause remains just, the answer to that question remains uncertain, even though it can still be argued that the Middle East is a safer place now that both the Taliban and Saddam Hussein have been toppled.

Yet what is troubling about the undeserved respect given Moore is whether his film and the wacko world of conspiracy that lies behind it will help drive the debate on the war during the presidential campaign. That is clearly the intention of Moore and those who back him, such as the far-left MoveOn.org Web site, which is hoping to push Democratic candidate John Kerry to move from second guesses and sniping at Bush to open opposition to the war.

COMMON-SENSE ADVICE

[SJackson]

If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

[Valin]

Bump