Posted on 06/25/2004 3:54:39 AM PDT by pookie18
The evolution of Michael Moore's new film is fascinating to watch. After winning an award at the Cannes Film Festival, Mr. Moore returned triumphantly to Hollywood and made this statement to reporters on June 9th: "We want the word out. Any attempts to libel me will be met by force. The most important thing we have is the truth on our side. If they persist in telling lies, then I'll take them to court."
"Them" were critics who were questioning the accuracy of Moore's charges against the Bush administration. "Truth" is rock solid information which, apparently, Michael Moore was sure he possessed.
But then a funny thing happened on the way to the Metroplex. The Nine Eleven Commission findings clashed with Moore's thesis that the Bushies had done something dastardly immediately after the attack by letting a bunch of Saudis, including members of the Bin Laden family, fly out of the USA while everybody else was grounded. Apparently, that is not true, at least according to the FBI and the Commissioners, none of whom were jurors at the Cannes Film Festival.
So by June 20, Michael Moore had "evolved" a bit as many in Hollywood tend to do. He said this on an ABC News program: "(The movie) is an op-ed piece. It's my opinion about the last four years of the Bush administration. And what's what I call it. I'm not trying to pretend that this is some sort of, you know, fair and balanced work of journalism."
No mention of truth this time but, as responsible columnists know, all op-ed pieces are supposed to be grounded in truth and facts should be cited in backing up one's op-ed opinion.
Uh-oh.
But just when Michael Moore was foundering in a sea of skepticism, New York Times critic A.O. Scott came to the rescue with this assessment Moore's film: "It might more accurately be said to resemble an editorial cartoon ..."
Paging Shrek! In the space of two weeks the Moore movie had gone from truth to opinion to cartoon, albeit an editorial one.
But the hits just keep on coming. Los Angeles Times film critic Kenneth Turan wrote this about Fahrenheit 9/11: "It is propaganda, no doubt about it, but propaganda is most effective when it has elements of truth ... "
So we're back to the truth now garnished with "elements."
I have seen the first half of Michael Moore's movie and here's the deal. It's slick propaganda that indicts President Bush for a variety of things using cut and paste video interspersed with the opinions of far left people like Democratic Congressmen Jim McDermott and John Conyers. For me, the first sixty minutes were tedious but I have to interview guys like that everyday so I'm jaded.
Any skilled filmmaker, and Moore is that, could fashion a movie making any American look like a pinhead. That's easy to do. Just get a bunch of video, some people who hate the guy, some factoids that may or may not be true, heat it up with sardonic rhetoric and serve. Presto, Fahrenheit 9/11.
So let's stop with the nonsense. If you want to pay 9 bucks to see Moore carve up the President, knock yourself out. But don't be calling me up telling me about truth, or elements thereof. This is rank propaganda and the American public is welcome to it. It will not evolve any further.
O'Reilly has his moments.
This is one of them.
Boycot Hollywood.
Well said.
Richard Clarke approved this.
I saw the title and thought it was about how Mickey Moore evolved from something a cow left in a pasture to resemble....well, something a cow left in a pasture.
PING!
btw--didn't O'Reilly leave in the middle of the film--and was confronted by Moore as he left? Moore should be fined for blocking a fire exit with his girth.
LOL, I was thinking along the same lines. I do not believe in evolution, but if I ever did, Moore would be the missing link.
"Richard Clarke approved this."
Actually I think Richard Clarke directed people to take those actions and not simply "approved" of them.
"Any attempts to libel me will be met by force."
He means, "Any attempt to disagree with me will be met by force."
There it is, folks. The Democratic Party summed up in one sentence.
"Richard Clarke approved this."
Yes, and he admitted that the decision went no further up the chain of command than he. If Clarke could pin the mistake on Bush he certainly would have during his testimony to the 9/11 Commission.
Michael Moore = Big Fat Idiot.
O'Reilly left after an hour because the film started 40 minutes late. He said he had a prior commitment. Nothing sinister, as some in the press have implied.
He Is?
Could have fooled me.
Can you imagine the reaction of the Demons, if, someone had made a movie of Bill Clinton comparable to Farenheit 911, while Clinton was still President. Of course, the filmmaker would not have to made up lies to make this movie about Clinton. He could have actually used the truth.
O'Reilly and Hannity can't get air time with Moore...or so it seems. I think they ought to use his tactics and ambush him with cameras and a barrage of questions like is he want to do to embarrass people and make them look bad.
Take it for what it's worth: one ham's opinion.
http://www.mercuryradioarts.com/site/product?pid=10047#
Here's a description of the t-shirt they're selling:
What can be said about Michael Moore? His communist views and anti-Bush rhetoric are so laughable, it isn't even worth debating him. So why not boil it down to what's really important: Michael Moore is Fat. That's why you need this "Michael Moore is Fat" T-Shirt! This heavyweight white T-Shirt was produced in a third-world sweatshop and then imprinted with a precise artistic drawing of Michael Moore on the front and the Glenn Beck Program logo on the left sleeve. Get it today!
No mention of truth this time but, as responsible columnists know, all op-ed pieces are supposed to be grounded in truth and facts should be cited in backing up one's op-ed opinion.
Michael Moore's brain is FUBAR ping.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.