Posted on 06/25/2004 12:01:18 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
It was shocking news that Patrick J. Buchanan, Ronald Reagan's communications director, is getting $500,000 to write a Bush-bashing book to be titled, "Where the Right Went Wrong." The New York Post quoted a publishing insider as saying, "They could put Michael Moore on the jacket of this book, and people would believe he wrote it." But the Post story also said the book "is scheduled to go on sale in early August, to coincide with the start of the Republican National Convention – at which Buchanan will be a commentator for MSNBC."
With the exception of Joe Scarborough's show, MSNBC has been drifting to the left. Pat Buchanan used to have a show on MSNBC but it was given the axe. He now serves as an analyst and sits in for Scarborough on occasion. On many occasions, Buchanan's comments are fitting and newsworthy. He was a key figure in Reagan's battle against Soviet communism and provided insightful commentary on the former president's legacy and career. But now that global Islam has replaced communism as a worldwide enemy, Buchanan has become a critic of the U.S. response.
Buchanan has contributed so much to the conservative movement that he is certainly entitled to write a book critical of those conservatives who back the Bush policy on Iraq. But MSNBC's coverage of the presidential campaign will tilt even further to the left if Buchanan also assumes the role of Bush-basher. Plus, there are disturbing indications that Buchanan, who left the Republican Party in 2000, may even back Ralph Nader for president.
Buchanan's American Conservative Magazine featured a front-page article, "Ralph Nader: Conservatively Speaking. The long-time progressive makes a pitch for the disenfranchised Right." The magazine explained, "Ralph Nader recently accepted Pat Buchanan's invitation to sit down with us and explain why his third-party presidential bid ought to appeal to conservatives disaffected with George W. Bush." On social issues, Nader is pro-abortion, pro-gay rights and pro-gay marriage. He is also pro-hemp. Nader's press guy is Kevin Zeese, formerly of NORML, the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.
Sounding conservative in the Buchanan interview, however, Nader attacked "corporate pornography" and "anything-goes values." He called for a crackdown on "rampant corporate pornography and violence directed to children and separating children from their parents and undermining parental authority." He talked at length about protecting American sovereignty. In a direct appeal, Nader said, "I'm not expecting conservatives to change their minds on certain issues that we disagree on, but if we look at the issues where we have common positions, they reach a level of gravity that would lead conservatives to stop being taken for granted by the corporate Republicans and send them a message by voting for my independent candidacy."
But any appeal Nader may have had to conservatives seems to have gone down the tubes with Nader's selection of socialist Peter Camejo as his running mate. Described in many accounts as a businessman and a "Green activist," he was the presidential candidate in 1976 of the Socialist Workers Party, which was founded by Trotskyists who had broken from the Socialist Party of the USA. The pick was widely viewed as an effort by Nader to appeal to the far left of the Democratic Party, not the Buchanan crowd.
On the matter of his new book, the New York Post says Buchanan is particularly scornful of a U.S. foreign policy that has "ignited a war of civilizations" with the Islamic world. Traditional conservative Morgan Norval, a former U.S. Marine and author of "The Triumph of Disorder," says the clash of civilizations between Islam and the West was ignited by Islamic fundamentalism. He calls Islam the successor to communism in the effort to establish a global dictatorship.
The terrorists confirm this. Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the Jordanian-born terrorist and al-Qaida associate whose group claimed responsibility for the beheading of American Nicholas Berg and South Korean Kim Sun-Il, says the terrorism will continue "until Islamic rule is back on Earth."
Yet Buchanan's magazine sounds increasingly like a left-wing publication with its constant talk of America's "empire" around the world. This is a variation of the old Soviet line that the U.S. wants to dominate and control the world. It's disconcerting to see conservatives who played key roles in fighting communism using such noxious terminology. But if you watch MSNBC, you better get used to it.
Pat Buchanan is pond scum; he's trying to make his money up front, in case Bush loses. Because if Bush loses, nobody will be interested in what Patsie has to say anymore.
You have to wonder why Pat and Bay are doing everything they can do to get Bush out of office.
Bitterness is terrible isn't it?
Patrick J. Buchanan, "principled Conservative", soon to be toesucking Naderite, and currently leader of the Pitchfork Brigade"..... ~PING~
The enemy within. If he jumps on Nader's bandwagon, good riddance.
now in choosing their Demonrat commentators, they pick the most loyal Rats around...
then the viewing public is getting a false picture of GOP ideas, let alone conservative ideas..
I hate Buchanan with a passion that is nearing clintonian levels.....
Oh, yes......I forgot how "principled" he is!!
Don't make me laugh, I'll wake up my dogs!
Go Pat go....as far away from the GOP as possible. And please take your quasi-commie fellow travelers with you...ALL of them.
I give you Bob Novak, a REGISTERED Democrat!
BINGO!
I'm glad you noticed the phrase in quotes, it's sort of a reminder to all that he's not who he says he is. The article cites his "change of heart" in 2000, I think it goes back much further than that, my guess is in 1992.
Easy -- Pat's basic anti-semitism has trumped his "conservative" judgment. Hence, such inanities as his whining about Bush igniting a "clash of civilizations," as if the Islamic scum we are fighting actually merited the honorific "civilized," his incessant bleating about the "Israeli Lobby and their Amen corner in the U.S.," and his irrational nativism, finally unmasked as pure unadulterated bigotry.
Pat is truly a "paleocon," the face of conservatism before it was made intellectually respectable by William F. Buckley and Barry Goldwater and humanized by Ronald Reagan.
Just another reminder that when someone on the right goes around the bend, they can actually pop out from the far left.
I think he's actually in it for personal power and to hell with how badly he damages America while he chases that spotlight :-(
Exactly my thoughts on Buchanan as well! It's unfortunate the sort of "hate America first" behaviour he's been exhibiting.
This seals the deal. For years now I've pointed out how the far-left and the far-right overlap. This is proof positive. Buchanan is openly siding with not only the Left (which truly constitute our enemy within), but also with Islam in saying how we should side with it? Oh, my LORD in Heaven!
I don't know what else to say...
$710.96... The price of freedom.
Buckley, Goldwater and Reagan never left the reservation like Buchanan currently has been for over a decade. True, they were all paleocons, but Buckley, Goldwater, and Reagan never strayed past the fence line on the Conservative reservation like Buchanan did, flirting with Nader, a SOCIALIST, of all people.
Ever since Clinton buddy and ex-CNN head Rick Kaplan took over at MSNBC, they've gotten more and more left. I used to respect, if not like, Chris Matthews, because he used to try to be fair. Now, he's got five liberals for every conservative on his show, it seems. Keith Olbermann is a bitter joke, and Joe Scarborough has been neutered. And it's certainly not much of a left-right battle with Buchanan and Press, when both of them constantly battle Bush. MSNBC might as well call themselves the low-budget CNN, because that's what they are.
More and more I'm starting to see Palestinian flags being waved at leftist demonstrations. Pat should be at home over there.
I remember reading an article when the new head of MSNBC was announced and that article said Scarborough was told by the incoming head of MSNBC to cut back on his Conservative stuff and opt for more of a moderate balance, and there's no such thing as a left-right between Buchanan and Press when they both nod and agree with each other on just about every issue. I agree, MSNBC is for what little it's worth is nothing more than a low-budget CNN.
This just makes me sick to my stomach; I never liked Buchanan, but to let his hatred of the Jews do this to a party he claimed he loved is beyond the pale.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.