Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry Pushes Broadband Access, Wins Over Iacocca
Reuters ^

Posted on 06/24/2004 6:05:31 PM PDT by Pikamax

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: Pikamax
I think everyone should have digital cable, a humidor stocked with Arturo Fuentes and a bottomless casque of Maker's Mark.

Vote for me.

Lefties are funny.

21 posted on 06/24/2004 6:34:55 PM PDT by Mr. Buzzcut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer
Bush is bully on broadband.
22 posted on 06/24/2004 6:35:35 PM PDT by TomServo ("I'm so upset that I'll binge on a Saltine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

I thought Bush has been pushing this for some time.


23 posted on 06/24/2004 6:38:01 PM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: a core set of principles from which he will not deviate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: get'emall
Maybe 20 years ago he was.

Bush banked on Iacocco Puffs in 2000 and it didn't work. Gore countered with Japan bashing and it worked.

24 posted on 06/24/2004 6:41:36 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("Dirty White Boy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
He ignored them in a very deliberate way. He gave ridiculous speeches, for instance, in a farm field about how an extra $10 billion in farm exports would turn our $10 trillion economy around. He gave an economic speech in a truck depot in front of boxes with fake "made in America" labels. He gave an economic speech in Alabama about how more government spending on eduaction would lead to jobs at the Honda plant. At the Waco economic forum VP Cheney attended session the on technology, not GWB, and he didn't say a word. Not one economic speech was given in a high tech center, nor was tech ever mentioned positively in an economic speech. High tech was the growth engine of our economy all during the Reagan expansion. It deserved better.

Two things turned our economy around. The 9/11 attacks forced Greenspan to end his war on wealth and full employment, and the second Bush tax cut, which was largely crafted by Republicans in congress, not the White House.

25 posted on 06/24/2004 6:50:13 PM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62; All

Which Kerry will get rid of if he is elected.


26 posted on 06/24/2004 6:51:43 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dane

My K-Car was well-nigh indestructible, despite the fact that I gave it precious little maintenance and drove it like an SOB.

I was a law school student and couldn't afford any better, but damn if that car wasn't well built. No AC, though--ACK!


27 posted on 06/24/2004 6:54:24 PM PDT by Petronski (Ronald Reagan: 1015 electoral votes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

You're probably right, unless Republicans maintain their majorities in congress, then we can go back to the good old days of gridlock, however I wouldn't trade that for getting the terrorist's choice for president.


28 posted on 06/24/2004 6:55:39 PM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer
Before everyone starts simultaneously having apopleptic fits, I do believe this admistration has called for the same measure.

And this is supposed to be a good thing? Why doesn't Bush & Co. just STFU, get the hell out of the way, fully deregulate telecommunications and let real, normal people carry the ball instead of the damn politicians and fatass bureaucrats? Big Stupid Government is still ordering parts for 20+ year-old systems! They are clueless about how to inexpensively implement cutting-edge technology.

Look at our cellphone infrastructure - years behind most of Asia and Europe, thanks to Big Stupid Government and their "need" to regulate and control every damn thing they can think of.

29 posted on 06/24/2004 6:56:19 PM PDT by Hank Rearden (Refuse to let anyone who could only get a government job tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
My K-Car was well-nigh indestructible, despite the fact that I gave it precious little maintenance and drove it like an SOB

Well sometimes one gets an orange in a bagful of lemons. Most people I knew who bought them had trouble with them and those Horizon/Omni cars were just as bad.

30 posted on 06/24/2004 7:03:09 PM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

This article demonstrates how inane politicians are about the American electorate. First universal broadband is catchy but the reality is it goes where the demand is. I live in a rural town with a population of 75 and never expected to see broadband having used dialup for several years. I now have DSL with a choice of three download speeds. (I have 650 kbps but can go to 1.3 mbps if needed by paying a higher rate.)

The reality is if you don't have the hardware you probably don't need broadband. It's just another entitlement buzzword. We are still paying the Al Gore internet tax on our phone bills and I'm not sure what we've gotten for it.

Iacocca is the typical fat cat big business type who has lived off of the sugar tit of the US Government for most of his career. He is a perfect example of what PR can do when you have money to pay for it. The socalled Chrysler turnaround was nothing more than a big federal bailout that should never been permitted to occur. As a small business owner who will celebrate our companies' 20th anniversary on August 1 I have never taken a federal subsidy for anything. I've created jobs and have seen growth because our employees believe in what we are doing. Big companies have the power of money but smaller companies often have the power of inovation and ideas. I'm glad Kerry has those types in his corner. They represent the relics of a stagnant America that has seen history pass them by.


31 posted on 06/24/2004 7:06:33 PM PDT by SageofRugby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

How's this for an answer: The government should not interfere with business nor should it help business.


32 posted on 06/24/2004 7:07:36 PM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace (I'm from the government and I'm here to help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

I remember your shrill posts about the tech industry from a few months back. How do you like this: Some tech companies did improve our productivity, but many others are fad companies who rode the wave of the internet boom. The government shouldn't bail them out.


33 posted on 06/24/2004 7:09:38 PM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace (I'm from the government and I'm here to help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Remarks by the President in Meeting with High-Tech Leaders
March 28, 2001

... I first want you all to know that this administration has great confidence in the future of our technology industry. We recognize, like you do, that the stock market may be sending a little different message right now; that people have suffered losses and there are some difficult times for some of the companies in the high-tech world. But the accomplishments of the industry are rock-solid. The future is incredibly bright.

You've changed the way we work and communicate, and you've changed the way we learn. You've done for America -- economic leadership in the 21st century what heavy industry did for America in the 20th century. And all the difficulties you face today really don't cloud a future that is so optimistic and bright.

The social benefits from the tech industry are as sweeping as the economic potential -- telemedicine for the sick, distance learning and assistive technology for individuals with disabilities, for example. Your companies symbolize the innovation and optimism of this great nation. Your success fills us all with confidence in the continued growth of our economy.

You make us all a little prouder to be Americans. You've done so much for your country, it's time for your country to do something for you. I oftentimes say that the role of government is not to create wealth, it's to create an environment which the entrepreneurial spirit can continue to flourish.

First things first: We've got to restore consumer confidence. We can help in Washington by returning tax money to the people who pay the bills this year. We can restore investor confidence by building a better business environment for years to come, starting with having a realistic, sound energy policy -- a policy that says, of course, we can conserve better, but we need new supplies. We need to aggressively seek new supplies. And not only do we need new supplies of natural gas, for example, we need new pipelines to move natural gas. We need new power plants. We need an aggressive, forward-thinking energy policy that balances the needs of our environment with the needs of the people of the country.

Link</a.

You should really do a google search before you put your foot in your mouth, Moonman.

34 posted on 06/24/2004 7:09:54 PM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace

In a perfect world, Clinton/Rubin wouldn't have pushed for a ruinous strong dollar policy, and Greenspan would have recognized that the end of Y2K spending would have put the brakes on our economy without his "help." GWB would have recognized that our economy was suffering from a drop in business spending (which mostly goes for technology), not consumer spending.


35 posted on 06/24/2004 7:12:27 PM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

I prefer a GOP congress and a GOP Presidency. Not a rat in the whitehouse.. A rat could nominate a bad judge.


36 posted on 06/24/2004 7:12:34 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden

Up here in the sticks all I can get is ISDN and that is after millions in state and federal monies went to telecommunications companies with the mandate to expand newer digital services to the rural communities.

NOANET ( http://www.noanet.net/home-flash.shtml - "adavanced telecom and data transport for rural communities" ) was built, but still no DSL, Cable or even wireless. Fiber is close, but limited to POPs and "city" installations.


37 posted on 06/24/2004 7:18:32 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (Veritas vos liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Good grief, do they even have I-Owe-kaka's FBI files?


38 posted on 06/24/2004 7:28:07 PM PDT by OldFriend (IF YOU CAN READ THIS, THANK A TEACHER.......AND SINCE IT'S IN ENGLISH, THANK A SOLDIER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Lee Iococain is a tard.

The early mustang was a falcon with a swopy body. A real sheep in wolves clothing.

As noted, the K Kars were Krap. Note that the new Krysler Komercials are rejecting everything Lee stands for in auto motive design.

Iococain spent as much time promoting himself as he did the company. A real egomaniac. He and Kerry deserve each other.


39 posted on 06/24/2004 7:28:27 PM PDT by AlbertWang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
said he liked Kerry's plans to give all Americans a fair shot at a well-paying job.

All Americans?? All??? What utter BS.

The premise behind this statement is that everyone DESERVES a well-paying job. Here's a news flash for ya: The reason SOME jobs are well-paying is because not a whole hell of a lot of people can do them. That's why there are so many LOW-paying jobs....most people CAN do them.

Simply breathing and applying for a job does not mean you deserve a well-paying job.

And the unavoidable facts of economics will show you that if you woke up tomorrow and EVERYONE had a well-paying job and had more $$$ from those well-paying jobs, then the prices of everything would rise....making those 'well-paying' jobs not well-paying at all.

No wonder economics isn't taught in the schools anymore. If it was the Democrats' bogus promises of "high wages for all" would be laughed off the stage.

40 posted on 06/24/2004 7:30:21 PM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson