Skip to comments.
Bill: Hil eyes
run for Prez
New York Daily News ^
| 6/24/04
Posted on 06/24/2004 1:59:20 AM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
1
posted on
06/24/2004 1:59:20 AM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
"She doesn't want to be President this time," he said --
Yeh, right. And you slept on the couch.
2
posted on
06/24/2004 2:04:13 AM PDT
by
beyond the sea
(anyone who says he can see through women is missing alot)
To: kattracks
One of the last things Bill Clinton would ever want is for Hillary to be President.
Of course she would be a disaster for this country but she would be more of a
disaster for his legacy. Can anyone imagine what it would be like for him if he
had to play second fiddle to that wench?
3
posted on
06/24/2004 2:12:12 AM PDT
by
leadpenny
To: kattracks
"She's now where I was in 1988," Clinton told ABC's "Good Morning America."Or more like where Hitler was in 1932.
4
posted on
06/24/2004 2:21:32 AM PDT
by
Caipirabob
(Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
To: kattracks
Sen. Clinton's spokesman, Philippe Reines, said, "Sen. Clinton is doing everything she can to elect John Kerry President." Gee Bill, we already know you're a good liar, you don't have to tell another lie to prove it!
5
posted on
06/24/2004 3:14:40 AM PDT
by
dawn53
To: kattracks
There's no doubt Hillary will be running in 2008. Right now the Clintons are focused on doing everything they can to do stop Kerry cold.
6
posted on
06/24/2004 3:18:52 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: dawn53
Hillary is giving lip service to party unity. But she knows she'd rather be the one on top instead of that worn-out Senate hack.
7
posted on
06/24/2004 3:20:03 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: kattracks
"She doesn't want to be President this time," he said, referring to the 2004 race. He added that "she would be a great President."
Hmmm. I wonder which is the bigger lie.
8
posted on
06/24/2004 3:33:09 AM PDT
by
laredo44
(Liberty is not the problem..)
To: kattracks
Bianca Reilly, 63, a former teacher from the Bronx, had tears in her eyes as she walked out of the bookstore clutching a signed copy of Clinton's memoirs. Put some ice on it.
To: kattracks
It would be great to see Rudy defeating Hillary as Senator in 2006.
To: kattracks
He added that "she would be a great President." Right. For those imbeciles who loved Billy, they'll adore Hilly!
Four to eight years more of Clintonism would complete the job of destroying America.
11
posted on
06/24/2004 3:58:57 AM PDT
by
JesseHousman
(Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
To: Dubya's fan
No, the best person to defeat the Clintons would be Mr Ashcroft. If he were to reopen the investigations into the activities of those losers and find out the truth (and prosecute in criminal court), then just maybe the 'toons would get the Full Mussolini that they so desperately deserve.
If nothing else, seeing these two doing the "perp walk" in some orange coveralls would be wonderful.
12
posted on
06/24/2004 4:03:22 AM PDT
by
datura
(Battlefield justice is what our enemies deserve. If you win, you live. If you lose, you die.)
To: datura
John Ashcroft can't do because if he did, he would have to resign. The media would say he's attacking innocents, the President should fire him, and all is a right-wing vast conspiracy.
To: beyond the sea
"This is a record-breaking number for a work of nonfiction, Sonny Mehta, president of the Knopf Publishing Group, said." I guess that is the trick: learning how to classify this "work."
To: dawn53
Gee Bill, we already know you're a good liar, you don't have to tell another lie to prove it! Yup. And here's yet another lie:
"When I didn't run in 1988, I thought I would never get another chance to run because I thought the Democrats were going to win."
15
posted on
06/24/2004 4:28:29 AM PDT
by
libertylover
(The Constitution is a roadmap to liberty. Let's start following it again.)
To: Dubya's fan
It would be great to see Rudy defeating Hillary as Senator in 2006. Hmmm. That's one thought. But if Rudy runs for the Senate in 2006, win or lose he won't be available for the 2008 presidential run and I don't see anybody else.
16
posted on
06/24/2004 4:32:32 AM PDT
by
libertylover
(The Constitution is a roadmap to liberty. Let's start following it again.)
To: libertylover
Condi/Jeb or Jeb/Condi against Hillary in 2008. Although she loses his Senate seat in 2006, she will run for President sure.
To: kattracks
"This is a record-breaking number for a work of nonfiction," Sonny Mehta, president of the Knopf Publishing Group, said.
haha...BWAAHHAAAHAAHA...BWAAHAHAAAHAHAH!<*snort*><*gasp*>
18
posted on
06/24/2004 4:37:23 AM PDT
by
Nachoman
To: libertylover
"When I didn't run in 1988, I thought I would never get another chance to run because I thought the Democrats were going to win." Certainly it would have been possible for a Democrat to think the Democrats were going to win in 1988. But that would have implied "I would never get another chance to run" exactly why? He certainly would have been young enough to run - indeed did run - in 1996 . . . Maybe he figured that the feds would investigate Whitewater before 1996?
To: Dubya's fan
"It would be great to see Rudy defeating Hillary as Senator in 2006."
That is the only way that this show ends. This is why it is so important for a Bush win now.
20
posted on
06/24/2004 4:57:46 AM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(How can you trust a man who will not risk his own Senate seat for a run at the presidency?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson