Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cronos
It wasn't exactly "forced" on them. What had happened is the Persians had earlier brutally conquered a chunk of the Middle East. The Arabs arrived on the scene in the nick of millenial time frames and tossed them out.

The Persian leadership elite was no more popular among the Persian people than it had been among the conquered people.

At the time, the religion adjustment was a minor issue (all things considered).

24 posted on 06/23/2004 5:26:15 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah
What had happened is the Persians had earlier brutally conquered a chunk of the Middle East. The Arabs arrived on the scene in the nick of millenial time frames and tossed them out.

Not really. The Persians were not the brutal conquerors you make them out to be. Cyrus the Great was pretty benevolent to the Jews you know. The Assyrians were cruel and so were the Babylonians. The Persians conquered them and then conquered Egypt. however, they were then knocked out by the Eastern Roman Empire. The Persians at the time of theArab invasion was Iraq eastwards, not Arabia.

The REligious readjustment was a major issue as Iranis were Zoroastrians, not people of the book (Jews and Christians) and could be slaughtered and were slaughtered like the Hindus were a bit later on.
25 posted on 06/23/2004 6:12:57 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson