Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ready for $60-a-Barrel Oil? [The Iranian election strategy at work, by Michael Ledeen]
National Review Online ^ | June 22, 2004, | Michael Ledeen

Posted on 06/22/2004 6:31:13 AM PDT by Constitution Day

Ready for $60-a-Barrel Oil?
The Iranian election strategy at work.

So the Iranians seized some British "warships" yesterday, and arrested eight British naval officers. That's what the Iranians announced in the morning, and that's all we've heard. The chatterers were agog. Why would the Iranians do such a crazy thing? Do they really want war (If that isn't a good old-fashioned causus belli, what is?)? Etc.

Yes, they're crazy, no doubt. But they're not stupid. And if an Iranian action seems stupid, you're probably misinterpreting it. There's a perfectly straightforward explanation for the whole episode: The Brits were laying down a network of sensors to detect the movement of ships toward major Iraqi oil terminals. The Iranians considered that a bit of a threat. So they attacked.

And why, you might ask, did the Iranians feel threatened?

Because they were planning to attack (or have their surrogates attack) the oil terminals, silly.

And why attack the oil terminals?

Because they want to defeat President Bush in November, and they figure if they can get the price of oil up to around $60 a barrel, he'll lose to Kerry.

Not to mention a considerable side benefit: At $60 a barrel, they can buy whatever they may be lacking to get their atomic bombs up and running.

It's not that hard to understand the mullahs once you learn to think as they do, and understand their hopes and fears.

What do they hope? That Bush will lose; that the Coalition will collapse; that they can dominate Iraq and create an Islamic republic in the Iranian image. That will expand their power in the region, totally demoralize the internal democratic opposition, and drive America from the Middle East, thereby permitting them to complete their nuclear-weapons program at their leisure. A dream come true.

What do they fear? Above all, their own people. (And a free, relatively stable Iraq would inspire the Iranian people to demand the same freedom for themselves, meaning the end of the mullahcracy). An aggressive American policy in support of democratic revolution in Iran, for the same reason. A collapse in oil prices. The reelection of George W. Bush.

So you see at once the bases of Iranian policy: Drive oil prices up and the Americans out of Iraq, whatever the cost. The Brits were in the way, blocking easy access for saboteurs to the Iraqi oil facilities. Ergo the "crazy" action. Which turns out to be not so crazy at all.

And one other thing: The Iranians figure they've got the Brits under control, because the Brits have lots of contracts with them. Thus far, the Brits have behaved like good little boys, forestalling any effective steps to get in the way of the nuclear program, and lobbying the Bush administration to be "reasonable" and "patient." You can be sure that the British foreign office has every confidence that no harm will come to their officers, and that the incident will be resolved quickly and even amiably.

Not crazy at all. In fact, they're winning.

If anybody cares, it's a good bet that Iranian-sponsored hit squads will be going after lots of oil terminals and refineries in the next couple of months.

But it's hard to find anyone who cares. I guess we can afford $60 a barrel, and I suppose Foggy Bottom and the CIA will be able to manage a nuclear Iran. Right?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: energy; energyprices; iran; iraqioil; michaelledeen; oil; southwestasia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: atomicpossum

Great tag line


41 posted on 06/22/2004 8:00:16 AM PDT by Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit (Tax energy not labor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Independentamerican

I think Bush WILL wait until after the election. Then, watch the gloves come off!


42 posted on 06/22/2004 8:00:22 AM PDT by Az. Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz

Really? Extra production that was not online at $40 is suddenly going to appear? On what planet do you live my friend?

The only country to keep spare capacity is Saudi Arabia. In countries in which the free market functions appropriately, spare capacity is just wasted investment. There is none in any of the places you mentioned. Only additional investment and 5 to 10 years of construction will bring more on line. And now, even the Saudis are pumping at nearly full capacity. Don't make ridiculous and utterly nonsensical statments.


43 posted on 06/22/2004 8:04:40 AM PDT by Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit (Tax energy not labor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Bush can't preemptively attack Iran right now - he would lose the election if that happened, the base would stay with him, but that's not enough to win, the independents would all go to Kerry.


44 posted on 06/22/2004 8:08:13 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Freedom of Speech Wins

US troops aren't leaving Iraq any time soon.

those "massing" iranian troops don't concern me at all, if there is anything we know with certainty, is that our military can decimate any standard military formation on the battlefield. we have problems with street fighting, IEDs, etc.


45 posted on 06/22/2004 8:10:23 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: hoot2

That's one beautiful shotgun.


46 posted on 06/22/2004 8:36:22 AM PDT by Constitution Day (Burger-Eating War Monkey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Pong


47 posted on 06/22/2004 11:42:16 AM PDT by nuconvert ("America will never be intimidated by thugs and assassins." ( Azadi baraye Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Oil reached $40+ a barrel in the early 80's. 25 years later, its still less than that amount. All this whining is just that - whining.

The reason that gas is as cheap as it is relates to advanced in technology for refining and shipping. In general, oil and gas are much cheaper now than they have been in the past, once adjusted for inflation.
48 posted on 06/22/2004 11:44:05 AM PDT by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

Can someone please explain to me why the US rig count went down 16 rigs last week? And I'm not talking about Canadian rigs that do not work during the late spring and summer.


49 posted on 06/22/2004 11:49:30 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
I wasn't even aware that we imported any Iranian oil?

...well, maybe through 3rd parties or other back door channels?

50 posted on 06/22/2004 11:51:04 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

We don't.

http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/petroleum_supply_monthly/current/pdf/table49.pdf


51 posted on 06/22/2004 2:12:06 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty
"Gasoline prices slipped a fraction of a cent to $1.559 a gallon."

Where is this at, it certainly isn't in AZ where prices still hover around $2.00 a gallon.

52 posted on 06/22/2004 2:17:41 PM PDT by DaiHuy (MUST HAVE JUST BEEN BORN THAT WAY...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Well, I learned something new today.

We have an Energy Information Administration.

Great source.
-Thanks-

53 posted on 06/22/2004 4:19:20 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Price shocks are probably inevitable, but Iran needs to be put down, and Bush is the only person who might do something about it.
54 posted on 06/22/2004 4:42:57 PM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
The notion that Iran simply didn't like the idea of British sailors carrying out a covert military mission in Iranian waters is apparently beyond the author's infantile mental capabilities.

I agree with you it's a silly article, but even I doubt the Brits laying motion detectors in the Shatt al Arab. The Iraqi oil terminals are not in the Shatt al Arab, they are a fair distance offshore, where the water is deep enough for VLCCs to approach. If the Iranians really wanted to launch an attack of some sorts against the terminals, they have plenty of coastline that belongs exclusivly to them. No need to use a waterway that they only control half of.

55 posted on 06/22/2004 5:41:54 PM PDT by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

If oil went to $60 a barrel, alternate energy sources become very appealing, like coal gassification and natural gas powered engines. I'm far more concerned about insane Islamism acquiring a nuke ... and Iran is cooperating with Osama and al Qaeda at every opportunity.


56 posted on 06/22/2004 5:49:48 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...

If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.


57 posted on 06/23/2004 5:30:35 AM PDT by SJackson (They're not Americans. They're just journalists, Col George Connell, USMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

bump


58 posted on 06/23/2004 5:37:28 AM PDT by BayouCoyote (The 1st victim of islam is the person who practices it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

"That translates into $5-$6 a gallon. President Bush may be looking for another job in November if he doesn't nip in the bud Iranian efforts to jack up the price of oil and destabilize the Middle East fast."


Um.... at $40 a barrel, gas is at ~ $2 a gallon.

Linearly, $60 a barrel would be $3 a gallon.


59 posted on 06/23/2004 6:45:00 AM PDT by adam_az (Call your State Republican Party office and VOLUNTEER!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson