1 posted on
06/21/2004 10:46:53 PM PDT by
kattracks
To: kattracks
"factually inaccurate...not a shred of evidence..." Where have we heard that before?
2 posted on
06/21/2004 10:55:49 PM PDT by
Sauce
To: kattracks
CBS is rapidly going from being politically biased to being journalistically corrupt. Here we have the impeached one himself accidentally on tape admitting what turned out to be a major blunder, and Dan Rather covers his ears with both hands, yelling, "I DON'T WANT TO HEAR IT! I DON'T WANT TO HEAR IT."
Both the New York Times and The Associated Press gave about the worst book reviews imaginable to Clinton's 950-page yawn-a-thon, yet Dan Rather rated it five stars, LOL!
To: kattracks
For the most part, the past four years have been pleasant not having to listen to Bill Clinton lying and spinning things on a daily, if not hourly basis. Here we go again, immersed in all the sewage he brings to anyting in which he involves himself.
I may be the lone wolf, but I think this book tour is the start of his conquest to become the next Secretary General of the UN. Its the only way he retain any sort of power that will disrupt and maim the lives of his fellow human beings.
To: kattracks
9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said two days later that at the time of Clinton's interrogation, he was unaware that staffers had obtained a videotape of Clinton's 2002 speech where he detailed the Sudanese offer. Interesting that every Freeper and conservative talk show host in America was aware of the videotape, but I'm not surprised Kerrey hadn't heard of it. But then I wouldn't be surprised if Kerrey couldn't find his @ss with both hands.
7 posted on
06/21/2004 11:43:43 PM PDT by
randog
(Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
To: kattracks
Just for kicks, I Googled® for the search phrase 'Shred of evidence AND Clinton'.
I received several hundred pages worth of hits covering such topics as the Sudan/Osama deal, Monica Lewinsky, Rose Law Firm, FBI files, the LORAL ballistic missile guidance technology transfer authorization to China, Vince Foster, stolen embroidered bath towels from a US Navy aircraft carrier by Clinton staffers, White House travel office, White Water, Paula Jones, that dead Starbucks girl, Mena airport, Branch Davidians, Ron Brown, OKC bombing, TWA Flight 800, and on and on and on.
If we're taking requests for catch phrases we never want to hear again after 2004, I humbly submit 'Shred of Evidence'.
14 posted on
06/22/2004 1:09:07 AM PDT by
The KG9 Kid
(Semper Fi)
To: kattracks
... counting the minutes till dan rather is off the payroll as a clinton / dem crazy policy / castro / etc. shill ...
16 posted on
06/22/2004 1:22:41 AM PDT by
GretchenM
(A country is a terrible thing to waste. Vote Republican.)
To: kattracks
17 posted on
06/22/2004 4:04:33 AM PDT by
jmstein7
(A Judge not bound to the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
To: kattracks
Did anyone catch O'Reilly last night? He had on Richard Miniter and Toon apparatchik P.J. Crowley. UBL and what Toon did/didn't do to get him was the subject of the discussion. Miniter laid out how Toon had nine opportunities to get UBL, three with Predator strikes. Toon chose each time not to authorize. Crowley tried to talk about Bush, and O'Reilly stopped him. Tried to hem and haw. O'Reilly stopped him. Tried to argue that the Predator vid was inconclusive. Miniter just laid out the facts. At the end of the segment, O'Reilly asked Miniter who had custody of the vid. Miniter mentioned that the 9-11 Commission could have access to it if it wanted, but that the vid should still be with the CIA. O'Reilly was going to make some phone calls today and said he'd keep us updated. He wants to show the video. So much for Toon's lies.
19 posted on
06/22/2004 4:20:32 AM PDT by
mewzilla
To: kattracks
20 posted on
06/22/2004 5:33:20 AM PDT by
truthandlife
("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
To: kattracks
What are Dan Rather's financial interests in CBS, its parent company, and Simon and Schuster? Are there any records of legal dealings with Clinton regarding future profit percentages or royalties from the sale of this book or of Hillary's? Are there any linkages between Rather relatives and the Clintonistas? Does anyone know?
Maybe all we really have to do is follow the money. It might be just that simple.
To: kattracks
My goodness!! It appears that Slick Willie has a bit of a quagmire here.......
24 posted on
06/22/2004 9:15:36 AM PDT by
GeorgeW23225
(Liberals really aren*t bad people. It*s just that they know so much that simply ISN*T true!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson