Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Corin Stormhands
Sigh...yes I read that and I don't want to spend another day debating this.

1) Those are recommendations TO the President.

From a commission he formed by executive order. He selected the members. The commssion's goals, and therefore its recommendations, are not likely to too alien from his own thinking.

2) I have yet to have anyone SHOW ME where the document specifically says screening is for EVERYONE and not just at risk populations.

Go look at #907 on this thread, where the commission recommends screening for "all students" in public schools, with parental consent. There are 52 million kids in our public schools, and most are not "at risk."

Speaking of which, where do you find anything in the docs that limits screening to "at risk" individuals?

3) I have yet to see where the President has ACCEPTED these recommendations.

Granted. However, the President's commission report follows the outline he sketched in his announcement of its formation.

Try Googling "mental health parity" "President Bush."

Can you show anywhere that the commission's recommendations contradict anything President Bush has ever said on the subject?

4) I have yet to see where the President OR The White House has said screening for EVERYONE.

So? Have you seen where they've said it's only for those "at risk?"

No, so we need to look further to glean where this proposal might be going. Go look at #907.


963 posted on 06/23/2004 8:50:54 AM PDT by Sabertooth (Mohammedanism is an evil empire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 956 | View Replies ]


To: Sabertooth

Believe what you have need to. But please don't ping me again.

Thank you.


964 posted on 06/23/2004 8:54:29 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 963 | View Replies ]

To: Sabertooth

But before I go and you (or others) accuse me of running or conceding, the White House site report specifally addresses persons with disabilities. I don't know if the term "at risk" is used, but people with disabilities is.

I could be wrong. I hope I'm not. But I just don't see what BMJ and WND are saying.

That's all, and I'm done here.


965 posted on 06/23/2004 8:58:02 AM PDT by Corin Stormhands (Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 963 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson