Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DRY-DRUNK PRESIDENT LOSING HIS GRIP? (barf alert)
Niagara Falls Reporter ^ | 6/22/2004 | Bill Gallagher

Posted on 06/21/2004 1:26:16 PM PDT by Born Conservative

DETROIT -- The lies, delusions and deceptions of George W. Bush have reached a point where the "dry drunk" madness and the "stinking thinking" in his frighteningly flawed mind are what drives all his remarks on the bogus al-Qaida-Iraq connection and the president's rigid, judgmental world view.

In the best of times, George W. can be impatient, self-important and prone to irrational, contorted rationalization. Now that his crazy, unnecessary war in Iraq and grandiose plans to change the Middle East with more violence have clearly failed and he fears that he might get bounced from the White House like his daddy, our president's mental pathology is gaining more control over his behavior.

The commission investigating the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks set off the president's panic attack. The commission -- which Bush first opposed and then ostensibly supported, while his minions thwarted its work -- arrived at a conclusion that sent the White House into white heat.

In vividly clear language, the commission reported, "We have no credible evidence that Iraq and al-Qaida cooperated on attacks against the United States." That fact is well known to anyone who takes time to pursue the truth and is not blinded by partisan fanaticism.

Even Bush said as much himself in one of the most under-reported stories of our times. Last Sept. 17, the president admitted publicly for the first time that there was "no evidence Hussein was involved" with the Sept. 11 attacks.

The admission got little play in the media. The Wall Street Journal and New York Post didn't even bother to mention it, and many other papers buried it far away from the front page.

But the commission rekindled the issue. Since the panel did exhaustive research and its chairman and half of its members were named by the president, the panel's refutation of the Saddam-al-Qaida connection enraged Bush, and the emperor struck back.

"The reason I keep insisting that there was a relationship between Iraq and Saddam and al-Qaida is because there was a relationship between Iraq and al-Qaida," Bush told reporters at the White House after the commission's findings were announced.

Bush said his most significant evidence of this link is Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, a Jordanian terrorist the president claimed worked with the Iraqi government as a "senior al-Qaida terrorist planner." He failed to mention that then-CIA Director George Tenet testified before the Senate that Zarqawi is a rogue operative who doesn't work with al-Qaida and was not associated with the Saddam regime.

I noticed Bush had that same look on his face, that same smirk, defiance and "How dare you question me?" pose when he met last year with Polish reporters, who asked him about the phantom weapons of mass destruction. Bush snapped impatiently, "We have found the weapons of mass destruction." Bush then went on to cite some mobile trailers his own inspectors had already dismissed as harmless weather labs.

Bush then went on a twisted attempt to redefine the record he and his people had deliberately clouded -- aided, I should add, by most of the mainstream media. Wait a minute, Bush cautioned, saying, "This administration never said that the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated between Saddam and al-Qaida."

While that is technically correct, Bush chose to ignore the torrent of rhetoric he and his supporting cast of warmongers used to create just that impression. The administration convinced 70 percent of the American people before the war that Saddam Hussein was linked to Sept. 11 and now Bush is trying to distance himself from the lies and successful propaganda campaign he orchestrated.

Bush said flat-out, one year after bin Laden's terrorists attacked, "You can't distinguish between al-Qaida and Saddam when you talk about the war on terror."

Condoleezza Rice tossed in her contribution to the company line, saying, "Saddam was a danger in the region where the 9/11 threat emerged."

And, of course, there was Donald's Rumsfeld's wild, unfounded claim that "within a week, or a month, Saddam could give his WMD to al-Qaida."

Bush likes his enemies evil and simple. Since Saddam was a personal irritant for Bush and sat on the world's second-largest oil reserves, he was going to be the target no matter what.

Unwilling to admit the real reasons for war and with his phony ones now exposed, the president is growing more angry and resentful. In public he can still put on a cheery and likable face -- as he did when unveiling the Clintons' official portraits at the White House -- but privately there is another picture.

Bush has been displaying "increasingly erratic behavior and mood swings," reports Capitol Hill Blue, an Internet news site. Doug Thompson and Teresa Hampton, who once wrote a scathing piece about Bill Clinton's serial groping and sexual attacks on women, have written a chilling account that raises serious concerns about Bush's state of mind these days.

"It reminds me of the Nixon days," one longtime GOP political consultant with White House links told the reporters. "Everybody is an enemy; everybody is out to get him. That's the mood over there."

White House aides told Thompson and Hampton that Bush is now micromanaging to the extreme, spending hours reviewing attack ads against John Kerry and denouncing Democrats he calls "enemies of the state."

The report notes Secretary of State Colin Powell has fallen from grace because of his doubts about the war against Iraq. One White House aide reveals, "We lost focus. The president got hung up on the weapons of mass destruction and an unproven link to al-Qaida. We could have found other justifiable reasons for the war, but the president insisted on those two tenuous items."

But George W. Bush is an unyielding, inflexible and extreme man, who, by his own admission, follows the dictates of his "gut" rather than careful thought and reflection. Bush may be showing more signs of being a "dry drunk," according to Katherine van Wormer, co-author of "Addiction Treatment: A Strengths Perspective." In an article in "Counterpunch" magazine, she writes, "Dry drunk is a slang term used by members and supporters of Alcoholics Anonymous and substance abuse counselors to describe the recovering alcoholic who is no longer drinking, one who is dry, but whose thinking is clouded. Such an individual is said to be dry but not truly sober. Such an individual tends to go to extremes."

She also observes that Bush's obsessions, tunnel vision, single-mindedness and grandiosity point to the "stinking thinking" commonly found in dry drunks. Bush will claim forever that Saddam was in cahoots with al-Qaida, that there were weapons of mass destruction, and that his war with Iraq is all about doing God's work and spreading freedom. That's how his damaged mind is programmed.

Dick Cheney is another case. He sets his own course and says what he pleases. The vice president -- or enabler in chief -- has nurtured Bush's obsessions. Cheney is the most strident propagator of the al-Qaida-Iraq-link lie and is sticking with his story in a futile attempt to save his fallen reputation and in the hope that continuing the deception for five more months will salvage the Bush administration's chances for another term in office. His clinging to power and his addiction to his discredited reasons for war drive Cheney.

Two days before the 9/11 Commission debunked the al-Qaida-Iraq connection, Cheney, who surely was tipped off, made a pre-emptive strike, claiming Saddam Hussein "had long established ties with al-Qaida."

Cheney was so enraged with media reports about the commission's findings, he ventured from his usual protected forum, the Rush Limbaugh show, to CNBC, territory where he might even be asked a question.

Asked if Iraq was involved in the Sept. 11 attacks, Cheney said, in his oh-so-solemn tones, "We don't know." And then, with a smugness that goes with power addiction, Cheney was asked if he knows information the 9/11 Commission does not know. He crowed, "Probably."

Well, if he does, why didn't he share it with the commission? Why doesn't he tell the American people about the previously unknown smoking gun on the al-Qaida-Iraq connection? Will Cheney provide new evidence? Probably not.

With the power-drunk Cheney navigating and the dry-drunk Bush at the helm, our ship of state is in distress. We should throw them both overboard.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Gallagher, a Peabody Award winner, is a former Niagara Falls city councilman who now covers Detroit for Fox2 News. His e-mail address is gallaghernewsman@aol.com.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: cokeaddict; crackwhore; highasakite; litemydoobie; lsdismyfriend; methaddict; passthebong; tookthebrownacid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

1 posted on 06/21/2004 1:26:17 PM PDT by Born Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

This kind of trash shouldn't be wasting bandwidth.


2 posted on 06/21/2004 1:28:00 PM PDT by nuconvert ("America will never be intimidated by thugs and assassins." ( Azadi baraye Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

I can feel the love.

Z


3 posted on 06/21/2004 1:28:26 PM PDT by familyofman (out of the night when the full moon is bright comes a horseman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Bill Gallagher, a Peabody Award winner,


wow am I impressed


4 posted on 06/21/2004 1:28:48 PM PDT by woofie ( 99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

My! Someone was potty trained too early.


5 posted on 06/21/2004 1:29:30 PM PDT by anonymous_user (Life is like a crap sandwich. The more bread you got, the less crap you gotta eat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

I disagree - I think this should get widest dissimenation as possible! Let people see liberals for what they are.


6 posted on 06/21/2004 1:30:02 PM PDT by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Bill Gallagher is an idiot!


7 posted on 06/21/2004 1:30:14 PM PDT by lonestar (Me, too!--Weinie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

"This kind of trash shouldn't be wasting bandwidth."

I agree. Its garbage.


8 posted on 06/21/2004 1:30:34 PM PDT by Rebelbase ( aka Gassybrowneyedbum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Yawn.


9 posted on 06/21/2004 1:30:42 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (You need tons click "co-ordinating")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alissa

people who believe all of this kind of Moore filth & faulty logic but reason that among the 60+ nations in which AlQaeda has been historically active one of those is not nor never been Iraq.


10 posted on 06/21/2004 1:31:17 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
I think a former drinker who hasn't touched a drop in at least 10 or 15 years probably cannot honestly be called a "dry drunk."
11 posted on 06/21/2004 1:31:52 PM PDT by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
"NIAGRA FALLS!

Slowly I turn . . .

Step by step . . . . .

12 posted on 06/21/2004 1:32:08 PM PDT by BenLurkin (I remember.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Bill must be realated to Mary Kathrine Gallahger.


13 posted on 06/21/2004 1:33:33 PM PDT by lonestar (Me, too!--Weinie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
This kind of trash shouldn't be wasting bandwidth.

One of the reasons FR was founded was so that the daily lies spewing from the leftist press could be refuted and corrected.

How is that mission accomplished without the posting of innaccurate leftist articles?

14 posted on 06/21/2004 1:33:46 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

HAHAHAHA! I'd trust my gut over any pseudo-intellectual liberal elitist who hasn't got an once of common sense.


15 posted on 06/21/2004 1:33:48 PM PDT by rintense (Screw justice. I want revenge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Niagara Falls is a $H!TH@LE nowadays, and this 'newspaper' is circulated only so people have something to wrap their fish in.

Niagara Falls has a NAME from the past only- the Canadian side is bustling with buisness and beauty and commerce- the US side has a thruway and toll booth running in front of the falls, and the town itself is a ghetto.

Property values are the lowest in the country, and 50% less than nearby buffalo, and yet even Buffalo people won't move to NF


16 posted on 06/21/2004 1:34:20 PM PDT by Mr. K (ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,this is like liberal logic,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
Wait a minute, Bush cautioned, saying, "This administration never said that the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated between Saddam and al-Qaida."

While that is technically correct...

Of course, this statement invalidates the entire rabid gushing of this terminal hysteric, but it doesn't stop it.

17 posted on 06/21/2004 1:35:07 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

I suggest Mr. Gallagher take a trip to Iraq himself to inquire of Al-Qaida whether they had any connection with Saddam. I'm sure these AQ guys are not on nearly the power trip President Bush is on. They certainly ain't no "dry drunks." Go aHEAD, Mr. Gallagher. Take a trip.


18 posted on 06/21/2004 1:35:31 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

I wonder who Bill Gallagher will be voting for in the upcoming election.


19 posted on 06/21/2004 1:35:31 PM PDT by spodefly (This post meets the minimum daily requirements for cynicism and irony.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

I hope this is an Op Ed. I sure don't like wiping my backside with the front page, the ink rubs off something fierce.


20 posted on 06/21/2004 1:36:10 PM PDT by IamConservative (A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson