Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FDA seeks to drop CFC propellants from albuterol inhalers
www.packexpo.com ^ | 6/21/04 | FDA

Posted on 06/21/2004 8:52:49 AM PDT by NotQuiteCricket

FDA seeks to drop CFC propellants from albuterol inhalers

With two non-chlorofluorocarbon (non-CFC)-based albuterol metered dose inhalers (MDIs) now on the market for treatment of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, US Food & Drug Administration, Washington, DC, proposes removing “essential-use” status of CFC propellant for this application (Docket No. 2003P-0029). If agency finalizes proposed rule, Use of Ozone-Depleting Substances; Removal of Essential-Use Designations, marketing of albuterol MDIs using CFC propellant would cease at end of transition period. Scientists associate CFCs with depletion of earth’s protective ozone layer. Most aerosols dropped use of CFC propellants more than 25 years ago. Under terms of Montreal Protocol, US ended production, importation of CFCs in 1996 for commercial applications like air conditioning refrigerant. Agency requests comments by 16 August 2004 on potential public health impact, availability of equivalent products, effective date of rule, length of transition period for phase-out. Submit comments including agency name, Docket No. 2003P-0029 to Federal eRulemaking Portal, www.regulations.gov, or agency website, www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments, by email to fdadockets@oc.fda.gov (with Docket No. 2003P-0029 in subject line), by mail/courier Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.Follow-up: Wayne Mitchell, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, +1 301-594-2041, Link: www.fda.gov.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: environment; environmentalism; health
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
I like packexpo.com - this is a nifty site. I think I recall some people on FR having asthma and not liking the new propellent. Just an update on CFC getting the boot all together.
1 posted on 06/21/2004 8:52:52 AM PDT by NotQuiteCricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NotQuiteCricket

Time to stock up.


2 posted on 06/21/2004 9:01:27 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush

See - I thought there were some FReepers who would be interested. Any idea on who else would want to know about this?


3 posted on 06/21/2004 9:05:43 AM PDT by NotQuiteCricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
feon propellants are irreplaceable. Dry powder inhalers invariably increase the amount of drug deposited in the back of the throat. This is bad as the incidence of thrush from corticosteriod inhalers bumps up dramatically.

And I hafta question the basis of all this - that freons reduce ozone. Buncha hooey.

I bet I'll be able to buy freon propellant inhalers from Spain for another 10 years.

4 posted on 06/21/2004 9:07:56 AM PDT by corkoman (Logged in - have you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NotQuiteCricket

Use butane like hairspray. Non-smokers only, of course.


5 posted on 06/21/2004 9:09:46 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NotQuiteCricket

Not really. I don't think anyone has an asthma ping list.

But I definately appreciate the info.


6 posted on 06/21/2004 9:13:47 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NotQuiteCricket

This is pretty stupid, if you ask me. The CFC's, such as they are, are inhaled along with the medication.

How in heck do they "endanger" the environment??? Give me a flippin' break.

They better not screw with the effectiveness of these inhalers!


7 posted on 06/21/2004 9:18:31 AM PDT by Darnright (Thanks, Mr Reagan, we'll never forget you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NotQuiteCricket

I wonder if this is just a cute way to remove the availability of generic albuterol. Everyone will have to get Ventolin or Proventil again.


8 posted on 06/21/2004 9:21:11 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NotQuiteCricket
With two non-chlorofluorocarbon (non-CFC)-based albuterol metered dose inhalers (MDIs) now on the market for treatment of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, US Food & Drug Administration, Washington, DC, proposes removing “essential-use” status of CFC propellant for this application (Docket No. 2003P-0029). If agency finalizes proposed rule, Use of Ozone-Depleting Substances; Removal of Essential-Use Designations, marketing of albuterol MDIs using CFC propellant would cease at end of transition period.

To whom is the FDA making this proposal? To itself?

Is this how this type of thing is supposed to be done?

Why is the Food and Drug Administration asking itself to change a regulation based on environmental concerns?

From a bureaucratice standpoint, this would make more sense to me (debatable ozone-CFC links aside) if the EPA was asking the FDA to change the "essential use" status. However, it appears that the FDA is generating the review on its own, based on a concern that falls outside that agency's purview.


9 posted on 06/21/2004 9:25:12 AM PDT by Sabertooth (Mohammedanism is an evil empire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NotQuiteCricket
Thank you, I am interested. Mr. Flee uses Albuterol Inhaler for a quick fix. Combivent he uses every 4 hours round the clock. He uses Advair once a day and hates it.

More crap to deal with.

10 posted on 06/21/2004 9:38:52 AM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Darnright
The CFC's, such as they are, are inhaled along with the medication.

How in heck do they "endanger" the environment?

The CFS's are inert and not absorbed by the blood vessles in the lungs. The CFC's escape into the atmosphere when the person using the inhaler exhales.

11 posted on 06/21/2004 10:25:00 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NotQuiteCricket

Thank you for posting this information on inhalers. The new inhalers that are being pushed on the market do not work like the older ones. It takes one half hour for the new Ventolin albuterol inhaler to work--I could be in tough shape by then. I had to stop using Serevent Diskus because most of the powder stayed in my mouth. That is not good and I did not need a medical doctor to understand the danger to my body. If it is in my mouth, it travels through the whole body. The reason we use inhalents is for the product to go right to the source. How does the gas used to propel the inhalers move into the environment if it all is inhaled into our bodies? I would like an answer to that question from the FDA. Thank you for revealing a health problem that will result in death or huge injuries to the lungs.


12 posted on 06/21/2004 10:36:07 AM PDT by Scandi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

That was the first thing that came to my mind.


13 posted on 06/21/2004 10:53:35 AM PDT by TheBattman (Leadership = http://www.georgewbush.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: A.J.Armitage; ArmstedFragg; ArrogantBustard; bk1000; Born Conservative; brianl703; BudgieRamone; ...

Ping.

You posted to this thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/997840/posts?q=1&&page=101

Which brought a lot of people out who had asthma, or knew someone who did. I'm pinging you to an article about the FDA moving to remove CFC as a propellant.


14 posted on 06/21/2004 11:19:46 AM PDT by NotQuiteCricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NotQuiteCricket

Interesting. Thanks for the info.


15 posted on 06/21/2004 11:26:02 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NotQuiteCricket
Thanks for the ping.
I use an albuterol inhaler occasionally and this is the first I've heard of this.
16 posted on 06/21/2004 11:27:41 AM PDT by Constitution Day (Burger-Eating War Monkey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NotQuiteCricket

Thanks for the ping. This is good to know. I use a CFC based Albuterol inhaler. What are the two inhalers that don't use them?


17 posted on 06/21/2004 11:47:45 AM PDT by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kenth
What are the two inhalers that don't use them[CFCs]?

I'm sorry, but I don't know.

18 posted on 06/21/2004 12:10:36 PM PDT by NotQuiteCricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kenth
What are the two inhalers that don't use them[CFCs]?

I'm sorry, but I don't know.

19 posted on 06/21/2004 12:10:36 PM PDT by NotQuiteCricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts

That's what I'm wondering.

The proposed change is open to comments from the public: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/oc/dockets/comments/COMMENTSMain.CFM?EC_DOCUMENT_ID=412&SUBTYP=CONTINUE&CID=&AGENCY=FDA


20 posted on 06/21/2004 12:24:08 PM PDT by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson