Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stanford Achievement Test
vanity | June 21, 2004 | Jim Noble

Posted on 06/21/2004 6:10:18 AM PDT by Jim Noble

On of my daughters is in first grade at a local Christian school. She just took her first standardized test, the Stanford Achievement Test.

She scored fifth, sixth, and seventh-grade equivalent in all subjects (except one), and was at or above the 99%ile in all subjects (except one).

That one is called "environment", and she was below average for grade.

"Environment" has sub-categories, two of which are "political science" and "economics", in which she did especially poorly.

Now, she is actually pretty knowledgeable for a seven year old about both politics and economics (except that she is more of a Bushbot than her Dad).

What kind of polysci and econ questions are on the Stanford Achievement Test? Is the test biased against VRWC daughters?

I don't actually care (I already know she's smart, and I already know the school does a good job), but if these national tests have a political scoring bias, I'd like to know.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: education; testing

1 posted on 06/21/2004 6:10:18 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

We're going to have to work really hard to dumb down this Noble girl. Designate her as ADD/ADHD. /NEA bureaucrat


2 posted on 06/21/2004 6:15:05 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Yes, the test questions are very biased.


3 posted on 06/21/2004 6:21:41 AM PDT by kiki04 ("If a little knowledge is dangerous, where is a man who has so much as to be out of danger?" - THH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Stanford Achievement results

Christian School Standford Achievement results

The score in the so called 'Environment' portion of the test seems pretty biased towards those better 'brainwashed' by the 'new values' of public education...in the long term those in private schools will fare better... as 'real world' job market seems to favor those whose early competency in reading writing and arithmatic leads to greater competency for life...

I doubt the 'environment' portion of the tests reveal much other than who watches more TV than the others

imo

4 posted on 06/21/2004 6:25:18 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
Thanks for the fast answer.

Nothing like a little FReasearch to start the week!

5 posted on 06/21/2004 6:28:26 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Now you go feed those hogs before they worry themselves into anemia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Just never make the mistake of assuming that your "good school" will always STAY a good school. If you don't remain heavily involved in what the teacher is teaching, your child may learn a whole set of worldviews unbeknownst to you.

Also, now that you KNOW your child is exceedingly bright, there is a GOOD chance that she will lose attention to mundane teaching regarding topics she already has knowledge of. This can lead to the school suspecting that she is an ADD case.

My oldest sounds exactly like yours (intelligence-level at that age), and went through something similar. I had to move him to a private school for two years, and even they couldn't keep him interested.

We ended up homeschooling, and he has been doing college-level biology, calculus/advanced mathematics, and writing novels (only 15). And to think that they wanted to put him on drugs. Hmmph.

6 posted on 06/21/2004 6:38:42 AM PDT by ImaGraftedBranch (Liberals are evidence that Satan is very active in this world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ImaGraftedBranch

Good for you! Oh how I wish homeschooling was legal when my youngest son was school age. His schooling was a nightmare. He is near genius and the schools simply didn't know what to do with him. I taught him all he knows, but we had to suffer through all the labeling and other idiotic "teaching" methods for 12 years. He turned out alright in spite of them.


7 posted on 06/21/2004 7:36:06 AM PDT by WVNan (Be faithful in little things, for in them our strength lies. (Mother Teresa))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Zip

ping


8 posted on 06/21/2004 8:08:07 AM PDT by zip (Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough became truth to 42% of americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
The Stanford is a decent test BUT, yes it is biased. The environmental portion is designed to be correctly answered according to the PC (ALGORE) definitions only.
9 posted on 06/21/2004 4:26:41 PM PDT by zip (Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough became truth to 42% of americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson