Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobbyS

Right, and a scholar and lawyer I know, who is Jewish, but studied in Catholic Universities, credits the Spanish Inquisition, and not Old Testament Law with the lack of modern Jewish evangelism. Second, the Church of Rome has, historically, discouraged Catholics from owning Bibles and printed or wrote those Bibles in a language the populace (those who could read in their own language) couldn't understand. This effectively made church officials the exclusive source of religious information. Can't we say that the Roman Catholic Church has come along way, and stop saying the the Church is wholly immutable?


25 posted on 06/18/2004 10:26:44 AM PDT by NYFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: NYFriend
This effectively made church officials the exclusive source of religious information.

That was the point that I was trying to express.

We see that same thing happening today, with today's liberal controlled media. How dare Fox News Network and the Internet question what they are telling the people!

By the way, I honor and respect today's Catholic Church. In many ways, we share similar beliefs and I have always enjoyed spending a Sunday with them.

31 posted on 06/18/2004 10:33:39 AM PDT by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: NYFriend
Second, the Church of Rome has, historically, discouraged Catholics from owning Bibles

The only time or place where this has happened was in southern France in the 13th Century, where there was an active and anti-Christian heresy called Albigensianism. The Albigenses read a corrupted version of the Bible in the local language. The prohibition was local, not universal, and lasted for about 50 years.

and printed or wrote those Bibles in a language the populace (those who could read in their own language) couldn't understand.

First off, prior to the 19th Century, anyone who was educated at all was educated in Latin, so that wasn't a language the educated populace "couldn't understand".

And both John Foxe and the foreword to the 1611 KJV admit that there were numerous translations of the Bible into English before the English Reformation. Other European languages were similar.

32 posted on 06/18/2004 10:35:10 AM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: NYFriend
Second, the Church of Rome has, historically, discouraged Catholics from owning Bibles and printed or wrote those Bibles in a language the populace (those who could read in their own language) couldn't understand.

Nonsense. Just what percentage of the population of Europe do you think was even literate in those days, anyway? Not many. And generally, if you were literate, you were literate in Latin.
240 posted on 06/19/2004 3:15:31 PM PDT by Antoninus (Federal Marriage Amendment, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson