Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putin: Russia Gave Bush Info on Terrorism (Putin warned Bush of Iraq terror plot against U.S.)
AP / Las Vegas Sun ^ | 06/18/2004 | AP, by Staff

Posted on 06/18/2004 5:22:58 AM PDT by anita

Edited on 06/18/2004 5:30:38 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

ASTANA, Kazakhstan (AP) - Russia gave the Bush administration intelligence that suggested Saddam Hussein's regime was preparing attacks against the United States and its interests abroad before the Iraq war, President Vladimir Putin said Friday.

Putin said he couldn't comment on how critical the Russians' information was in U.S. decision to invade Iraq. However, he said the intelligence didn't cause Russia to waver from its firm opposition to the war.

"Indeed, after Sept. 11, 2001, and before the start of the military operation in Iraq, the Russian special services ... received information that officials from Saddam's regime were preparing terrorist attacks in the United States and outside it against the U.S. military and other interests," Putin said.

"Despite that information about terrorist attacks being prepared by Saddam's regime, Russia's position on Iraq remains unchanged," Putin said.

Putin said Russia didn't have any information that Saddam's regime had actually been behind any terrorist acts.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq; putin; russia; saddam; terrorism; warnings; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-180 next last
To: OXENinFLA

New York Slimes, SmellA Times, Washington DNC Post

141 posted on 06/18/2004 9:50:00 AM PDT by BJungNan (Stop Spam - Start Charging for Email - You get 2000 a month for free, then you pay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: anita

Maybe Pooty-Poot has enough Communists to deal with in his own country, and doesn't want to deal with another one in the White House. Whatever, once again, we get a sign that the Cold War is really, really over. Thanks Vlad.


142 posted on 06/18/2004 9:50:08 AM PDT by HolgerDansk (Vikings: The Original Amphibious Warriors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jriemer

It's ironic that we now get a closer approximation to the truth from Russia, than we do from our own US media!


143 posted on 06/18/2004 9:58:54 AM PDT by JPJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Colorado Doug
Yes, it confirms we do have information on Putin in the Oil for Food scandal...

WHAMMO! Dontcha love it when a plan comes together.

144 posted on 06/18/2004 9:59:47 AM PDT by numberonepal (John Kerry has missed 2/3 of his Senate votes since starting his campaign.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TexKat

Can anyone here reason why Bush didn't mention this earlier?


145 posted on 06/18/2004 10:03:05 AM PDT by M. Peach (eschew obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: anita

ABC "News" isn't even reporting this on their website. All they have is anti-American propaganda. Who the hell's running the show over there?


146 posted on 06/18/2004 10:03:44 AM PDT by oldleft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

So let's see. Al Qaeda was in Iran, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Spain, England, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Africa, Jordan and just about every country on the planet.

But there IS NO WAY that Al Qaeda was in Iraq. Nope.


147 posted on 06/18/2004 10:05:58 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: JeepInMazar
If true, it was because Russia, as France, stood to lose $$ Billions $$ when Saddam's Food-for-Oil/ "No-War"-for-Oil scam was cleaned up by the US Army.
-or-
Perhaps he was saying that he fed us "bad intel" to deliberately "set us up"?

My $$$'s on the prior.....

148 posted on 06/18/2004 10:06:25 AM PDT by TeleStraightShooter (Kerry{D-Hanoi} will graff post-Vietnam policy on Iraq: Exit & let the Syrian Baathists take over)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: anita

Well, well, New York Times and the other demoncRATS, We the People are waiting for a retraction. Here's some crow? Bon Appetit!


149 posted on 06/18/2004 10:12:42 AM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeepInMazar

"Putin: We knew Saddam Hussian was promoting acts of terrorism against America and we were opposed to America defending against these acts of terrorism."

Good point. I can't think of how anyone could spin it differently. What's even more interesting, is why Bush didn't mention this before? Why doesn't Bush schedule a press conference during prime time to denounce the lies from the liberal press?

How can he let this slide? He may lose because of his reluctance to go all out against the smears against him.


150 posted on 06/18/2004 10:13:55 AM PDT by M. Peach (eschew obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: M. Peach
Can anyone here reason why Bush didn't mention this earlier?

Bush still hasn't "mentioned" it. Why do you think he should have earlier?

This is coming from Putin directly.

151 posted on 06/18/2004 10:15:59 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: M. Peach

Haven't been listening to Bush, hm?

Reluctance to go against smears?

HA!

I laugh at such an absurd notion.


152 posted on 06/18/2004 10:17:37 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: M. Peach; JeepInMazar

And as to the fretting over Putin having information yet not being for us acting on it, so fricking what? Since when do we bow to Putin's advice on when, how and where we should act?

The point of the story is the information itself, period.

Bush never claimed it or used it publicly to buttress his rationale for war, but it DOES put the lie to the idea that Saddam didn't pose a threat outside of his own little corner of the world.


153 posted on 06/18/2004 10:19:45 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

"Bush still hasn't "mentioned" it. Why do you think he should have earlier?"

Because it has more than 2 and a half years of attacks from the presstitutes that we had no reason to be in Iraq. Had he made this immediatley known, it would have stemmed the attacks against him.


154 posted on 06/18/2004 10:21:10 AM PDT by M. Peach (eschew obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
And as to the fretting over Putin having information yet not being for us acting on it, so fricking what? Since when do we bow to Putin's advice on when, how and where we should act? The point of the story is the information itself, period. Bush never claimed it or used it publicly to buttress his rationale for war, but it DOES put the lie to the idea that Saddam didn't pose a threat outside of his own little corner of the world.

Exactamundo!
155 posted on 06/18/2004 10:22:33 AM PDT by gipper81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

I am so pissed by the blatant lies of the liberal press - that Bush needs to go all out against them or they just might get Kerry elected. That would be the worst thing that could happen to us.

I think he should schedule a national press conference on prime time to denounce the blatant lies, using obvious examples - and reiterate why we are there.


156 posted on 06/18/2004 10:23:57 AM PDT by M. Peach (eschew obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: M. Peach
Can anyone here reason why Bush didn't mention this earlier?

Timing.

157 posted on 06/18/2004 10:24:24 AM PDT by numberonepal (John Kerry has missed 2/3 of his Senate votes since starting his campaign.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: M. Peach
Because it has more than 2 and a half years of attacks from the presstitutes that we had no reason to be in Iraq. Had he made this immediatley known, it would have stemmed the attacks against him.

The Attack Machine was loaded and ready regardless. This Putin info was only one small part of the equation.
158 posted on 06/18/2004 10:24:31 AM PDT by gipper81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal

OK - good point - I'll buy that - but I still think that he would have been better off silencing them earlier before the lies got traction.


159 posted on 06/18/2004 10:26:17 AM PDT by M. Peach (eschew obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: M. Peach
Please see the interview Dick Cheney gave yesterday. I think you will be pleased.

Since Tuesday, President Bush has been extremely forceful re the Iraq/Al Qaeda connection. Tuesday he gave a press conference with Karzai, Wednesday a worldwide address to the troops, and today his speech at Ft. Lewis was terrific.

But here's the Cheney interview. He was kicking rear and taking names:

CHENEY: CLEAR LINKS BETWEEN SADDAM, AL-QAEDA; CALLS NY TIMES ARTICLE 'OUTRAGEOUS'

strategery....

160 posted on 06/18/2004 10:28:39 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-180 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson