Posted on 06/17/2004 9:41:40 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
|
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaresearch.org ...
Dittos! The damage by the elite NY press has been done.
It matters not what Bush says or does, it never has.
It matters not what the Kerry/UN/Soros ticket says or does, nor did it matter what Clinton or Gore said or did, the enemy has never been the Dems, but the elites in NY media and Hollywood.
They have been in charge of our culture and politics for 40 years.
Public officials are afraid of them, as are CEO's, sports figures, and anyone who does not follow their "speech codes".
They smear at will, they destroy reputations, and lifetimes of work of individuals, they decide who gets awards, recognitions, and notice. They mock our history, religion, and family life.
They write our history books, and have taken over all institutions of learning and our judiciary.
They are a menace, and must be discredited and distroyed.
Rush and the internet are NOT our saviors.
This has been my constant rant for the last 10 years.
Check it out .. even NPR did a report on their station and mentioned the connect with iran and Iraq
It will take a few seconds to load up .. but scroll down to where it says
Please ping Backhoe, peach and race bannon so that they can include this in their indexes.
Great Work.
al Querry is sorry that al Ghorroid invented the internet!
The internet, Free Republic and Freepers will be the end of the power of left wing mediots. Their days of lying, spinning, revision of history and spiking news like this are over.
Sure thing
Hey Y'all ... just a little info for your files on this thread
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,314700,00.html
Saddam link to Bin Laden
Terror chief 'offered asylum' in Iraq? US says dealings step up danger of chemical weapons attacks
By Julian Borger in Washington
Saturday February 6, 1999
The Guardian
Saddam Hussein's regime has opened talks with Osama bin Laden, bringing closer the threat of a terrorist attack using chemical, biological or nuclear weapons, according to US intelligence sources and Iraqi opposition officials.
The key meeting took place in the Afghan mountains near Kandahar in late December. The Iraqi delegation was led by Farouk Hijazi, Baghdad's ambassador in Turkey and one of Saddam's most powerful secret policemen, who is thought to have offered Bin Laden asylum in Iraq.
The Saudi-born fundamentalist's response is unknown. He is thought to have rejected earlier Iraqi advances, disapproving of the Saddam Hussein's secular Baathist regime. But analysts believe that Bin Laden's bolthole in Afghanistan, where he has lived for the past three years, is now in doubt as a result of increasing US and Saudi government pressure.
News of the negotiations emerged in a week when the US attorney general, Janet Reno, warned the Senate that a terrorist attack involving weapons of mass destruction was a growing concern. "There's a threat, and it's real," Ms Reno said, adding that such weapons "are being considered for use."
US embassies around the world are on heightened alert as a result of threats believed to emanate from followers of Bin Laden, who has been indicted by a US court for orchestrating the bombing last August of embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, in which 259 people died. US delegations in Africa and the Gulf have been shut down in recent weeks after credible threats were received.
In this year's budget, President Clinton called for an additional $2 billion to spend on counter-terrorist measures, including extra guards for US embassies around the world and funds for executive jets to fly rapid response investigative teams to terrorist incidents around the world.
Since RAF bombers took part in air raids on Iraq in December, Bin Laden declared that he considered British citizens to be justifiable targets. Vincent Cannistraro, former chief of CIA counter-terrorist operations, said: "Hijazi went to Afghanistan in December and met with Osama, with the knowledge of the Taliban leader, Mullah Omar. We are sure about that. What is the source of some speculation is what transpired."
An acting US counter-intelligence official confirmed the report. "Our understanding over what happened matches your account, but there's no one here who is going to comment on it."
Ahmed Allawi, a senior member of the opposition Iraqi National Congress (INC), based in London, said he had heard reports of the December meeting which he believed to be accurate. "There is a long history of contacts between Mukhabarat [Iraqi secret service] and Osama bin Laden," he said. Mr Hijazi, formerly director of external operations for Iraqi intelligence, was "the perfect man to send to Afghanistan".
Analysts believe that Mr Hijazi offered Mr bin Laden asylum in Iraq, most likely in return for co-operation in launching attacks on US and Saudi targets. Iraqi agents are believed to have made a similar offer to the Saudi maverick leader in the early 1990s when he was based in Sudan.
Although he rejected the offer then, Mamoun Fandy, a professor of Middle East politics at Georgetown University, said Bin Laden's position in Afghanistan is no longer secure after the Saudi monarchy cut off diplomatic relations with, and funding for, the Taleban militia movement, which controls most of the country.
Mr Fandy said senior members of the Saudi royal family told him in recent weeks that they had received assurances from the Taleban leader, Mullah Mohamed Omar, that once the radical Islamist movement secured control over Afghan territory, Bin Laden would be forced to leave. "It's a matter of time now for Osama." He said Bin Laden would have a strong ideological aversion to accepting Iraqi hospitality, but might have little choice.
Thanks!! It was posted in #36 above... FReepers are amazing, I tell you!
Jamie Gorelick is a lightweight and has really stepped in it this time.
"Certainly there's a connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda," he said in 2002. "It doesn't surprise me at all that they would be talking to Al Qaeda, that there would be some Al Qaeda there or that Saddam Hussein might even be, you know, discussing gee, I wonder since I don't have any scuds and since the Americans are coming at me, I wonder if I could take advantage of Al Qaeda? How would I do it? Is it worth the risk? What could they do for me?"
I guess the NYT posted that example of a Dem "flip-flopping" so they could keep up the work for their pick for pres: the ultimate waffle John f'n Kerry ;)
Just another example of what happens when a Dem doesn't want for something, and doesn't have to think before they talk.
LOLOL! It was quite late and I was tired.
Volley bump and hug!
Not having any luck with that one.
Realplayer said he needed new software so he automagically downloaded that but the link to the NPR file timed out.
Hmmm?
That reference nails it!
Strange document, can't capture it anyway I know about using adobe.
Got to talk to my son who works with adobe documents all the time.
MegaDiTToes!!!
YES!
And all Clinton did was waste some cruise missiles on camels and tents!
GREAT!
OK, I was wearing out too!
Dust off some of those old rants, and add me to your audience. We will set up an awards board and give out prizes for excellence in ranting. pinging some other rantmeisters...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.