Replies

I read it. I agree with most of it. I fail to see what it has to do with the issue at hand.

Are you maintaining that its totally irrelvant to you if all species of animals disappear except for what we can cook?

Do you want to live in a world of concrete and asphalt and planted city parks?

Do you not want your children to have an opportunity to hunt and fish and hike in a wilderness?

Don't you want some vestige of the the America that Washington, the pilgrims, the Indians, etc, saw left for posterity?

The people who live in large cities, for the most part, do NOT think like conservatives, they think like liberals.

They don't like guns, hunting, and feel the government should be the answer to everybody's problems.

Do you wnat more and more of these people perpetuated in America?

Is THEIR lifestyle what you want to leave as a legacy to your children?

Personally, I would be happier living in 17th Century America and the closer we can get to that ideal the better.

17th Century America

Try pre-Columbus. That is the era the environmentalists want returned. They want no technology, no medicine, no advanced agricultre. They want a lot of people to die, their goal is to reduce the world population to about 6 billion people, or fewer in the next 50 or 60 years. Its all there, in the doctrine of sustainable development and the UN document Global Biodiversity Assessment, from 1996. Yep, they say most of the things we take for granted as Americans are unsustainable, including air conditioning/refrigeration, hoofed animals like cows, agriculture, cemetaries,children, single family homes, humans who live in rural areas the list goes on and on. In fact, they want everybody out of the country and into "human settlements", living stacked up sky high with no access to the countryside because, in the words of an environmentalists who recently visited Santa Cruz, they want a world where the animals run free and the people live in cages.

"Personally, I would be happier living in 17th Century America and the closer we can get to that ideal the better."

I agree. I ive as close to that model as is possible. Your arguements and 'questions' however, have nothing to do with this or me. If I had my way, I'd do away with cities...they breed confusion and greed. But that's not going to happen. I hope you will continue to study this issue to see what we're really up against. I will continue to be a true conservationist and love and care for the land and all it's creatures as I always have.