Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach

Peach, you take a snipe at republicans in most of your replies that I have read.

I'm tired of so called republicans acting like the president, his cabinet and our congress people are free fire zones.

You snipe at our president and you will get return fire from those of us protecting him. That "lost his vigor" is another cheap snipe by cheap shot artists who post that bs.


164 posted on 06/17/2004 2:02:15 PM PDT by Grampa Dave ( We wait breathlessly for the al Ghorroid speech at the rat convention for al Querry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]


To: All

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1155402/posts?page=1

Russian source skeptical about 9/11 panel's conclusions
Interfax ^ | June 17 2004


Posted on 06/17/2004 1:29:23 PM PDT by knighthawk


MOSCOW. June 17 (Interfax) - A Russian intelligence source expressed skepticism on Thursday about conclusions drawn by the U.S. commission investigating the September 11 attacks. The source argued that the point that there is "no credible evidence" of any link between the Saddam Hussein regime and al-Qaeda attacks and other conclusions made by the commission failed to draw a comprehensive picture of what Iraq was like two years ago. "Separated from other elements of the Iraqi problem, the conclusions and generalizations that have been made cannot be recognized as objective," the source told Interfax. He said Russian intelligence services possessed no evidence of any links between Saddam and al-Qaeda either. However, he went on, Russian intelligence received a report early in 2002 that Iraqi secret services were organizing terrorist attacks on U.S. territory and against U.S. diplomatic and military facilities outside the United States. "This information was more than once passed on to our American partners in oral and written form in the fall of 2002," the source said. He expressed support for the position Russia took at the start of the U.S.-led war against Iraq but said that, "nevertheless, in investigating the causes of the Iraq crisis, it is necessary to take into account all the aspects, including the direct threat to the U.S. from the Saddam Hussein regime."


165 posted on 06/17/2004 2:03:35 PM PDT by Grampa Dave ( We wait breathlessly for the al Ghorroid speech at the rat convention for al Querry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave

Dave - I think you may be thinking of someone else.

My defense of the president is as strong as anyone's around here.

And if you think Bush hasn't lost some vigor, you haven't been reading the many, many posters who have said the exact same thing for months.

You think it's sniping at the president for not defending himself more vigorously against the smears and lies by the mainstream press. I think it's a defense of the president himself that I'm so upset by the smears and lies.

And you have not responded to the fact that I've now spent nearly 9 hours on FR posting a lengthy list of defense against some of those smears and lies. I'd call that a pretty committed defense of the president.

What have you done to get him re-elected today?


166 posted on 06/17/2004 2:06:43 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave

Snipe at Peach and see what happens to you, Gramps.


167 posted on 06/17/2004 2:08:58 PM PDT by txhurl (~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson