Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Detroit gun dealer shouldn't face charges for alleged "straw buy"
MLive.com ^ | June 16, 2004 | The Associated Press

Posted on 06/16/2004 12:28:58 PM PDT by wmichgrad

LANSING, Mich. (AP) — A gun dealer should not face a misdemeanor charge for selling a firearm to an undercover law enforcement officer who indicated it was for an underage person who didn't have a license, the Michigan Supreme Court said in a decision released Wednesday.

The court ruled that longtime Detroit gun dealer General Laney didn't violate federal or state statutes that allow licensed 18-year-olds to buy or receive a pistol from a private party, but prohibits them from purchasing a gun from a federally licensed gun dealer.

In April 1999, two Wayne County sheriff's deputies — Walter Epps and Roshunda Coming — posed as customers interested in buying a gun for unlicensed 18-year-old civilian Antonio Little, who was working with them. It was intended to be a "straw buy," in which an individual who is legally able to purchase a weapon fills out paperwork on behalf of the individual who can't own one.

The Supreme Court pointed out that the dealer told the undercover deputies that he couldn't sell a gun to an 18-year-old without a license. The dealer also refused to accept payment for a firearm from Little, insisting that it come from one of the undercover deputies although they had indicated it was for Little.

The Supreme Court said there is no dispute that Epps bought the gun because he had a gun license, selected it and handed Laney the money to pay for it.

"Because (the dealer) complied with the plain and unambiguous language of the stature, he committed no crime," the Supreme Court said.

The Supreme Court ruling reverses a decision handed down by the Michigan Court of Appeals, which ruled that decision should be left to a jury.

-

On the Net:

Michigan Court of Appeals: http://courtofappeals.mijud.net/


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; entrapment; gundealer; gunlicesne; guns; police; setup; undercover; weapons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Navy Patriot

LOL!
Umm...


21 posted on 06/16/2004 1:13:02 PM PDT by Darksheare (Can't wait for the day when all my voices are reduced to the space of one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
This guy had little choice, almost any charge that could have been plead to would have resulted in the loss of his FFL. He'd be out of business. Certainly worth going to trial over.

Considering how the BATF likes to kick in the doors of FFL dealers in the middle of the night on the slightest of pretexts, I admire him even more.

22 posted on 06/16/2004 1:22:47 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
I got a gun for Christmas. My mom bought it. I was there and went through the background check since it was for me.

Generally this activity is exempt, as it is specifically a "purchase for gift" and is mentioned in law as exempt. Other factors contributing to evidence of "purchase for gift": close blood relative; both persons legally able to posess firearms; receiving party passed background for this particular gift; no concealment of facts from firearm dealer; Christmas. Pretty much, no cop in his right mind would touch this one. Wise cop would say: Your mom got a gun for YOU? That's a good trade!

23 posted on 06/16/2004 1:25:10 PM PDT by Navy Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

Your right I misread. I was talking about a case where an undercover cop made a straw purchase and on the 4473 form said he was purchasing it for himself. The courts ruled the cop lied on the form and the gunseller wasn't negligent.


24 posted on 06/16/2004 1:55:43 PM PDT by hoosierboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ICX
There is no crime in Detroit as evidenced by the army of cops that surround Kwame wherever he goes.(sarcasm)
25 posted on 06/16/2004 2:23:15 PM PDT by School of Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ICX
Don't Michigan cops have more important things to do than set up bogus sting operations on law-abiding citizens?

There are no gangs of lawyers and victims-rights activists for law-abiding citizens, therefore they are easier prey.

26 posted on 06/16/2004 2:26:29 PM PDT by spodefly (This post meets the minimum daily requirements for cynicism and irony.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
As they weren't even trying to prevent the commission of what they claimed to think was a crime, they aren't Law Enforcement

The French term agent provocateur applies.

27 posted on 06/16/2004 9:11:22 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy ("Despise not the jester. Often he is the only one speaking the truth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson