Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NYC Republican; section9; Nick Danger; Howlin; Perlstein; LS; William McKinley; Sabertooth; Liz; ...
"Do you guys think this will be a big deal, or has the public already heard this ad nauseum, and will not really react? Any thoughts?"

Like any good magician, the liberal press is hoping that you don't see the slight of hand behind the trick.

What the Commission said was that they don't see credible evidence of Al-Qaeda and Iraq cooperating on the 9/11 attacks.

But the slight of hand here is that the *press* is now saying that there is no cooperation between Iraq and Al-Qaeda...at all.

It's clever. This is high quality propaganda. Why, the news media has this Congressional Commission's report! Of course there was no link between Iraq and Al-Qaeda, the press claims!

But that's not what the report said. The report only said "no credible proof of 9/11 cooperation..." not that there was no link between them at all. Al Qaeda leader Abu Nidal was in a Baghdad hospital from before 9/11 until almost the moment of our invasion of Iraq, after all. Al-Ansar operated inside Iraq's northernmost territories, for another. Iraqi agents may have even met with Mohamad Atta in Prague prior to the 9/11 attack, too...and Iraqi Intelligence agent Ramsi Yusef was *convicted* of blowing up the WTC back in 1993.

But that evidence now gets overlooked. The news media now has a Congressional Report, you know.

Subtle. Sneaky.

< Applause >

We might as well applaud such high quality propaganda. That's the way the masters of the craft do it.

Too bad that it's at our expense, though.

73 posted on 06/16/2004 10:04:59 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Southack
Al Qaeda leader Abu Nidal was in a Baghdad hospital from before 9/11 until almost the moment of our invasion of Iraq, after all.

While I agree with the basic thrust of your post, this detail is incorrect. Abu Nidal was a terrorist (Abu Nidal organization (ANO) a.k.a. Fatah Revolutionary Council, Arab Revolutionary Council, Arab Revolutionary Brigades, Black September, and Revolutionary Organization of Socialist Muslims), but not Al Qaeda. That doesn't make his presence in Iraq any less a causus belli, but it's imprtant to keep the players straight.

In fact, it may have been Abu Nidal's unwillingness to assist Al Qaeda that led to his suicide by multiple gunshot wounds.

While in Baghdad, Abu Nidal, whose real name was Sabri al-Banna, came under pressure from Saddam to help train groups of al-Qa'eda fighters who moved to northern Iraq after fleeing Afghanistan. Saddam also wanted Abu Nidal to carry out attacks against the US and its allies.

When Abu Nidal refused, Saddam ordered his intelligence chiefs to assassinate him. He was shot dead last weekend when Iraqi security forces burst into his apartment in central Baghdad.
Saddam killed Abu Nidal over al-Qa'eda row
Telegraph/UK | August 25th, 2002


75 posted on 06/16/2004 11:16:13 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson