Posted on 06/15/2004 8:21:01 AM PDT by Sabertooth
I think that the larger debate is about a small minority of people imposing their will on the majority. We talk about it here all the time with smoking, drinking, perfumes, etc etc etc. Do we insist that the people with an allergy take responsibility for themselves and avoid peanuts or places where they can be found, or do we just ban peanuts from all public places alltogether?
As far as the ballpark is concerned, having peanut free nights just makes good business sense to me. Opens themselves up to a new demographic. Also, it's no different than fireworks night, or 'free ball' night, as far as I'm concerned.
AMEN, and congratulations on taking "personal responsibility". Compared to many, you are to be praised for not taking your daughters allergies out on the rest of the public.
I'm glad they went back to the old recipe. For a few years there they were just onion pretzels, regardless of what the package said. I'd given up on them for a while until a co-worker brought in a bag. It was a sad world when Snyder's couldn't be counted on for good pretzels.
Yes BS. That study says 1% of CHILDREN have it and gives no indication of the severity. Since only about 1/5 of the population is children that means the percentage of the total population (which was my original statement) is going to be approximately .2%, and that's just having the allergy at all. We have nothing to estimate what percentage of them have it severely enough that it's life threatening.
I would recommend breast feeding. I would not recommend feeding any peanut related products to the mother while breast feeding. This is one of the few things they do know about the allergy and how it starts.
They didn't. In years prior, death in childhood due to an idiopathic histamine reaction would have been the most likely outcome. Of course, it's idiopathic no longer.
The problem is, we can find people with bad allergies to just about everything. We can't make the world allergy-free.
Not all allergies are created equal. For one reason or another allergies to proteins, such as peanut allergies tend to be severe and life-threatening, whereas most allergies are merely minor annoyances. Mrs. Melas RN
Whether it comes from the government or from private enterprise has no impact of of ot changes the way I live. And how it changes the way I live is then I have to find out which section is peanut free and either not sit there or not eat peanuts if I happen to want to sit in that location. All so that .1% of the general population, or about 3 people out of a standard 3,000 person minor league game attendance, can feel safe.
I'm not creating a strawman at all. If there's somebody here making a strawman that would be YOU, since the article is talking about peanut-free GAMES not sections.
Considering this is a recent phenomena, I am puzzled that the parents of these fatal peanut kids aren't more interested is how the disease developed. As best I can tell, they are merely content with controlling the behavior of others (present company excluded) rather than studying how the problem happened and whether there is a cure. One of the kids in my sons class suddenly became allergic and the teachers started imspecting backpacks the next day.
I'm not willing to roll the dice with the lives of my kids. If they were fatally allergic to milk, they would be homeschooled. The risks are too great if the exposure is fatal.
And therefore NOT 1% amoung the general polution. So the claim that it's 10,000 out of a million is indeed BS.
Now that is interesting.
Please note I don't doubt that most cases are a real, physical reaction. The more I think of this, the more I'm starting to wonder if there isn't some larger issue here, such as something happening in the last 10-15 years that changes the way peanuts react with the human body. As I said before, there must be some difference.
While keeping those appearing to be allergic to peanuts away from them will stop their reaction to them obviously, I'm concerned that we're missing some larger issue here since, as I explained previously, there's no biological way an allergy to peanuts can suddenly just occur without something changing.
It's my hope that investigation into this relatively new phenomenon is ongoing.
Is this mainly an American phenomenon, or do your statistics reflect worldwide reporting?
The 1.04% was the general population.
You make a very good point.
this article has a TON of typos!
Where have you obtained these numbers, and are they based on American or worldwide populations?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.