I am not sure what the sonar could prove as we have the bodies....unless it is much clearer than I imagine.
from what I understood from some site I was reading is that the sonar not only shows the label on pants but the fact that laci had a very full belly therefor conner could not have been born alive.
I have read the SAME thing fiesti. The sonar takes clear pictures it said, REGARDLESS of the murky underwater conditions. It stated that she was still "full with child"!! AND it identified where she was tethered. Neck, arms, something about being cinched around the middle and then I don't think it mentioned the lower extremities. I was absolutely FURIOUS after listening to LKL tonight. I'm really sick of Pixley and Cardoza makes my blood boil. "If that's all the Prosecution has blah blah blah". How do THEY know EXACTLY what the Prosecution has????
If in fact the sonar does show Laci with a full belly then there goes Gerapalopes defense saying that Conner was full term and born alive.
I wonder if in fact they do have a sonar picture showing this because it was stated that the prosecutors had to turn over all evidence to the defense right away. If that is the case then I wouldn't think Gerapalope would be out there saying Conner was born alive and full term.
What?? The sonar shows that the baby was still inside her at the time?? Wouldn't THAT be something!!
All this bit about the baby having been born and then killed separately is ridiculous anyway. So, suppose they cut the baby out and kill Laci and dump her, then when the baby dies "later", why would they dump him in the same exact place anyway? And the two must've been in the same place, or why else would the currents have brought them to shore so relatively close to one another?