Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WASTING BILLIONS ON THE "GREEN AGENDA"!
The eco-logic Powerhouse | June 2004 | Alan Caruba

Posted on 06/14/2004 8:36:03 PM PDT by TexasCowboy

"It is mind boggling, the billions of dollars that are squandered annually in the name of "protecting the environment".
Nor are these millions, and billions, devoted to just the U.S. environment. They are just as often given away to foreign nations, many of which have a track record of corruption.


I was thinking about this as I read a speech given in Stockholm, Sweden, on March 2, by John F. Turner, an Assistant Secretary for Oceans and International Environment and Scientific Affairs.
If Turner were any more Green, he'd glow in the dark. He represents a vast Fifth Column of Greens that are everywhere in our government, having been attracted by fellow travelers, like Al Gore and Bill Clinton.
They are in many agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Interior, and, like Turner, even in the State Department.

The title of his speech was, "Uncle Sam: An Environmentalist."
Who can argue with that? Easily, a third, or more, of all federal laws and regulations are devoted to the environment. This was accomplished in a relatively short time since the first Earth Day in 1970.
And it began when a Republican President, Richard M. Nixon, signed into law the National Environmental Policy Act, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, and arguably, one of the worst pieces of environmental legislation, the Endangered Species Act.

Turner proudly told his colleagues in Stockholm that the federal government owns lots and lots of the American landmass, citing the 84.5 million acres of our national park system, and the 460 million acres that the government manages as wildlife reserves, refuges, wilderness areas, and marine sanctuaries.
Americans who live in the West know well how much land the U.S. owns, but most Americans remain unaware of the relentless efforts of the federal government, using taxpayer dollars, to provide funds to the States to purchase more, and more, private property.

The U.S. government is engaged in one of the biggest land grabs in history, and they are doing it in collusion with a matrix of so-called environmental and conservation non-government organizations.
They are doing it using your money!
If successful, there will be fewer, and fewer, places for people to live, create new businesses, ranch, farm, or use our natural resources in any fashion, i.e., mine it, drill it, or log it.

This what the Greens call, "sustainable development". If they were honest about it - which they never are - they should call it, "no development".

What makes the Bush administration's environmental programs so bizarre are the millions being spent on projects such as the Congo Basin Forest Partnership.
"The United States will contribute $53 million over four years to create the training programs, infrastructure, and management and enforcement regimes necessary to make a vision of a system of protected areas a success", said Turner.
He bragged that, "In total, we have the potential of developing as many as 27 national parks, and protecting more than 10 million hectares". In the African Congo![emphasis mine]

And that's just the tip of the iceberg.
The U.S., noted Turner, will let some countries reduce their debt by agreeing to "protect valuable tropical forests".
Peru, for example, won't have to pay what it owes us, in return for preserving 12.5 million hectares of rain forest. What Turner doesn't mention is that logging is one of the ways Peruvians have of making a living, and depriving them of that, much as was done to many American logging communities in our Northwestern states, will destroy an important element of that nation's economy.

It was a long speech filled with similiar examples, where American tax dollars either are paid out, or foreign debt written off - in the name of saving the environment.
And you wonder why this nation has a huge deficit?
Money that should be used to support our military, returned to the States to build highways, renovate old schools, fix up local parks and recreation areas, fix sewage systems, and so much more, is going to the Congo, and who knows where else!

I can't, however, let go of Turner's speech without noting his view of the Kyoto Protocol on Climate Change, otherwise known as the global warming treaty.
Mind you, the Senate unanimously passed a resolution rejecting it. Clinton never even submitted it for consideration, and Bush let it be known that it was "seriously flawed" in terms of bogus science.
But, John F. Turner of the U.S. Department of State told his audience that: "We remain active in the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, and support it's ultimate goal: the stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations at a level that will prevent dangerous human interference with the climate."
NO, WE DO NOT!
This is not the policy of the United States, unless Turner knows something that the Congress, and the White House, does not.
And, apparently he does. Turner noted that "the United States has cemented 13 formal bilateral relationships with both developed, and developing, nations to address climate change."
Here's the kicker! "What's more, the U.S. spends 1.7 billion annually on climate science and related science, more than the rest of the world combined."
It gets worse!
"Over the next five years, the United States has pledged 1.7 billion to develop clean, hydrogen-powered automobiles." That's billions - with a "B" - for an automobile that nobody wants, or needs.

The waste of tax dollars in the name of the environment is beyond comprehension, but it illustrates just how totally infiltrated the federal government is, with both legislators and civil servants, who feel free to ignore the best interests of Americans.
In the process, they are destroying the key element of our economy: private property, and, in the name of "sustainable development", seeking to thwart every manner of development."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: environazis; environment; envirowacos; greenagenda; greenies; greens; landgrab
Environmentalists are green leeches.
They are sucking the blood out of our nation.
1 posted on 06/14/2004 8:36:04 PM PDT by TexasCowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TexasCowboy

"Environmentalists are green leeches.
They are sucking the blood out of our nation."
Yeah, what you said.


2 posted on 06/14/2004 8:38:10 PM PDT by Commander8 (Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth? Galatians 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub; HiJinx; B4Ranch; Jim Robinson; LadyX; blackie; Eaker; humblegunner; ...
Let it be said that GW trimmed some of the animals off the Endangered list proposed by the Greenies.
If we had Al Gore as President, earthworms would now be endangered.

Another big reason to keep the Democratic idiots out of power!

3 posted on 06/14/2004 8:43:34 PM PDT by TexasCowboy (COB1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCowboy
Another big reason to keep the Democratic idiots out of power!

November's coming, and I'm burning up the ether with e-mails...

4 posted on 06/14/2004 8:46:26 PM PDT by HiJinx (Go with courage, go with honor, go in God's good Grace. Come home when it's time. We'll be here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexasCowboy
Another big reason to keep the Democratic idiots out of power!

Well said, Big Guy!!

5 posted on 06/14/2004 9:00:17 PM PDT by Iowa Granny (Impersonating June Cleaver since 1967)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexasCowboy
"If Turner were any more Green, he'd glow in the dark."


6 posted on 06/14/2004 9:02:34 PM PDT by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub (Want better gun control? Try eating more carrots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCowboy
The U.S. government is engaged in one of the biggest land grabs in history, and they are doing it in collusion with a matrix of so-called environmental and conservation non-government organizations. They are doing it using your money! If successful, there will be fewer, and fewer, places for people to live, create new businesses, ranch, farm, or use our natural resources in any fashion, i.e., mine it, drill it, or log it. This what the Greens call, "sustainable development". If they were honest about it - which they never are - they should call it, "no development".

They should call it "Communism", which is the endstate of the EPA and Green wackos. Private property is disappearing before our eyes.

7 posted on 06/14/2004 10:22:44 PM PDT by Captain Rabbit (Kuck Ferry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Rabbit; All
What most people don't know is that this is not a United States of America effort.
This effort by the environmentalists is world wide, and funded by some of the biggest money people in the world.
8 posted on 06/14/2004 10:25:37 PM PDT by TexasCowboy (COB1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: TexasCowboy; Dog Gone; Grampa Dave; BOBTHENAILER
They're giving America...

GANG-GREEN!!!

10 posted on 06/14/2004 10:46:05 PM PDT by SierraWasp (Democrats are developing a drumbeat of disdain for America's values!!! Disdain the Fraidycrats!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCowboy
A news blurb Monday said that the attempt to reintroduce salmon in to the Connecticut River ended up costing about
$58K/fish that came back [to spawn]. Heck, I bet in Tokyo, a salmon filet doesn't cost $29,000.
11 posted on 06/14/2004 10:51:13 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke; SierraWasp
There are very few actual environmentalists in the world.
They have hundreds of thousands of pawns they use for their purpose, and their purpose is not to save the environment.
Their purpose and their goal is world wide Socialism.

There is a network whose tentacles spread all over the globe, and it is working toward the destruction of our society.
A little research into our environmental policies should scare any American to death.

I researched it when four firefighters burned to death because the helicopters couldn't pick up water from a stream with "endangered" salmon.
We won't be safe until the ESA is defunded and the EPA disbanded.

12 posted on 06/14/2004 11:04:45 PM PDT by TexasCowboy (COB1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Papatom
If our politicians governed IAW the original intent of the Constitution, they would not possess more than DC and a few necessary military installations.

The Constitution does not give the federal government the right to acquire land for environment purposes.

Yup. And how does the government pay for this land that they acquire? They either use money collected from its citizens or equally terrifying they simply print off more money. When we allow elected officials the ability to make their own money and then sit idly by while they use this money to buy from private citizens, we are doing ourselves and the ideals of our nation a disservice.

13 posted on 06/14/2004 11:04:49 PM PDT by Captain Rabbit (Kuck Ferry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TexasCowboy
The waste of tax dollars in the name of the environment is beyond comprehension..

Don't like enviro-whackos, I know about the hundreds of thousands that contract malaria because the watermelons (green oustide, red inside) jerks work to restrict/eliminate minuscule uses of DDT...but I do believe the gov. has some role to play in reducing the really icky things that indsutry/agriculture can leave behind.

I'd really just as soon not have a a plant reducing PbS next to my house without controls.

14 posted on 06/14/2004 11:20:49 PM PDT by fourdeuce82d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fourdeuce82d
"I'd really just as soon not have a a plant reducing PbS next to my house without controls."

Control begats control.

This is not the federal government's job.
This is the job of the States.

15 posted on 06/14/2004 11:40:16 PM PDT by TexasCowboy (COB1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TexasCowboy
This is not the federal government's job. This is the job of the States.

In principle, that's fine. But what if your state is immediatly downstream from another state which has zero controls over effulent?

16 posted on 06/14/2004 11:48:10 PM PDT by fourdeuce82d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TexasCowboy; SierraWasp

If the Enviral Whacko Jihadists were honest, the above would be their flag, symbol and logo!

17 posted on 06/15/2004 5:54:03 AM PDT by Grampa Dave ( Moore knew about the abuses in the Iraqi prisons, why didn't he say, "Stop it,, then!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fourdeuce82d
It has always behooved every State in the Union to work out reciprocity agreements with the neighboring States.
This method has always worked before, but now a bureaucrat in Washington thinks he can manage every State's affairs better than the people who live there.

This has nothing to do with the protection of people's lives or the environment and everything to do with control.

18 posted on 06/15/2004 5:59:54 AM PDT by TexasCowboy (COB1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TexasCowboy

There are a growing number of city governments, school districts, etc. that mandate that Green design policies be incorporated into new builing projects. It is a total farce and mandated fraud.


19 posted on 06/15/2004 6:04:06 AM PDT by NorseWood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson