Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Medicaid: Mississippi gives, then takes away benefits
Sun Herald.com ^ | Sun, Jun. 13, 2004 | EMILY WAGSTER PETTUS -Associated Press

Posted on 06/13/2004 6:46:05 PM PDT by WKB

JACKSON, Miss. - In 1999, when the economy was robust and Mississippi's budget was flush, lawmakers voted to expand the state Medicaid program.

Instead of allowing coverage only for people with incomes up to 100 percent of the poverty level, legislators stretched the upper limit to include people with incomes up to 135 percent.

It was, lawmakers said, the right thing to do in one of the poorest and unhealthiest states in the nation.

Now, with a sluggish economy and an ever-tightening state budget, Mississippi is cutting Medicaid eligibility back to 100 percent of poverty level, amid protests from some lawmakers who say the changes are cruel and heartless.

Using current federal poverty guidelines, that means the income cutoff is $9,310 for one person at 100 percent of poverty level instead of $12,569 for one person at 135 percent.

Dr. Warren Jones, executive director of Mississippi Medicaid since January, acknowledged the changes will be difficult for many people but said they're necessary to keep the program financially solvent.

"When we used to have a $150 million surplus in the Medicaid program, we could say we want to expand that population, give them additional services," Jones, who was appointed by Republican Gov. Haley Barbour, said in an interview with The Associated Press last week.

"Now we're running a $200 million per year deficit. So we've got to find a way to really continue to provide those essential services and still make this program available," Jones said.

The changes are set to take effect July 1, and 65,000 Medicaid recipients have been sent letters saying they're being removed from the program. Medicaid is paid by state and federal dollars and provides coverage for the needy, aged, blind and disabled and for low-income families with children.

About 60,000 of those people will be covered by Medicare, which is paid completely by federal funds, but there are widespread concerns that the Medicare prescription coverage will leave some with burdensome out-of-pocket expenses.

Barbour says he's seeking federal waivers to let Medicaid keep covering the other 5,000 people. But the state won't know until after July 1 whether the waivers are approved. That's the first day of the state budget year.

Barbour also is asking federal permission to guarantee continued Medicaid coverage for four groups of patients: those who have undergone organ transplants, those with end-stage kidney disease who need dialysis, cancer patients who are taking chemotherapy or radiation and people on anti-psychotic drugs.

The bill passed by lawmakers and signed by Barbour specifies the need to continue coverage for transplant, dialysis and cancer patients. Jones said Medicaid officials made an administrative decision to continue coverage for those on anti-psychotic drugs.

Kathy Snyder of Leakesville received one of the cutoff letters and told lawmakers last week she doesn't know how she'll manage. After working at discount and grocery stores all her adult life, she says she has undergone back surgery and two hip replacements and has had heart problems.

She takes 13 prescriptions, seven of which are paid by Medicaid and six paid by her children.

"Are we all supposed to walk to the highest cliff in Mississippi and jump off?" a tearful Snyder asked during a meeting of the House Public Health and Human Services Committee.

Legislators approved the Medicaid changes during the final days of their regular session last month, but some now say they regret doing so.

Most House members say they want Barbour to give them a chance to keep those 65,000 people on Medicaid - but it's looking unlikely that Barbour will back off the moneysaving measure.

"I am not sure exactly how it happened, but I apparently have a new physician," Kathy Jean Brown of Tupelo, who's losing Medicaid coverage, told lawmakers at the Capitol last week.

"Without actually accessing the medical records which chronicle the schizo affective disorder I have, Haley says that if I cannot afford to pay for the necessary medications and office visits on my own, even though it is the only way I am functionally 'normal,' then the state of Mississippi will not help me, either," Brown read from a letter she had written.

Rep. Mark Formby, R-Picayune, says he voted against expanding Medicaid five years ago. But like many in Barbour's own party, Formby now wants to keep benefits for everyone who's been on the program.

Formby said he "took a lot of abuse" over voting against expansion of Medicaid in the late 1990s.

"Certain things are predictable," he said. "If you spend more money than you have, you're going to get in trouble."

However, Formby said he believes it's wrong to take away benefits people have come to rely on.

"It's cruel," he said. "It's giving a kid a new BB gun for Christmas and then the next day taking it away."


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: healthcare; medicade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

1 posted on 06/13/2004 6:46:06 PM PDT by WKB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LoudRepublicangirl; smonk; Sybeck1; RKB-AFG; dixiechick2000; onyx; flying Elvis; helen crump; ...

Missippy Ping


2 posted on 06/13/2004 6:46:43 PM PDT by WKB (3!~ What we need is more "Christianity in politics" and less "Politics in Christianity")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKB

Mississippi didn't become "one of the poorest and unhealthiest states" overnight, so the question begs: Why is Mississippi such an armpit? Who has been in charge of that state over the last few decades?


3 posted on 06/13/2004 6:51:04 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKB
"Are we all supposed to walk to the highest cliff in Mississippi and jump off?"

Am I supposed to get a 3rd job to pay for your pills? Maybe you could get a 2nd job.

4 posted on 06/13/2004 6:53:37 PM PDT by kdot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKB

The same stuff is going on in Illinois. The gov here wants to expand the medicaid program here as well even under a 2 billion dollar budget deficit. Some people who's income exceed the standard have a spend down or co-pay. That's the amount in excess of the standard compared to their income. They think they should have it all for free-even households who gross $4000 per month. They choose to drive $30,000 SUV's but when it comes to their healthcare they do not feel it is worth paying one cent for.


5 posted on 06/13/2004 6:54:17 PM PDT by LoudRepublicangirl (loudrepublicangirl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Who has been in charge of that state over the last few decades?


Other than the 8 years Kirk Fordice was Gov.
The dims have controled MS politics for over 100 years.


6 posted on 06/13/2004 6:54:18 PM PDT by WKB (3!~ What we need is more "Christianity in politics" and less "Politics in Christianity")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LoudRepublicangirl

They think they should have it all for free-even households who gross $4000 per month. They choose to drive $30,000 SUV's but when it comes to their healthcare they do not feel it is worth paying one cent for.



The New American Way


7 posted on 06/13/2004 6:57:25 PM PDT by WKB (3!~ What we need is more "Christianity in politics" and less "Politics in Christianity")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Black people tend to make less money. Mississippi has the nations highest percentage of black people.


8 posted on 06/13/2004 7:00:17 PM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace (I'm from the government and I'm here to help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WKB

The new American way is pissing me off when I have to pay taxes to fund it.


9 posted on 06/13/2004 7:00:40 PM PDT by LoudRepublicangirl (loudrepublicangirl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LoudRepublicangirl

The new American way is pissing me off when I have to pay taxes to fund it.



I agree 100%


10 posted on 06/13/2004 7:04:19 PM PDT by WKB (3!~ What we need is more "Christianity in politics" and less "Politics in Christianity")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace
Black people tend to make less money. Mississippi has the nations highest percentage of black people.

What does that have to do with anything? DemocRATS want us to believe they have all the answers to overcoming poverty, lack of health care, etc.

As it has been pointed out, RATS have been in charge of Mississippi for 92 out of the last 100 years.

So race has nothing to do with anything. RATism is the problem, not race.

11 posted on 06/13/2004 7:06:04 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

Democrats.


12 posted on 06/13/2004 8:00:53 PM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace
Black people tend to make less money. Mississippi has the nations highest percentage of black people.

So? Vote Republican. In the 2nd District, get out and vote for Clinton LeSuere. (OMG! He's Black!! Vote twice!!!!)

13 posted on 06/13/2004 8:07:33 PM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WKB

What these idiots don't get - the system would have been running in the "RED" by now even if the economy hadn't slowed down. Such programs ALWAYS grow faster than the growth of revenue - it's the nature of government entitlements.

At the 100% of poverty level, there were a lot of folks who found ways to cheat - how many more people found ways to be eligible at 135% of Poverty?

I guess the idiots wanted the budgetary shortfall to come out of public schools? Oh wait - they can't do that - guess they have to raise taxes....yeah, that will fix this problem and the economy at the same time.....UGH!

When is the government going to learn to abide by the rule that we as individuals should live by - don't spend more than you've got????


14 posted on 06/13/2004 8:54:52 PM PDT by TheBattman (Leadership = http://www.georgewbush.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKB

I hate how the word "needy" is always
cavalierly tossed around, without bothering
to explain the ALL contributing circumstances.


15 posted on 06/13/2004 10:01:34 PM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kdot
She takes 13 prescriptions, seven of which are paid by Medicaid and six paid by her children.

What could you possibly need 13 prescriptions for? How many failing organs could one person have? I can see one for thyroid, another for diabetes, another for heart --- but 13??? She expects she shouldn't have to pay for any?

16 posted on 06/13/2004 10:12:51 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I hate how the word "needy" is always cavalierly tossed around, without bothering to explain the ALL contributing circumstances.



The line between needs and wants has been blurred slightly
in the last few hundred years or so.


17 posted on 06/14/2004 2:53:34 AM PDT by WKB (3!~ What we need is more "Christianity in politics" and less "Politics in Christianity")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: WKB; onyx

The article is misleading. The only people being cut off are 65,000 aged and disabled. The welfare queens and "single mothers," their children, et al, will continue to be fully covered by Medicaid. The only people being cut off are the ones who actually worked and paid their taxes for years. The others will continue to be covered even if above poverty level.


18 posted on 06/14/2004 8:59:03 AM PDT by MagnoliaMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MagnoliaMS; onyx
Not much has been said about the waivers that Haley said he could get from the Fed Govt. either.
There is a lot of confusion on this.
They will use the tobacco money before they will lose a vote. PS Did you kill the snake ?
19 posted on 06/14/2004 9:04:03 AM PDT by WKB (3!~ What we need is more "Christianity in politics" and less "Politics in Christianity")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: WKB

Trial lawyers have run Miss for forty years--even more than most states.


20 posted on 06/14/2004 9:08:11 AM PDT by Mamzelle (for a post-neo conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson