Posted on 06/13/2004 6:46:05 PM PDT by WKB
JACKSON, Miss. - In 1999, when the economy was robust and Mississippi's budget was flush, lawmakers voted to expand the state Medicaid program.
Instead of allowing coverage only for people with incomes up to 100 percent of the poverty level, legislators stretched the upper limit to include people with incomes up to 135 percent.
It was, lawmakers said, the right thing to do in one of the poorest and unhealthiest states in the nation.
Now, with a sluggish economy and an ever-tightening state budget, Mississippi is cutting Medicaid eligibility back to 100 percent of poverty level, amid protests from some lawmakers who say the changes are cruel and heartless.
Using current federal poverty guidelines, that means the income cutoff is $9,310 for one person at 100 percent of poverty level instead of $12,569 for one person at 135 percent.
Dr. Warren Jones, executive director of Mississippi Medicaid since January, acknowledged the changes will be difficult for many people but said they're necessary to keep the program financially solvent.
"When we used to have a $150 million surplus in the Medicaid program, we could say we want to expand that population, give them additional services," Jones, who was appointed by Republican Gov. Haley Barbour, said in an interview with The Associated Press last week.
"Now we're running a $200 million per year deficit. So we've got to find a way to really continue to provide those essential services and still make this program available," Jones said.
The changes are set to take effect July 1, and 65,000 Medicaid recipients have been sent letters saying they're being removed from the program. Medicaid is paid by state and federal dollars and provides coverage for the needy, aged, blind and disabled and for low-income families with children.
About 60,000 of those people will be covered by Medicare, which is paid completely by federal funds, but there are widespread concerns that the Medicare prescription coverage will leave some with burdensome out-of-pocket expenses.
Barbour says he's seeking federal waivers to let Medicaid keep covering the other 5,000 people. But the state won't know until after July 1 whether the waivers are approved. That's the first day of the state budget year.
Barbour also is asking federal permission to guarantee continued Medicaid coverage for four groups of patients: those who have undergone organ transplants, those with end-stage kidney disease who need dialysis, cancer patients who are taking chemotherapy or radiation and people on anti-psychotic drugs.
The bill passed by lawmakers and signed by Barbour specifies the need to continue coverage for transplant, dialysis and cancer patients. Jones said Medicaid officials made an administrative decision to continue coverage for those on anti-psychotic drugs.
Kathy Snyder of Leakesville received one of the cutoff letters and told lawmakers last week she doesn't know how she'll manage. After working at discount and grocery stores all her adult life, she says she has undergone back surgery and two hip replacements and has had heart problems.
She takes 13 prescriptions, seven of which are paid by Medicaid and six paid by her children.
"Are we all supposed to walk to the highest cliff in Mississippi and jump off?" a tearful Snyder asked during a meeting of the House Public Health and Human Services Committee.
Legislators approved the Medicaid changes during the final days of their regular session last month, but some now say they regret doing so.
Most House members say they want Barbour to give them a chance to keep those 65,000 people on Medicaid - but it's looking unlikely that Barbour will back off the moneysaving measure.
"I am not sure exactly how it happened, but I apparently have a new physician," Kathy Jean Brown of Tupelo, who's losing Medicaid coverage, told lawmakers at the Capitol last week.
"Without actually accessing the medical records which chronicle the schizo affective disorder I have, Haley says that if I cannot afford to pay for the necessary medications and office visits on my own, even though it is the only way I am functionally 'normal,' then the state of Mississippi will not help me, either," Brown read from a letter she had written.
Rep. Mark Formby, R-Picayune, says he voted against expanding Medicaid five years ago. But like many in Barbour's own party, Formby now wants to keep benefits for everyone who's been on the program.
Formby said he "took a lot of abuse" over voting against expansion of Medicaid in the late 1990s.
"Certain things are predictable," he said. "If you spend more money than you have, you're going to get in trouble."
However, Formby said he believes it's wrong to take away benefits people have come to rely on.
"It's cruel," he said. "It's giving a kid a new BB gun for Christmas and then the next day taking it away."
Missippy Ping
Mississippi didn't become "one of the poorest and unhealthiest states" overnight, so the question begs: Why is Mississippi such an armpit? Who has been in charge of that state over the last few decades?
Am I supposed to get a 3rd job to pay for your pills? Maybe you could get a 2nd job.
The same stuff is going on in Illinois. The gov here wants to expand the medicaid program here as well even under a 2 billion dollar budget deficit. Some people who's income exceed the standard have a spend down or co-pay. That's the amount in excess of the standard compared to their income. They think they should have it all for free-even households who gross $4000 per month. They choose to drive $30,000 SUV's but when it comes to their healthcare they do not feel it is worth paying one cent for.
Who has been in charge of that state over the last few decades?
Other than the 8 years Kirk Fordice was Gov.
The dims have controled MS politics for over 100 years.
They think they should have it all for free-even households who gross $4000 per month. They choose to drive $30,000 SUV's but when it comes to their healthcare they do not feel it is worth paying one cent for.
The New American Way
Black people tend to make less money. Mississippi has the nations highest percentage of black people.
The new American way is pissing me off when I have to pay taxes to fund it.
The new American way is pissing me off when I have to pay taxes to fund it.
I agree 100%
What does that have to do with anything? DemocRATS want us to believe they have all the answers to overcoming poverty, lack of health care, etc.
As it has been pointed out, RATS have been in charge of Mississippi for 92 out of the last 100 years.
So race has nothing to do with anything. RATism is the problem, not race.
Democrats.
So? Vote Republican. In the 2nd District, get out and vote for Clinton LeSuere. (OMG! He's Black!! Vote twice!!!!)
What these idiots don't get - the system would have been running in the "RED" by now even if the economy hadn't slowed down. Such programs ALWAYS grow faster than the growth of revenue - it's the nature of government entitlements.
At the 100% of poverty level, there were a lot of folks who found ways to cheat - how many more people found ways to be eligible at 135% of Poverty?
I guess the idiots wanted the budgetary shortfall to come out of public schools? Oh wait - they can't do that - guess they have to raise taxes....yeah, that will fix this problem and the economy at the same time.....UGH!
When is the government going to learn to abide by the rule that we as individuals should live by - don't spend more than you've got????
I hate how the word "needy" is always
cavalierly tossed around, without bothering
to explain the ALL contributing circumstances.
What could you possibly need 13 prescriptions for? How many failing organs could one person have? I can see one for thyroid, another for diabetes, another for heart --- but 13??? She expects she shouldn't have to pay for any?
I hate how the word "needy" is always cavalierly tossed around, without bothering to explain the ALL contributing circumstances.
The line between needs and wants has been blurred slightly
in the last few hundred years or so.
The article is misleading. The only people being cut off are 65,000 aged and disabled. The welfare queens and "single mothers," their children, et al, will continue to be fully covered by Medicaid. The only people being cut off are the ones who actually worked and paid their taxes for years. The others will continue to be covered even if above poverty level.
Trial lawyers have run Miss for forty years--even more than most states.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.