Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
It's 'legal' for States/Counties to regulate the public sale of booze or vitamins. But it's not Constitutional for them to ban personal possession or consumption. -- Get it yet?
Do you really think someone driving through a dry County in their booze stocked RV is breaking the law?

I didn't say ban, I said regulat, there's a difference. Since not all these nutritional substances actually do anything for you there's a good reason to ban a bunch of them anyway, selling placebos as medicine is fraud.

And, - as I said above, - fraud is a crime. So are unconstitutional prohibitions on possessing private property.

But the dry counties COULD ban consumption of alcohol.

Of course , -- they can violate our rule of law, -- but not constitutionally.

Much like how all the states currently ban consumption of alcohol for people under 21. Bans ARE possible.

Yep, minors have not attained their full rights. They are justly regulated, constitutionally.

rights/ powers, you're just word quibling now. Life is far too short to word quible. Read it plenty of times thanks, apparently a lot more often than you. Better back off the insults pal I'm getting sick of them.

You're imagining things. -- I've made no insults.

I'm not supporting ANY bans, learn to read. Quote ONE single spot where I'm supoort a ban. I'm arguing against adding rights that never have existed, that's NOT supporting a ban. Read the 10th and 14th many many times. There's no telling any one not to in either of them, you're adding stuff that's not there. Muych like how your adding support for a ban to my argument.
Read it and you were wrong. End the insults NOW.
Yeah I get it, you're giving mre positions I don't have, putting things in the consitution that aren't there, and generally being an insulting ass. Get it.

"End the insults NOW"? -- Then you call me an "ass" in the next sentence? How weird.

They'd only be breaking the law if the county in question bans possession. I don't know of any that do, so the answer would be no.

Good. we agree.

Now if you're next reply is an insult laden piece of junk that give me positions I never had don't evben bother to right it, I won't be reading it. Be polite, or buzz off.

Why would I be impolite, when you just admitted I was right all along?
Thanks.

128 posted on 06/10/2004 4:54:57 PM PDT by tpaine (The line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being" -- Solzhenitsyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine

Two sentences and you're already being a condescending insulting twit. I don't need your kind of person in my life, goodbye, don't reply, I'm not reading it.


138 posted on 06/11/2004 8:00:57 AM PDT by discostu (Brick urgently required, must be thick and well kept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson