To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; Brad's Gramma
I'm referring to the discomfort expressed publicly by major media figures about how the Reagan coverage is unbalanced — and how his supposed failures need to be dissected and lovingly dissected. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Just like they spent the week of Diana's death and funeral talking about all her weaknesses and failings. That coverage was fully balanced. /sarcasm
5 posted on
06/09/2004 12:14:44 AM PDT by
kayak
(In Memoriam ~ Ronald Wilson Reagan ~ 1911-2004)
To: kayak
To paraphrase Orwell, "some coverage is more balanced than others".
I'm sort of enjoying watching the left have a meltdown.
6 posted on
06/09/2004 12:33:43 AM PDT by
kb2614
(".....We've done nothing and were all out of ideas!!")
To: kayak
The pressitutes/propagandist only want BAD/EVIL things to fill the news 24/7 to bring down the spirits of Americans to where they were when President Reagan took office.
The pressitutes are evil people, just as the Soviet Union was evil.
8 posted on
06/09/2004 4:28:01 AM PDT by
GailA
(hanoi john kerry, I'm for the death penalty, before I impose a moratorium on it.)
To: kayak
"Well 'royalty' is a bad thing but she was truly the peoples' princess." < /sarcasm >
10 posted on
06/09/2004 12:48:09 PM PDT by
weegee
(Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. ~~Ronald Reagan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson