Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

URI physics employee invents new antenna technology
University of Rhode Island News Bureau ^ | June 2, 2004 | Jan Wenzel

Posted on 06/08/2004 7:53:01 PM PDT by Denver Ditdat

URI physics employee invents new antenna technology

Media Contact: Jan Wenzel, 401-874-2116

KINGSTON, R.I. -- June 2, 2004 -- Rob Vincent, an employee in the University of Rhode Island's Physics Department, proves the adage that necessity is the mother of invention.

An amateur radio operator since he was 14, Vincent has always lived in houses situated on small lots. Because he couldn’t erect a large antenna on a confined property, he has been continually challenged over the years to find a way to get better reception.

"I was always tinkering in the basement. Thank goodness, my parents were tolerant. I can still remember my poor father driving up our driveway after a hard day’s work to see wires wrapped around the house," Vincent recalls.

"The Holy Grail of antenna technology is to create a small antenna with high efficiency and wide bandwidth," explains Vincent. "According to current theory, you have to give up one of the three—size, efficiency, or bandwidth—to achieve the other two."

After decades of experimentation, combined with a 30-year engineering career and Yankee ingenuity, Vincent has invented a revolutionary antenna technology. The distributed- load, monopole antennas are smaller, produce high efficiency, and retain good to excellent bandwidth. And they have multiple applications.

With this technology it will be possible to double, at minimum, the range of walkie-talkies used by police, fire, and other municipal personnel. Naval ships, baby monitors, and portable antennas for military use are other applications. An antenna could be mounted on a chip in a cell phone and be applied to wireless local area networks. Another application deals with radio frequency identification, which is expected someday to replace the barcode system.

"It could even make the Dick Tracy wrist radio with all the features, such as Internet access, a possibility," Vincent says.

The inventor pursued his quest to build a better antenna in earnest eight years ago when he and his significant other moved into a house situated on a 50-foot by 100-foot lot in Warwick. There was nothing on the commercial market that could fit the lot that would provide the performance Vincent needed to be heard in distant lands and that would be acceptable to his neighbors. All the small antennas being sold were inefficient and lacked bandwidth, which resulted in low performance and high frustration.

Vincent looked at the techniques that were currently used to reduce antenna size and realized something was missing in the way everyone was approaching the problem.

He began to model various combinations into a computer program called MathCad. His first attempt produced a 21 MHz band antenna that was 18 inches high. Normally, antennas for this band are 12 to 24 feet high.

Vincent installed the antenna in his back yard. The legal limit that amateurs can operate is 1,000 watts with the norm being 100 watts. The amateur radio operator experimented with 5 to 10 watts. He reached a station in Chile and made contacts in various European countries. Meanwhile he kept adding power until it reached 100 watts. That’s when things suddenly went bad. Walking outside in the backyard, he understood why. The antenna had melted.

After examining the molten matter, Vincent wasn’t discouraged. This was only a small model and not designed to handle much power. The part of the antenna that failed proved to be the key to the design. After analyzing the failure, Vincent realized that he was able to transform a lot of current along the antenna with even relatively low power.

"Antennas radiate by setting up large amounts of current flow through various parts of their structure," he says. "The larger the current the more radiation and the better the output of the antenna."

Vincent went back to the drawing board and continued to improve the technology. Relying on his nearly 30 years at Raytheon Co. and at KVH Industries in Middletown R.I., which provided him with a diversified background in electronics and electronic systems, Vincent overcame a myriad of problems and succeeded.

He established three test sites for various prototypes. Antennas were placed in Westport, Mass. in a salt marsh, the best ground for transmission and reception. Another set of antennas was placed on rocky ground in Cumberland, R.I., the worst kind of site, and at a Warwick site which is in between the two in terms of grounding. The antennas, which resemble flagpoles, worked well at all locations.

Tests confirmed that Vincent has created antennas at one third to one ninth of their full size counterparts. Normally smaller antennas are only 8 to 15 percent efficient. Vincent’s antennas achieved 80 to 100 percent efficiency as compared to the larger antennas.

A patent is pending on Vincent's technology. The inventor has made the University of Rhode Island and its Physics Department partners that will benefit from any revenue his invention earns. "The University and its Physics Department has been very supportive and given me time and space to work on this project," says Vincent who was recently presented the 2004 Outstanding Intellectual Property Award by URI's Research Office. "I couldn't have done this without the University's support. It's only fair that it share in the profits."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: aerials; amateur; amateurradio; antenna; ham; hamradio; kurtnsterba; techindex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Tallguy

Can you hear me now?

Good!


21 posted on 06/08/2004 9:08:54 PM PDT by null and void (In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is clearly delusional - He's SEEING things...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BearWash

Yes it is vague.

On top of that you don't "test" an antenna by seeing "how far it will go". You make field strength measurements relative to and/or with a reference antenna under controlled conditions.

Very odd article.

I hope it's true.


22 posted on 06/08/2004 9:13:00 PM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BearWash; Denver Ditdat; Bear_in_RoseBear; Wneighbor; Professional Engineer; Ramius; ...
"Is this article intentionally vague on the details of the technology or is it just me? Other then "distributed load monopole" there isn't much beef there..."

N8BSG here...

Sounds to me like a loop antenna, where the height of the stack of windings of the loop would be 18 inches, for instance.


23 posted on 06/08/2004 9:27:48 PM PDT by Screaming_Gerbil (Let's Roll...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball
I need a AM antenna for the car and the home that will get me the stations I want with no interference.

I got the same problem. I want an antenna that, after the sun goes down, will pick up something besides Mexi-polka.

24 posted on 06/08/2004 9:38:48 PM PDT by uglybiker (I misspell ekxentric on purpose just to be different)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker; Denver Ditdat; Bear_in_RoseBear; Wneighbor; Professional Engineer; Ramius; ...
Loop antenna design examples (linked to articles - click on the pictures):


25 posted on 06/08/2004 9:43:11 PM PDT by Screaming_Gerbil (Let's Roll...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

ping


26 posted on 06/08/2004 9:43:19 PM PDT by aposiopetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gargoyle

> I guess stock, investment or patent agent is
> not pertinent to Mr. Vincent.

It appears that he's savvy enough to take advantage
of URI resources. Individuals filing for patents is
nearly a sucker bet, but if you can get an experienced
entity to do the heavy lifting (and litigate against
infringers), it's easily worth splitting the proceeds.

I trust that everyone realizes that if this isn't the
cold fusion of antennae (i.e. is legit, and as claimed),
it will revolutionize all wireless devices - cell, wLAN,
FRS, cordless, TV, radio, satellites and spacecraft
generally, UAVs and remotely operated stuff generally,
Bluetooth, car door openers, remote controls, you name it.

Even a royalty under 1 cent per aerial could make this
guy extremely rich.


27 posted on 06/08/2004 9:46:31 PM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DB

What you wanna bet the French and Russians will claim they have someone who did it two days before our guy did it? And the Chinese will claim to have the extact same product already being manufactured somewhere.


28 posted on 06/08/2004 9:55:37 PM PDT by JRPerry (It's Time To Fight Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Denver Ditdat; *tech_index; Libertarianize the GOP

This could be a big deal, especially for cellphones .....


29 posted on 06/09/2004 6:05:17 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

BUMP


30 posted on 06/09/2004 6:30:10 AM PDT by Publius6961 (I don't do diplomacy either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker
I want an antenna that, after the sun goes down, will pick up something besides Mexi-polka.

That isn't a function of your antenna. It is an example of the way the Earth works.

What you are receiving is radio signals that have propgated over long distances by "skipping" between the ground and the ionosphere layer of Earth's atmosphere.

At night, it is likely that your local stations reduce their power output, thereby allowing these skip signals to become more easily received by your radio.


31 posted on 06/09/2004 6:36:38 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,Election '04...It's going to be a bumpy ride,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: randog
Wow, this is big news. I can't wait to see this thing integrated into IC's.

Big news indeed. If this is all it's cracked up to be, I think the potential applications are going to be very far-reaching.

32 posted on 06/09/2004 6:48:21 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vic3O3

Hey check this out!

Semper Fi and 73's


33 posted on 06/09/2004 6:48:48 AM PDT by dd5339 ("We came to change a nation, instead we changed the world" President Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: null and void

....say that.....break...up...swisshhhhh.....


34 posted on 06/09/2004 6:53:22 AM PDT by Tallguy (Surviving in PA....thats the "other PA"...Pennsylvania.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Screaming_Gerbil

I think that I saw that bottom antenna on an episode of "Hogan's Heroes." You know the one where Ivan Kinchloe is doing the cheesey German Accent?!


35 posted on 06/09/2004 6:56:18 AM PDT by Tallguy (Surviving in PA....thats the "other PA"...Pennsylvania.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Denver Ditdat

That's true, but a loaded loop with a high Q, like the AEA's now discontinued Isoloop, is still very efficient. That item has, IIRC, about 30 kHz of bandwidth at 30 MHz, and is 30 inches across. Scaling this, one at 300 MHz would be 3" in diameter and have 3 MHz of bandwidth, which is more than the fire service. That bandwidth would fit 200 NBFM channels at 15 kHz spacing. The antenna would be the size of a doughnut - perfect for police.


36 posted on 06/09/2004 7:08:56 AM PDT by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BearWash
Is this article intentionally vague on the details of the technology

Yes, antenna design is a black art.

37 posted on 06/09/2004 10:08:10 AM PDT by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: July 4th
I really would like to see what these new designs look like.

It is descibed as a "monopole" and said to look like a flagpole.

38 posted on 06/09/2004 12:27:39 PM PDT by oldcomputerguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: oldcomputerguy

Looks suspiciously like a helix-wound monopole:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lW4qpjtj_kE


39 posted on 09/12/2012 3:58:33 PM PDT by _Jim (Conspiracy theories are the favorite tools of the weak-minded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Screaming_Gerbil
"Sounds to me like a loop antenna, where the height of the stack of windings of the loop would be 18 inches, for instance."

Helix-loaded monopole; attempts to force the current to uniformly flow over the helix and mid-sections ...

Any interest in building one?

Rob Vincent's 'slideshow' presentation about making the antenna - www.uri.edu/news/vincent/boxboro_files/frame.htm

40 posted on 09/12/2012 4:07:46 PM PDT by _Jim (Conspiracy theories are the favorite tools of the weak-minded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson