Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VaBthang4
This is from StrategyPage:

June 2, 2004: The U.S. Army, while eager to design and build its new, twenty ton, FCS (Future Combat System) tank, it was reminded in Iraq that the current 65 ton M-1 tank still rules the battlefield. As a result, the current plan is now to keep the M-1 in service until at least 2030. This means that there will be more upgrades for the M-1, including anti-missile systems (using electronic signals, lasers, smoke and whatever works) and battlefield Internet capability. The FSC is seen as too ambitious, depending on too many technologies that are still in the lab, and may never make it to the battlefield, or at least not in the next decade or so.

Link is here.

18 posted on 06/08/2004 7:12:29 PM PDT by michaelt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: michaelt
Some great posts at that site on mbt's..especially the armor/reactive armor and penetrators discussion.

I think Electronic warfare parameters are the key..and one should consider that Pandoras box will indeed open..and we will see EMP and modulating EMP weapons used to defeat interlocking com grids.
Other electronic warfare goodies..designed to backdoor into computers and rewrite the hardware..or tie it up in a loop..which cannot be undone by rebooting.
searing a computer via its attenna and reciever systems.

Mines with kinnetic energy driven spikes...motion sensor, pop up and split a tanks engine block in seconds.

22 posted on 06/08/2004 7:39:07 PM PDT by Light Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson