Posted on 06/08/2004 3:02:43 PM PDT by RaceBannon
Another thread about the same story:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1150090/posts
Obviously.
"which is what is sounds like"
Can you prove what really happened?
"assisting the enemy"
There's no factual info that they assisted anyone. The fact is that the jihadis could have pulled it off w/o them and the consequences could have been more disasterous. Not only that, they had no indication that they were not the targets of jihadi action. The Geneva Conventions hold them to be civilians and the only way to remain that way is to stick to their business and avoid assisting either side.
The media, who were at the scene prior to the attack, told soldiers at the scene they had received a tip to be at that location prior to the attack and they had witnessed the explosionhowever I don't read where it says the media knew it was going to be an attack, only that they should be at a location.
Note that the article is from "palaceofreason"
I agree. Until CENTCOM releases more info, this is a spin by someone in order to create hype.
CENTCOM does NOT say the media knew there would be an attack.
"Prove to me they didn't."
Well, it's pretty frickin' obvious they DIDN'T say anything to the US Military. If they had, I doubt seriously the military would have come rolling through the area unawares.
Obvious, how so? How do you know they were unaware? Folks using what is obvious called the world flat once upon a time.
Who do they turn to if they need assistance?
No.
"is"
Is means there is an identity with objective fact. I didn't see any of that in the title, or lead into the "Palace of Reason" story.
If they need protection, they can hire someone. If it involves criminal action they can call the proper authorities. Some whine that they should have free govm't guard, but that's ridiculous. They are civilians and should get what any civilian is entitled to. That amounts to the freedom to use the Yellow Pages to look for protective services.
But, according to an article posted here a couple of days ago, the media was whining that they needed more protection by our military. I hope they aren't counting on it. LOL!
They definitely should not get it. Most of them are in it as a business, in addititon to their place acting as political ops.
That's their story and they're sticking to it!. I was born at night, but not last night. They knew something bad was going to happen to US troops. They might not have know that it was a 105mm artillery shell (or whatever it was) rigged to go off as the convoy passed, but they knew something.
"A covert intelligence source" would imply that they were under the control, or had pre-arrangements with those to whom they were suppling information.
I guess if I overhear two guys saying they are going to stalk and rape a girl, if I report it to the police, I'm a covert intelligence source?
Actually Islamic Green, tinged perhaps with more than a touch of Red as well.
So you're saying that our military WAS aware, and still rolled through the area, setting off the blast? Wow, you sure do give our military a lot of credit.
Q. What's the difference between a dead lawyer in the road, a dead journalist in the road, and a dead snake in the road?
A. The snake has skid marks IN FRONT of it.
I'm sure they didn't thing the "tip" was to a Wedding Party in the desert. They probably didn't know the details it's true, but it's also irrelevant.
Nope.
Get ready to be VERY angry when you read this crap.
Hey Spunkets!Wake up and smell the KOFI. We are in a WAR! No "journalist" in WWII would have even remotely considered hiding info from the troops he was accompanying. Ernie Pyle is spinning in his grave after hearing this story. Pull their press credentials and send them back to La La land to cover flower shows or give 'em a gun and put them up front where they can really see what is going on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.