Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John O
Which is getting to my point. The article was sloppily worded. or the definition of "prefers" was incorrect.

Or maybe you're trying to pick nits because you can't argue with the actual findings.
91 posted on 06/09/2004 12:14:12 PM PDT by Dimensio (Join the Monthly Internet Flash Mob: http://tinyurl.com/3xj9m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio
Or maybe you're trying to pick nits because you can't argue with the actual findings.

You evolution religionists are incredibly defensive. Where did I ever say that I disputed the findings? Or was even interested in doing so? I know that I cannot change your faith and I know that you cannot change mine. I know that God will use whatever methods (including natural selection) He chooses to use to fill any niche that needs to be filled. (I guess you could put me firmly in the creationist/intelligent design group)

However, none of that affects my original statement that the article was improperly worded or uses a definition of "prefers" that is not accurate. Whether or not the science is done correctly the report still should be written to make sense and eliminate confusion.

94 posted on 06/10/2004 4:59:43 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson