Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John O
As it stands now they say balcks and whites are different species. See my point? . As the authors do not say that, I don't see your point. Even had the authors stated such, you haven't posted why you would object.

Again, (giving you one more chance to be evasive), what is your definition of "species"?

64 posted on 06/08/2004 12:15:48 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Doctor Stochastic
"As it stands now they say blacks and whites are different species. See my point? ." As the authors do not say that, I don't see your point. Even had the authors stated such, you haven't posted why you would object.

Missed this earlier and I think it deserves a response. I would object because blacks and whites can interbreed with no problems. There's not enough genetic difference for them to be considered different species. Other than external characteristics (color mostly) I don't know of anything else that is different. Same blood types etc. There is only the human species, not the white species or black species.

95 posted on 06/10/2004 5:07:35 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson