To: RonDog
Thanks for the ping, Ron.
I am now totally confuse. I have read reports that the board had agreed to change the seal to avoid a lawsuit but when I called two of the LA county administrators' offices last week and they told me incorrectly that no decision had been made.
So which is it?
With the death of Ronald Reagan my thoughts have been with him but I hope to continue my quest of fighting any change in the seal.
Semper Fi,
Kelly
5 posted on
06/07/2004 12:17:21 PM PDT by
kellynla
(U.S.M.C. 1/5 1st Mar Div. Nam 69&70 Semper Fi http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnkerry.com)
To: kellynla
They are voting tomorrow about changing the cross to a mission or indigenous people (MORE PAGANS). Supervisor Antonovich announced on Dennis Prager this morning that he is introducing a motion to seek outside counsel since the County Counsel lawyer that advised the Board was biased and did not look at other cases that said the cross did not violate the Constitution.
Keep up the calls to the Supervisors: www.lacounty.info
There are lawyers outside of County employment that are willing to take on the case for FREE!!!!! Keep up the pressure.
8 posted on
06/07/2004 12:46:07 PM PDT by
aCookieMomster
(If my people... will humble themselves and pray...then will I hear...heal their land. 2Chron7:14)
To: kellynla; RonDog
They are talking about a bogus "compromise" where they will "keep the mission" but remove the guilty cross.
Of course, without the cross, the "mission" is just a tiny hut in the seal.
14 posted on
06/07/2004 1:11:28 PM PDT by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson