Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NewRomeTacitus; Happy2BMe; Travis McGee
We certainly aren't the only ones who have noticed the "credibility gap" concerning border enforcement, nor are we the only ones who have posted essays about the administrations "credibility gap" concerning national security.

I am not in fear of a visit from anyone. If this busted up old man is hought of as an enemy, imagine what young men like Trav are considered as.

There's no reason to send someone 'out to visit' me, just turn off my phone lines and you'll never hear from me again. At least not under the name of B4Ranch. LOL

So, I'll just continue to post my thoughts about who and what agencies are making mistakes concerning their Oath of Office "to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

It's during times like this that I wish we had another Ike in the White House.

19 posted on 06/07/2004 1:19:26 AM PDT by B4Ranch (Ignore your rights and they'll go away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: B4Ranch; JackelopeBreeder; Spiff; anon; SJackson; dennisw; Sabertooth; NewRomeTacitus; Happy2BMe; ..
"It's during times like this that I wish we had another Ike in the White House."

We all know beyond a shadow of doubt that if our government had you and me - the bona fide citizens - of this country's best interests at heart, they could as early as tomorrow put troops on our border (what the National Guard was created for) and physically block their entrance.

Those blocking actions would also immediately deny American business the literally billions of dollars a year in increased revenue each year by using cheaper labor (and thus increasing their profit for products produced by said labor), but also deny Mexico from what is factually known to be it's *SECOND LARGEST SOURCE OF REVENUE* after native oil production - namely the influx of money from the United States earned by the same said migrant work force.

We know it is happening. And both governments knows we know it is happening. An agreement has been made at the highest echelons of both our's and Mexico's (and probably Canada's and most South American nations) that this *RECIPROCAL* and unofficial agreement will be allowed to continue on until or unless the people of the United States became so resistant to it the practice would no longer be tolerated.

But by the sheer volumes of migrants already here and being permitted to flood in by reason of planned inaction on the part of either government, it is quickly becoming physically and politically impossible for such an uprising to occur without extreme risk and mortal peril on the part of those in opposition to said invasion.

The result of all this will be the intentional and eventual melding of Mexico to the United States and the United States no longer existing as an entity in and of itself and apart from Mexico.

These things are evident to all of us and these "pandering" motions put forth by the government which *appear* to be holding back the invasion are nothing more than eyewash serving only to buy more time to allow the eventual outcome we see shaping into reality with each passing month and year.

What other logical conclusion is there?

22 posted on 06/07/2004 1:46:29 AM PDT by Happy2BMe (Ronald Reagan to Islamic Terrorism: YOU CAN RUN - BUT YOU CAN'T HIDE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson