Posted on 06/06/2004 10:21:11 AM PDT by Mia T
Mr. Soros:
Now hear this! We are NOT animals, and this is NOT a farm.
I'm fairly sure the Clintons will be quite pleased to
part you from a goodly chunk of your money. Farms are for
sale. The spirit of America is not.
My only wish concerning Mr. Soros is to have his grave made into a urinal and a have a long line of conservatives waiting to use it.
I wouldn't trust Soros to walk my dog. He is a carpetbagger. I remember back in 1998 he was denouncing the use of derivatives and at the same time his firm was the biggest user of them that I have ever seen.
bump
ping
ping
The Bush Doctine is built on two pillars, one -- that the United States must maintain its absolute military superiority in every part of the world, and second -- that the United States has the right for preemptive action.
Now, both these propositions, taken on their own, are quite valid propositions, but if you put them together, they establish two kinds of sovereignty in the world, the sovereignty of the United States, which is inviolate, not subject to any international constraints, and the rest of the world, which is subject to the Bush Doctrine.
To me, it is reminiscent to [sic] George Orwell's "Animal Farm," that "All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
(Mia, you AMAZE me!)
If one tenth of what is here, on this sole thread, were on the evening news tomorrow night, America would be in an uproar on Tuesday morning. By next Friday, we might well be on the road to recovering this nation's high offices and institutions. With time, our enemies and their machinations would recede into a scummy froth on European shores.
With all of the Islamic horrors captured in digital gory glory (Pearl, Berg, etc.), all of the treason that preceded this administration and the sale of our children's (and the world's) security and the intrusion of obvious Soviet operatives like Soros operating without restraint in economic sabotage and election fraud, what is the point to even having a damned press corps if they just sit around and slurp each other's @sses?
Islamofascist kill because they are fascists grafted into a theology of the insane. krinton and the left betray and poison largely because they are amoral degenerate fascists. The left, in general, works it's evil because they are fascist zealots without sound reasoning or the ability to bear the truth. But, if their is something lower than the press, I'd like to hear about it.
"the sovereignty of the United States, which is inviolate, not subject to any international constraints,"
As it should be. The Supremes (at least two of them) want the U.S. Courts rule according to "International Law" and John Kerry who would instantly hand sovereignty of the U.S. over to the UN and probably dismantle our military and put us under UN control
"and the rest of the world, which is subject to the Bush Doctrine."
Which I don't think is a bad thing considering that doctrine is anti-terrorism and anti-those-who-breed-or-harbor-terrists. And, that doctrine is freedom and liberty to brutally oppressed countries lie Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria and North Korea just to name a few.
The "Bush doctrine" is not bad doctrine in my opinion.
I hope this Soros character runs out of money, is found guilty of something and and is jailed or perhaps his plane will suffer engine failure or something...
Soros is fighting for Kerry.
FBI Files Show Kerry Met With Communists More Than Once
By Marc Morano
CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer
June 04, 2004
(CNSNews.com) - Newly released FBI files reveal that presumed Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry attended a second meeting with North Vietnamese communists in Paris in the early 1970s. Kerry has previously admitted to meeting only once with the North Vietnamese delegations in 1970.
According to the FBI files, Kerry met with representatives from the North Vietnamese government in Paris in 1971 in an effort to secure the release of captured American prisoners of war. Kerry has previously acknowledged meeting "both delegations" of Vietnamese communists in Paris in 1970, but has said nothing of the 1971 meeting.
Researcher and author Jerry Corsi, who began studying the anti-war movement in the early 1970s, believes Kerry is hiding key aspects about his anti-war past from the public as he seeks the presidency.
"Kerry has admitted to one meeting with Madam Binh. Now we have reason to believe there was a second [meeting], so let's press them to admit the second [meeting]," Corsi told CNSNews.com.
"Kerry needs to explain to the American people why he directly went into negotiations with communists," Corsi added. Corsi has written an essay on Kerry's dealings with the Vietemese communists on the Internet site, WinterSoldier.com.
According to Gerald Nicosia, a Kerry supporter and the author of the book Home to War: A History of the Vietnam Veterans' Movement, Kerry's second visit to Paris to meet with emissaries of the North Vietnamese communist government is documented in redacted FBI files from the era.
"The [FBI] files record that Kerry made a second trip to Paris that summer (1971) to learn how the North Vietnamese might release prisoners," Nicosia wrote in an essay in the Los Angeles Times on May 23.
"After deciding not to run [for Congress] in 1970, he and his new wife, Julia Thorne, traveled to France in May to meet Madame Nguyen Thi Binh and other Viet Cong and Communist Vietnamese representatives to the Paris peace talks, a trip he now calls a 'fact-finding mission,"' Nicosia wrote.
Nicosia noted that, "Kerry had tried to distinguish between his own trips to meet with the Vietnamese in Paris, which he considered necessary to fight through the lies of his own government, and actual negotiations with the enemy, which Kerry knew were illegal."
Kerry told the New York Times on April 24 that his first meeting with the Vietnamese communists in 1970 was "not a big deal."
''People were dropping in (at the Paris Peace Talks). It was a regular sort of deal," Kerry explained to the New York Times .
But Corsi believes it was a very big deal.
"You had (Former Nixon aide) Henry Kissinger there (in Paris) trying to negotiate formally with the Paris peace delegation and then these guys (from Vietnam Veterans Against the War) are off on their own side show, establishing back channels to the Vietnamese communists; all of this is against the law," Corsi said, referring to U.S. code 18 U.S.C. 953, which declares it illegal for a U.S. citizen to go abroad and negotiate with a foreign power.
"Exactly who was Kerry ... to have arranged these trips? He had to be in discussion with some link with the communist party of Vietnam in order to establish these trips and meetings," Corsi explained.
Kerry also may have had plans to go to South Vietnam in 1971, according to a June 16, 1971 article in the communist Daily World newspaper.
"Former Navy Lt. John Kerry is planning a three-week trip to South Vietnam in July to report on 'what is really happening' to the GI's there, he told newsmen here," read the article, written by the Daily World's Ted Pearson. Kerry was attending an event in Chicago with Jesse Jackson, who at the time was head of the organization, Operation Bread Basket.
It is unclear whether Kerry ever made the trip to South Vietnam in 1971 and Kerry's campaign did not return several phone calls seeking comment for this article.
Nicosia has criticized Kerry in the past for not being more open about his anti-war past.
"I am in kind of an awkward position here. I am a Kerry supporter and I certainly don't want to do anything that hurts him. On the other hand, my number one allegiance is to truth. So I am going to go with where the facts are, and John is going to have to deal with that," Nicosia told CNSNews.com back in March when the contents of the FBI files became public and caused Kerry to revise his past statements on a series of issues dealing with his past.
"I am having some problems with the things he is saying right now, which are not matching up with accuracy," Nicosia said in March.
"I think [Kerry] may be worried or the people around him may be worried that his association with VVAW (Vietnam Veterans Against the War) is a very negative thing and they want John to back away from it," he added.
Kerry's anti-war activism and his meetings with the communists had a big impact, according to Corsi.
"Vietnamese communists would not have won the war without John Kerry. They were cultivating his protest activity with the VVAW," Corsi said.
Corsi said the Vietnamese communists have shown their gratitude to Kerry by displaying a photo of him at Ho Chi Minh City's Protestors Hall of the War Remnants Museum. The photo of fellow anti-war activist and actress Jane Fonda also appears in the Women's Museum in Saigon.
"As soon as [Kerry] came onto the seen, [the Vietnamese communists] latched on to him like bees on to honey. [The communists] said 'This is a guy who tells our story, it will undermine the sympathy for the war in America,'" Corsi added.
See Related Articles:
Kerry's Meeting With Communists Violated US Law, Says Author
Communists Infiltrated Kerry's Anti-War Group, Historian Says
Kerry Still Backpedaling on Presence at 1971 Anti-War Meetings
Kerry Lying About Anti-War Past, Supporter Alleges
Small correction. Soros is fighting for international governance and the abolition of national sovereignty. He is a commie, through and through. Kerry is just the receptical he is using at the moment.
But the terrorist threat took time off the table,
i.e., time is now on no one's side.
So the question reduces to one of rate.
Rate of conversion. Rate of attrition.
Will we, through the new fiberoptic venues,
convince enough of the electorate fast enough
to reject the Leftist enemy of America
before the other enemy of America,
the islamofascist terrorists,
succeed in destroying us all?
[T]oday's endless ovation for World War II vets doesn't change the fact that this nation has behaved boorishly, with colossal disrespect. If we cared about that war, the men who won it and the ideas it suggests, we would teach our children (at least) four topics: The major battles of the war.... The bestiality of the Japanese. The Japanese army saw captive soldiers as cowards, lower than lice. If we forget this we dishonor the thousands who were tortured and murdered, and put ourselves in danger of believing the soul-corroding lie that all cultures are equally bad or good. Some Americans nowadays seem to think America's behavior during the war was worse than Japan's--we did intern many loyal Americans of Japanese descent. That was unforgivable--and unspeakably trivial compared to Japan's unique achievement, mass murder one atrocity at a time. In "The Other Nuremberg," Arnold Brackman cites (for instance) "the case of Lucas Doctolero, crucified, nails driven through hands, feet and skull"; "the case of a blind woman who was dragged from her home November 17, 1943, stripped naked, and hanged"; "five Filipinos thrown into a latrine and buried alive." In the Japanese-occupied Philippines alone, at least 131,028 civilians and Allied prisoners of war were murdered. The Japanese committed crimes against Allied POWs and Asians that would be hard still, today, for a respectable newspaper even to describe. Mr. Brackman's 1987 book must be read by everyone who cares about World War II and its veterans, or the human race. The attitude of American intellectuals. Before Pearl Harbor but long after the character of Hitlerism was clear--after the Nuremberg laws, the Kristallnacht pogrom, the establishment of Dachau and the Gestapo--American intellectuals tended to be dead set? against the U.S. joining Britain's war on Hitler. Today's students learn (sometimes) about right-wing isolationists like Charles Lindbergh and the America Firsters. They are less likely to read documents like this, which appeared in Partisan Review (the U.S. intelligentsia's No. 1 favorite mag) in fall 1939, signed by John Dewey, William Carlos Williams, Meyer Schapiro and many more of the era's leading lights. "The last war showed only too clearly that we can have no faith in imperialist crusades to bring freedom to any people. Our entry into the war, under the slogan of 'Stop Hitler!' would actually result in the immediate introduction of totalitarianism over here. . . . The American masses can best help [the German people] by fighting at home to keep their own liberties." The intelligentsia acted on its convictions. "By one means or another," Diana Trilling later wrote of this period, "most of the intellectuals of our acquaintance evaded the draft." Why rake up these Profiles in Disgrace? Because in the Iraq War era they have a painfully familiar ring. DAVID GELERNTER |
The time has come to address the real root cause of suicide bombing: incitement by certain religious and political leaders. In Love With Death |
The dernier cri of seditious and corrupt Leftists everywhere, pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic renders the Left, irrespective of policy, no less dangerous to Western civilization than the terrorists they seek to aid and abet. pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic |
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE) johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com
|
Your posts are always fabulous Mia!! Nobody better at HTML than you on the forum.
That is a main item I try to drum into my kids, beware of the U.N.
Great,Great,Great,Great stuff. Thank you Mia T.
"In Soros we trust". Kerry and Kofi--great graphic. You're killing me.
The Soros ThreatThe Capitalist Threat
(1997 article by Soros)
thank YOU :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.