The NY Times front page is a disgrace. More direspectful than I would have expected, even from that paper.
I'm surprised. I expected the following article from the NY Times:
New York (NYT) -- A nation cheered today as Ronald Reagan finally passed on.
The man who had been reviled as the cause of the collapse of the Soviet Union was laid to rest due to complications from Alzheimers.
"I'm glad he's dead," said Lefty Whackmeister, a 63 year old bottle-collecter, "He caused so much suffering by putting this nation through AIDS and homelessness and getting the CIA to distribute crack in black neighborhoods."
The somewhat amusing, befuddled old man was dearly loved by millions of Hitler-worshipping conservatives. His legacy, a stain of corruption including Iran-Contra and the Savings and Loan debacle, was gravely hurt by his destruction of the premiere example of communism in the world -- the Soviet Union. It is for that reason that leftists tend to dislike the man.
Arch Nemesis, a 22 year old heroin addict, spat on the ground. "If it wasn't for Reagan, I'd have a ___ing job."
I can tell you that there is one WORSE than the NYT....The Anniston Star (Alabama), owned by a Clinton-butt boy liberal, had type font no larger than when they run day to day mundane news.....REAGAN DEAD AT 93.....the story was given less than 25% of the front page....disgraceful, but predictable for this agenda driven sorry excuse for a newspaper.