1 posted on
06/05/2004 8:48:53 PM PDT by
natewill
To: *bang_list
I hope he sues the department and the officers into oblivion.
Also, he might have grounds to prosecute them on federal civil Rights violations.
2 posted on
06/05/2004 8:50:22 PM PDT by
Mulder
(Those who would give up liberty for temporary security, deserve neither -- Ben Franklin)
To: natewill
Isn't Michael Pelletier a freeper?
7 posted on
06/05/2004 8:59:03 PM PDT by
lainie
To: mvpel
8 posted on
06/05/2004 9:06:16 PM PDT by
sauropod
(Paleo-cons make better lovers)
To: natewill
Michael Pelletier was browsing a Manchester, N.H New Hampshire prides itself with its state motto, "Live Free or Die." Officials in the countryside still uphold this belief. Unfortunately, Manchester is becoming urban and is succumbing to the liberal line, guns kill. Pelletier should move to get a civil trial away from Manchester. I wonder what statutory limits New Hampshire places on government liability awards?
9 posted on
06/05/2004 9:06:44 PM PDT by
LoneRangerMassachusetts
(Some know what's good for others, some make goods for others; it's the meddlers against the peddlers)
To: natewill
If you don't do anything wrong, you have nothing to fear.
It's for The Children.
15 posted on
06/05/2004 9:14:00 PM PDT by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: mvpel
Just remembered the screen name. What's going on?
18 posted on
06/05/2004 9:15:52 PM PDT by
lainie
To: natewill
29 posted on
06/05/2004 9:25:18 PM PDT by
ATOMIC_PUNK
(‘All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.’ TJefferson)
To: natewill; All
Story hereI think this is the story in his own words !
31 posted on
06/05/2004 9:32:09 PM PDT by
ATOMIC_PUNK
(‘All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.’ TJefferson)
To: natewill; All
Story hereI think this is the story in his own words !
32 posted on
06/05/2004 9:32:59 PM PDT by
ATOMIC_PUNK
(‘All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.’ TJefferson)
To: natewill
38 posted on
06/05/2004 9:42:06 PM PDT by
lowbridge
("You are an American. You are my brother. I would die for you." -Kurdish Sergeant)
To: natewill
To: natewill
"but officers and detectives issued a barrage of questions about why he carries a gun and what kind of training he had" If his training consisted only of potty training, it was obviously better than what these police had.
59 posted on
06/05/2004 10:49:07 PM PDT by
TheCrusader
("the frenzy of the Mohammedans has devastated the churches of God" Pope Urban II)
To: natewill
That's nothing. My father's cousin was hauled to jail this week after a traffic accident. Highway patrol sgt. ran him, and said he had a blue warrant for theft of services, and a parole violation. Wouldn't believe anybody that he had the wrong guy and he'd never been in jail.
Took him to county, and the local judge, who also happens to be a cousin, called county to tell them they had the wrong guy. Trooper wouldn't listen. Judge drove over, argued with them, had to wait until a picture came back, and then the guy looked similar enough, though heavier, that the trooper still wouldn't let him out.
They had to fingerprint him, call Austin, light a fire under their butt by telling them they had a potential lawsuit on their hands, get the actual perps fingerprints. Then they let him out. The trooper told him to stay close to home, because he was sending his prints to Austin to have them doublechecked in the morning.
Turned out they attached the warrant to the wrong record, and he didn't even get an apology.
83 posted on
06/05/2004 11:27:46 PM PDT by
TheLurkerX
(Liberals are the champions of every individual's right to agree with them.)
To: natewill
To challenge that determination and interpretation of the law would require Mr. Pelletier to file an expensive and time-consuming lawsuit," the gunowners say Sometimes you have to work for it...
91 posted on
06/05/2004 11:45:59 PM PDT by
Experiment 6-2-6
(Meega, Nala Kweesta!!!! Support Congressman Billybob! Go to www.Armorforcongress.com!!!)
To: natewill
Pelletier was carrying a pistol openly at the small of his back, which became apparent after he took off his jacket.
Um, in other words, he was carrying a concealed weapon. What kind of trash writing is this? I absolutely back the Second Amendment, I own firearms, and I know how to use them. But this kind of article doens't help us one bit. It's either poorly written, or completely misleading. If your gun is in the small of your back, and only apparent once you take off your jacket, then its not being "openly" carried.
To: natewill
Lawyer time.
Hope he sues the pants off the officers, the department, the store and the town.
164 posted on
06/07/2004 6:46:08 AM PDT by
ZULU
(They weree)
To: natewill
If he had his hands behind his head...how did he remove his jacket?
196 posted on
06/07/2004 7:25:51 PM PDT by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,Election '04...It's going to be a bumpy ride,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson