Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
If you would actually read the material you might find that Shapiro covers these things. He is a biochemist, after all.

Oh, I'm sure that Shapiro knows these things; it's you I wasn't sure about.

If you accept all of this, then I'm afraid I don't see a whole lot of difference between your beliefs and standard evolutionary science.

68 posted on 06/04/2004 12:38:47 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: Physicist
If you accept all of this, then I'm afraid I don't see a whole lot of difference between your beliefs and standard evolutionary science.

If you don't see much difference then you should accept this.

It seems to me that what you are saying throws out Darwinian(or NeoDarwinian) theory of evolution as the "major" means of evolution of life on Earth and now this 21st century evolution sees a much more elegant and orgerly mechanism to induce a guided development of life when needed. [sic]...

Yaakov, you get the message. ...

70 posted on 06/04/2004 12:47:45 PM PDT by AndrewC (I am a Bertrand Russell agnostic, even an atheist.</sarcasm>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson