Agreed, he's just saying, those arguments (which by Farber's other writings he doesn't agree with) are trumped by the one overriding issue: terrorism.
No, he is stating that there were no WMD's in Iraq and that there was no Iraq-Al Qaeda connection. See how fast you can get info on this question from many resources. All these people, Maureen Dowd, Eleanor Clift, Ted Kennedy, it's as easy for them to be properly informed as it is us, easier, they are either being deliberately ignorant or are deliberately attempting to decieve while our American military are in harm's way.
Well, he has a good point.
It's hard to be concerned about the 3 toed snail darter when everyone is dead.
The only real question for this election is "who will do the best job fighting terrorism?" and the answer to that question is self evident.
It's a similar attitude as expressed by former NYC mayor Ed Koch [D] recently, where he stated 'I may disagree with President Bush on everything domestically, but what difference does it make if we're all dead!'.
He gets it, that's why he supports President Bush. Looks like the same can be said for Barry Farber.