Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

China Military Space Power Advancing, Pentagon Reports***Major Chinese space breakthroughs in 2003, as flagged by DoD, include:

Launching and recovering of its first piloted space mission; Launching a new type of a geosynchronous orbit military communication satellite; Orbiting of a new type of film-based imagery satellite; Launching a prototype low Earth orbit communications satellite, a key step in China's development of mini-satellites; and Continuing efforts to investigate various means of tracking and defeating the space systems of potential opponents Anti-satellite to be fielded***

1 posted on 05/31/2004 2:02:02 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Cincinatus' Wife
Crosslinked to:

-2004- the Year of Returning to Space--

2 posted on 05/31/2004 3:09:48 AM PDT by backhoe (--30--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

This is the first article I've heard of in a long time that gives serious, useful thought to the moon mars and beyond plan. Thank goodness Bush understands this stuff. I think NASA and Bush are making all the right choices right now. Retire Hubble, finish ISS, shuttle replacement, etc.

Man, I saw a NASA television thing last week about a discussion between JPL people and a cali senator and congressman, and they were all like "Wah, wah, I don't wanna lose my funding, I don't wanna lose Hubble", I was really surprised they didn't get behind the plan. They'd rather look at the stars than go to them.


6 posted on 05/31/2004 11:24:08 AM PDT by unibrowshift9b20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Utter blathering nonsense.

We are not returning humans to the moon, much less Mars.

In your lifetime, mine, or Bush's.

==================================

Apollo cost $27 billion in 1969 dollars. Since then, Nixon devalued the dollar so that every dollar you own is worth about a dime. Most of the "greybeard" experts are dead; the infrastructure gone. Yes, the technology is (slightly) better. It still costs $10K per pound to lift mass to orbit. So a there-and-back stunt to the Moon would cost (in my conservative estimate) only $250 billion in 2004 dollars. To put a colony on the Moon, call it $500 billion. A there-and-back stunt to Mars: maybe $750 billion, and a bare-bones colony on Mars at least a trillion.

NASA's budget has not been increased more than a few hundred million--and it won't be until we defeat the Islamics.

Bottom line: if anybody lands on the Moon, he/she won't be Americans.

I say this from 29 years experience in the aerospace business.

Period.

--Boris

9 posted on 05/31/2004 11:38:18 AM PDT by boris (The deadliest weapon of mass destruction in history is a Leftist with a word processor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson