Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A New Attack on Rush
National Review Online ^ | May 28, 2004 | Byron York

Posted on 05/30/2004 7:30:48 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: get'emall
Does Soros pay Brock more than ErrAmerika pays alFranken?

Maybe. Actually, Hitlery got a hold of Brock's FBI File, and he has never been the same, since! ;-)

41 posted on 05/31/2004 3:10:15 AM PDT by SubMareener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
You called it right, even if it was deleted!!!

You can no longer call people what Brits call a handrolled cigarette????

42 posted on 05/31/2004 4:57:05 AM PDT by Lazamataz ("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" -- harpseal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ethyl
That's not the same thing, Franken explained: "Rush's message is that liberals hate America, while NPR is straight-ahead reporting and journalism.

If I understand Mr Franken's statement, he is saying that NPR has started echoing Rush's message? Wonderful!


gitmo
43 posted on 05/31/2004 5:07:05 AM PDT by gitmo (Thanks, Mel. I needed that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The reality is that the talk-radio market in the United States is not balanced; conservatives have been far more successful than liberals in making a product that people want to hear.

The problem here is the commentator is misapplying the word 'balanced'. His vision of balance is based on opinions. If you applied this definition to building a house, doors would open or shut on their own, windows would jam, and a marble placed on the floor would roll to one end of the house. That's why we use a plumbline as the standard in constructing a house, not opinion.

Balance should be centered on truth, not on opinion. If you use truth as the standard for measuring balance, NPR is far from balanced. Rush is pretty darned close to plumb.

gitmo
44 posted on 05/31/2004 5:17:53 AM PDT by gitmo (Thanks, Mel. I needed that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

David Brock, Liar
A lifelong habit proves hard to break.
By Timothy Noah
Posted Wednesday, March 27, 2002, at 9:11 AM PT


45 posted on 05/31/2004 5:33:10 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

But if I really say it... The radio won't play it... So I guess I'll hafta lay it... BETWEEN THE LINES!!!


46 posted on 05/31/2004 7:32:22 AM PDT by SierraWasp (STOP PREMPTIVE JOURNALISM!!! A malevolent media can kill America's will, AGAIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

Thanks for the links. Your links remind me of how strange these days are for the ACLU, backing Rush in this case and the NRA in CFR, while their heroes Alan Dershowitz(sp?) and Laurence Tribe say the Second Amendment recognizes an individual right.


47 posted on 05/31/2004 12:27:09 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
If I remember right, Rush is only on for one hour. Perhaps a member of our fighting forces can confirm this. If so, I will write a letter to Rumsfeld encouraging him to broadcast all three hours of Rush's show.

You remember correctly (but I'm not a member of our fighting forces) and I said the same thing on another thread. Stick it in their eye by putting him on 3 hours a day.

48 posted on 05/31/2004 12:54:30 PM PDT by b4its2late (Every morning is the dawn of a new error...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Your links remind me of how strange these days are for the ACLU, backing Rush in this case and the NRA in CFR, while their heroes Alan Dershowitz(sp?) and Laurence Tribe say the Second Amendment recognizes an individual right.

Bizzare, isn't it?

49 posted on 05/31/2004 1:18:16 PM PDT by backhoe (--30--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
For the record, Rush didn't condone the so called abuses, he just thinks they were over reacted to for political purposes, as do I!!!!

Exactly. I agreed pretty much with everything Rush said.

Not only have the abuses been blown totally out of perspective for political purposes, but now they are doing the same thing with Rush's comments.
The deceitfulness of the left knows no bounds.

50 posted on 05/31/2004 5:51:00 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson