Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Free trade deal signed; now it's up to Congress
Reuters ^ | May 30, 2004

Posted on 05/29/2004 10:43:43 AM PDT by Dog Gone

WASHINGTON — The United States and five Central American countries signed a free trade agreement Friday — subject to approval by the U.S. Congress.

The U.S.-Central American Free Trade Agreement, or CAFTA, would extend the North American Free Trade Agreement down most of the land bridge connecting Mexico to South America.

At a signing ceremony with ministers from Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick said approving CAFTA and a companion pact with the Dominican Republic would offer "new hope for easing poverty, fostering development and strengthening democracy" in a region racked by war and civil unrest during the 1980s.

Opponents, such as the AFL-CIO labor federation and Friends of the Earth, say CAFTA would have a devastating effect on workers, farmers and the environment.

They also say it would drive up health care costs in CAFTA countries by extending patent protections for U.S. pharmaceuticals.

The Bush administration says CAFTA's labor and environmental terms go further than previous trade pacts and follow guidelines Congress provided in 2002.

Most business groups, farm organizations and corporations support the agreement.

CAFTA would immediately eliminate duties on more than 80 percent of U.S. consumer and industrial exports to Central America and over 50 percent of U.S. farm goods.

Tariffs on other goods, except sugar on the U.S. side and a few sensitive farm products on the other, would be phased out over time.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cafta; latinamerica; trade; turass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 05/29/2004 10:43:44 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Opponents, such as the AFL-CIO labor federation and Friends of the Earth, say CAFTA would have a devastating effect on workers, farmers and the environment.

The liberalidiots have painted themselves into a nice box. Drive jobs out of the country with environuttiness then complain that their unions have no more work.

2 posted on 05/29/2004 10:48:35 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

If it's in excess of 30,000 pages, like NAFTA, unread by about 99% of those in Congress, it'll pass with ease.


3 posted on 05/29/2004 10:49:51 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Dog Gone
With these "free trade" treaties, Robert Zoellick and the Bush Administration continue to import Third World poverty onto U.S. soil.
Infamous 'Made in USA' sweatshop island Saipan facing gloomy future

NAFTA was bad enough.
But with CAFTA, we can reasonably expect Puerto Rico to decline into economic parity with Haiti...
Mainland states, like Florida, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, the Carolinas, etc. have a further distance to drop
but their standard of living will also decline into parity with the poverty of other nations along the Gulf of Mexico.

5 posted on 05/29/2004 10:54:50 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Correct me if I am wrong, but it also makes it much easier for US citizens to spend a lot of time in the CAFTA countries without having to file a lot of paperwork. They should also find it much easier to own property and conduct business.

CAFTA could have the effect of exporting US retirees south.

6 posted on 05/29/2004 10:56:20 AM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vishnu6

Oh, I suppose the Western Hemisphere is better. However without massive, massive investment there is no way that the likes of Nicaragua and Guatemala are going to even come close to China's productivity.


7 posted on 05/29/2004 10:59:12 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Drive jobs out of the country with environuttiness then complain that their unions have no more work.

And liberal neocons like Robert Zoellick take advantage of that situation to gleefully demolish our own economic infrastructure.

8 posted on 05/29/2004 10:59:58 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
It probably won't be voted on this year, although I hope it is.

I'm very much in favor of CAFTA. It's going to greatly increase our exports of food products to these countries, plus it opens those countries to US companies.

In Costa Rica, for example, the government had a monopoly on the insurance industry and in telecommunications. After CAFTA passes, Cingular and Verizon will be down there competing. The Costa Rica consumer will have access to Kellogg's Frosted Flake and American meat exports.

I looked for turkey in their supermarkets on my last trip and couldn't find any. That will change after CAFTA passes.

Additionally, the CAFTA countries have agreed to recognize American copyright and patents. This treaty will have huge benefits for America.

9 posted on 05/29/2004 11:04:49 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vishnu6
...Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick said approving CAFTA and a companion pact with the Dominican Republic would offer "new hope for easing poverty, fostering development and strengthening democracy" in a region racked by war and civil unrest during the 1980s.

Are you saying that these are stable governments that will honor this treaty? I am not very well versed in the governments of SA but, I don't often hear that they are stable.

10 posted on 05/29/2004 11:06:14 AM PDT by raybbr (My 1.4 cents - It used to be 2 cents, but after taxes - you get the idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ikka
CAFTA could have the effect of exporting US retirees south.

I've already decided that it's going to export me within the next 10 years, possibly 5.

11 posted on 05/29/2004 11:06:53 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neutrino

pingarooski


12 posted on 05/29/2004 11:08:22 AM PDT by raybbr (My 1.4 cents - It used to be 2 cents, but after taxes - you get the idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Thanks for your comments. I've seen what NAFTA did for our nation. I expect CAFTA to do more of the same. It would be hard to imagine it, but you'll see far more illegal immigration as a result of this travesty. You'll see food stuffs from central America replace that industry in the United States. Yes, I can think of nothing better for the U.S. than to move our food production of shore, as we've done so much else.

I wish I could share your delight in this.


13 posted on 05/29/2004 11:12:11 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Those countries are far more stable than you might think. All are democracies, and although both El Salvador and Nicaragua had civil wars during the Cold War, they have emerged stronger and more democratic than ever in their history.

Costa Rica has a constitution much like our own, except that it has no army whatsoever. The government spends that money on education and health care.

All will observe the treaty. It's going to help their citizens, plus the US has a long history of going down there and kicking their butts when they get out of line.

14 posted on 05/29/2004 11:18:23 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
You have it backwards, I think. The biggest reluctance of these countries in signing the treaty is their fear that imports of American food will drive their small farmers out of existence. There's no way they can compete with our efficient ways of farming and then processing food.

The one place they could beat us is in sugar production, but CAFTA amazingly still protects the trade barriers we have for sugar (and that's why Americans pay more for sugar than any other country in the world).

15 posted on 05/29/2004 11:23:13 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Evidently you and I are shopping in different market chains. When I go to buy fruit, it's wonderful to find that it's direct from Australia. I live in California, which formerly produced one of the two largest orange crops for the nation.

When I pick up strawberries, they're from Mexico. I might add that some of those are tainted with human waste. You see, the sad little truth is that regulations south of our border are non-existant. That's another sad reality you gloss over.

I could go on.

Thanks for the comments.


16 posted on 05/29/2004 11:27:40 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Back when I was a kid in southern California, there were strawberry fields and orange groves in Orange County. Knott's Berry Farm was actually a farm.

Well, now the county has been turned into a city and the only local oranges might be on a tree you plant in your backyard.

NAFTA didn't drive American strawberry farmers out of business. And wash your fruit before you eat it, no matter where it was grown!

17 posted on 05/29/2004 11:37:20 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
and that's why Americans pay more for sugar than any other country in the world

Yet they are fatter. GO figure.

18 posted on 05/29/2004 11:37:32 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

LOL


19 posted on 05/29/2004 11:38:32 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; DoughtyOne

I have to agree with Doughtyone. I am not nearly as enthusiastic about these deals as you. I suspect that you have business deals that will benefit from this.


20 posted on 05/29/2004 12:08:02 PM PDT by raybbr (My 1.4 cents - It used to be 2 cents, but after taxes - you get the idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson