Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Smart bullet' reports back wirelessly
New Scientist ^ | 28 May 04 | Will Knight

Posted on 05/28/2004 11:53:51 PM PDT by pt17

A "smart bullet" that can be fired at a target and then wirelessly transmit back useful information has been developed by US researchers.

The projectile, created at the University of Florida in Gainesville, US, is 1.7 centimetres in diameter can be fired at from an ordinary paint-ball gun. The front is coated in an adhesive polymer that sticks it to the target.

Inside, the elongated projectile holds a sensor, a tiny wireless transmitter and a battery. This enables it to report back its findings to a laptop or handheld computer up to 70 metres away. It can also reusable, because compressed gas within the gun provides the propulsion.

The prototype developed by the researchers was fitted with an accelerometer. To test it, the students fired it at a target which was then shaken to activate the accelerometer and produce data for transmission.

But the US firm Lockheed Martin, which provided funding for the project, is interested in developing a version containing a miniature sensor capable of detecting traces of the explosive TNT.

(Excerpt) Read more at newscientist.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Technical; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: banglist; guns; miltech; projectile; warfare; waronterror; weapons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 05/28/2004 11:53:53 PM PDT by pt17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1144280/posts

for your book!


2 posted on 05/28/2004 11:56:17 PM PDT by B4Ranch (“If all that Americans want is security, they can go to prison-Dwight Eisenhower-12/8/49)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pt17; nuconvert
Ok, who is producing this bullet? Bruce Wayne through Wayne Industries, or Tony Stark for his Iron-Man project? Inquiring minds want to know.

Or do I smell a certain Brit working for her Majesty's secret service? Hmmmm!

3 posted on 05/29/2004 12:19:19 AM PDT by spetznaz (Nuclear missiles: The ultimate Phallic symbol.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

What would they use it for?


4 posted on 05/29/2004 12:19:55 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

check your FReep mail


5 posted on 05/29/2004 12:30:09 AM PDT by B4Ranch (“If all that Americans want is security, they can go to prison-Dwight Eisenhower-12/8/49)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pt17

Well, it has been in Hollywood use for decades. Ever noticed how the positive character always hits the target without even aiming at it, and (it comes with a smart gun, which must be still classified) never has to reload?


6 posted on 05/29/2004 12:51:05 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pt17

Tom Selleck and Gene Simmons starred in a movie about this.


7 posted on 05/29/2004 12:52:24 AM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monty22

8 posted on 05/29/2004 12:54:41 AM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
Some earlier BLAM-related references: There's also some DARPA references available if you care to search for them.
9 posted on 05/29/2004 12:58:43 AM PDT by pt17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
Well, it has been in Hollywood use for decades. Ever noticed how the positive character always hits the target without even aiming at it, and (it comes with a smart gun, which must be still classified) never has to reload

LOL, you're right.
10 posted on 05/29/2004 12:59:58 AM PDT by pt17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pt17
Well, here's an application:

Know how we have a problem with our troops getting fired at by disruptors shielded from within raging mobs? How we have a problem, because once you counter-attack, the bad guys run away, or we end up hitting civilians?

Shoot one of these into one of them, with the thing constantly relaying updated GPS coordinates. When the bad guys rally after the ambush for an after-action report, well, there's where you bring the action to THEM!

Or, just sit back for several hours, and study their habits --your choice.

11 posted on 05/29/2004 7:55:34 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Why would it need to be electronic, necessarily. Why not just tag with a chemical which is easily traced by sensor and/or K9, using a soft BB size pellet so it doesn't actually damage anything and draw attention to its strike.


12 posted on 05/29/2004 8:01:31 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!
13 posted on 05/29/2004 8:06:08 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
Actually, I thought it would have been a good move to hand out throw-away paintball guns to SF & Iraqis to deface Saddam's ubiquitious posters before/during/after our invasion.

Talk about psy-ops!

14 posted on 05/29/2004 8:41:01 AM PDT by TXnMA (Now back home in God's country...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pt17
King also warns that firing a projectile at a potential explosive goes against bomb disposal guidelines.

Gee, I wonder why....

15 posted on 05/29/2004 10:26:56 AM PDT by TaxPayer2000 (The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
Know how we have a problem with our troops getting fired at by disruptors shielded from within raging mobs? How we have a problem, because once you counter-attack, the bad guys run away, or we end up hitting civilians?

Interesting application, reminscent of what the authorities were trying to come up with in the riot-prone 60s.

I remember Smith & Wesson had a revolver that used .22 blanks to propel a dye-loaded slug to identify mob ringleaders. (Maybe the precursor of today's paintball guns.) They dropped the project as it was liable to kill if the wrong part of the anatomy was hit. Not a loss in my eyes if it was the right guy - I think that was the real problem, you might hit a second-rater.

16 posted on 05/29/2004 10:36:59 AM PDT by Oatka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
Ever noticed how the positive character always hits the target without even aiming at it, and (it comes with a smart gun, which must be still classified) never has to reload?

Even notice that if the POV is the bad guy sighting using a sniper rifle and cross-hairs he always hits the glass/coffee cup while the potential victim walks from the kitchen to the living room?

You'd think a professional would be able to hit the much larger target of a human body.

17 posted on 05/29/2004 10:40:53 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (This is a tag: </> This is a Line ---------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pt17
The projectile, created at the University of Florida in Gainesville, US, is 1.7 centimetres in diameter can be fired at from an ordinary paint-ball gun.

That is not a bullet. That is artillery.

18 posted on 05/29/2004 10:44:32 AM PDT by AndrewC (I am a Bertrand Russell agnostic, even an atheist.</sarcasm>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pt17
You know, I've wondered why there hasn't been a lot of research done to create a "deadly fly" or a fly-sized robot/video camera. God knows a creature as small as a fly could get in to places even flying drones could not.

Perhaps there has been work done on this area...and we just don't know it. :)

19 posted on 05/29/2004 10:52:03 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Actually, it is much simpler: use a flamethrower over their heads to create a burning obstacle BEHIND the hostile crowd. The crowd starts dissipating immediately even before it is "well done". This way they are channeled, gunmen and civilians, into, should we say, a "checkpoint", where bad guys can be picked "still warm". Besides, the psychological effect (breaking the will to fight) is highly desirable.


20 posted on 05/29/2004 11:05:27 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson