Replies

Oh good grief. Another one with nothing on his mind except the borders.

I see you are new here. I hope you have more to say than to add your concerns about the borders to EVERY SINGLE THREAD like the others do.

The border controls are not good enough, but do we really have to hear about them on every thread?

"Oh good grief. Another one with nothing on his mind except the borders.

I see you are new here. I hope you have more to say than to add your concerns about the borders to EVERY SINGLE THREAD like the others do.

The border controls are not good enough, but do we really have to hear about them on every thread?"

===

DITTO.

Thanks for saving me the trouble of having to say exactly that.

If I was an AQ planner, and my goal was to see Kerry elected, I'd plan a Madrid-level terrorist attack (or worse) for mid October. I'd use Spanish speaking Moroccans (like the expendables who did the Madrid attacks). I'd send them to Mexico as tourists via South America. No problemo.

Then I'd make sure that plenty of clues (cell phones in unexploded bombs, just like in Madrid) led straight to some of these terrorists who simply walked in over the open Mexican border.

Kerry and the 'rat loving media would have a field day with this theme, 24-7, right up to the election:

"This horrible act of terrorism happened because George W. Bush sent our military to Iraq, and left the border wide open! It's Bush's fault, it's his incompetence! He should have sealed the border after 9-11, instead he sent the Army to Iraq!"

Those ads and new stories will run around the clock, and millions of swing voters will believe them. Those ads will work. They will beat Bush about the head with that message.

(Never mind that Kerry or Gore would be worse for border security, that's irrelevant. The 'rats are natural born liars.)